this post was submitted on 19 Mar 2025
132 points (94.0% liked)

Technology

66984 readers
7199 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 77 points 1 day ago (4 children)

The price is irrelevant because this is will be purchased with government dollars. This drone is not for you and me; it is intended to be used against you and me.

Just read the actual product page. They are targeting military, law enforcement, and surveillance applications. These guys have a heading on their product page titled "paramilitary," for fuck's sake.

[–] b1t@lemm.ee 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Economies of scale is most definitely at play here as well.

TL;DR - They're making a lot less of them (compared to DJI) so they have to charge more per unit.

[–] NeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.world 4 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

That does NOT justify 6x more.

[–] b1t@lemm.ee 3 points 23 hours ago

I'm pointing it out as a compounding factor to the post I replied to (a limited target market). Not as the sole reason.

[–] espentan@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Can't hold back spending taxpayer money when shopping for tools to keep the taxpayer down. /s

[–] roofuskit@lemmy.world 2 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

They better be shielded really well against EMF.

[–] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 4 points 23 hours ago

They don't have to be; they're radio controlled. Figuring out what frequency they're on and blasting it should be trivial, if necessary.

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 12 points 22 hours ago
[–] richardisaguy@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

"A fine price to pay for freedom!"

~ people who don't know what freedom is, probably

[–] AdamEatsAss@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Does freedom take apple pay?

[–] 1024_Kibibytes@lemm.ee 4 points 1 day ago

The U.S. version certainly does.

[–] Erasmus@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago

Nearly 5k?????!!

Holy cow.

[–] Teknikal@eviltoast.org 10 points 1 day ago

To be fair Dji makes drones for gov agencies etc as well like the Dji matrice 4t thermal, priced similar to this but yeah AI, thermal cameras, 3d mapping etc.

[–] Anarch157a@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 day ago

That's the true cost of decades of protectionist demagoguery disguised as "national security".

[–] SoupBrick@pawb.social 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

DJI gets designated as a threat to national security

[–] NeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.world 1 points 23 hours ago

You can bet on that.

And you cannot be sure whether it's justified or not :)

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Taking design cues from the flying dildo, I see.

This looks like a self inserting butt plug and I want one.

[–] MyOpinion@lemm.ee 1 points 1 day ago

What a deal!