this post was submitted on 29 Jul 2023
-55 points (7.7% liked)

Movies

7474 readers
169 users here now

Lemmy

Welcome to Movies, a community for discussing movies, film news, box office, and more! We want this to be a place for members to feel safe to discuss and share everything they love about movies and movie related things. Please feel free to take part and help our community grow!


Related Communities:

!books@lemmy.world - Discussing books and book-related things.

!comicbooks@lemmy.world - A place to discuss comic books of all types.

!marvelstudios@lemmy.world - LW's home for all things MCU.


While posting and commenting in this community, you must abide by the Lemmy.World Terms of Service: https://legal.lemmy.world/tos/

  1. Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, ableist, or advocating violence will be removed.

  2. Be civil: disagreements happen, but that doesn’t provide the right to personally insult others.

  3. Spam, self promotion, trolling, and bots are not allowed

  4. Shitposts and memes are allowed until they prove to be a problem.

    Regarding spoilers; Please put "(Spoilers)" in the title of your post if you anticipate spoilers, as we do not currently have a spoiler tag available. If your post contains an image that could be considered a spoiler, please mark the thread as NSFW so the image gets blurred. As far as how long to wait until the post is no longer a spoiler, please just use your best judgement. Everyone has a different idea on this, so we don't want to make any hard limits.

    Please use spoiler tags whenever commenting a spoiler in a non-spoiler thread. Most of the Lemmy clients don't support this but we want to get into the habit as clients will be supporting in the future.

Failure to follow these guidelines will result in your post/comment being removed and/or more severe actions. All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. We ask that the users report any comment or post that violates the rules, and to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Watched Oppenheimer today. It's a fantastic film. Christopher Nolan is a fucking genius. The way the movie is structured, the quality of scenes, the general feel, everything is so refreshing. It was a revelation when most of the movies releasing are woke shit.

But still barbie gets more popular than Oppenheimer? What? I watched trailers and reviews of barbie and from what I know, it's a woke shit that tells matriarchy is better than patriarchy, with a bit of comedy admittedly. I mean yes they can have their freedom of speech, but how does a film like that shadows a fucking artwork like Oppenheimer? What am I missing?

all 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] AlwaysNowNeverNotMe@kbin.social 25 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"woke shit"

"Please be civil"

I loled

[–] Xylinna@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Your comment of "woke shit" and "pls be civil" cancel each other out there.

But with not seeing either movie, I would say the big difference is Barbie is a family movie. Now is Oppenheimer a better movie from a technical standpoint? Absolutely, but parents can't really drop the kids off to go watch a rate R movie.

[–] rephlekt2718@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago

lol that got me too, like bud you started not being civil . Also I love both movies, but you cant be suprised that people don’t wanna be bummed watching a movie about a massive death event and instead want a comedy

[–] sijt@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

Hasn’t seen Barbie yet asserts that 1) Another movie is better and 2) the movie they’ve not seen is “woke shit”.

Yep, about the level of discourse I’d expect from someone who uses the word “woke” unironically.

Also, i strongly suspect you’re not getting your opinions from trailers, but rather from the typical brain dead right wing mouthpieces who completely missed the point of Barbie, because of course they did.

[–] jesterraiin@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What am I missing?

The last 50 or so years of Mankind's history.

[–] mp3@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 year ago

Barbie has a bigger audience target, and even kids can go see it and have fun. I wouldn't bring my toddlers to see Oppenheimer, I'd go watch it with only my wife but that requires finding someone to watch after them for at least 3 hours

[–] flipht@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago

The world is on fire. People want to relax. Barbie does that better than Oppenheimer, which mostly just reminds us of the fragility of our existence and that there are people out there trying to destroy the world for whatever reason they've gotten into their heads.

[–] rebelsimile@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Are you seriously confused why a fun summer movie based on a property everyone has heard of is doing more business than a movie about nuclear physics?

[–] hglman@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

But it haz woke, ver bad to movie

[–] newtraditionalists@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Holy shit dude, learn to write before attempting to engage in written conversation. This reads like it was written by a 13 year old who barely pays attention in class. It's so clear you're not actually asking in good faith and just felt compelled to complain. To answer your "question", people are less likely to seek out art about privileged men destroying things than they are a fun summer movie.

[–] RespectMyAuthoriteh@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"Why are apples more popular than oranges?"

[–] rikudou@lemmings.world 3 points 1 year ago

I mean, why? Apples are the worst fruit there is while oranges are close to perfect.

[–] Malek061@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

You don't have enough kenergy to understand.

[–] shogoll@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I watched trailers and reviews of barbie and from what I know, it’s a woke shit that tells matriarchy is better than patriarchy, with a bit of comedy admittedly.

Bro what???

[–] Rayspekt@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

pLs bE ciViL

[–] mancy@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I watched both within a few days of each other and liked Barbie way more than Oppenheimer ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

[–] Darth_Vader__@lemmy.world -4 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] mancy@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I posted my thoughts on the movies in their respective megathreads already so I won’t repost them. But it comes down to the simple fact that Christopher Nolan and his gimmicks drive me insane and I’ve never been a fan of his albeit technically impressive filmmaking.

Also it’s hilarious that you’re complaining of Barbie’s wokeness just cause what, it’s written and directed by a woman? Nolan can learn from that and perhaps add a female writer to his arsenal. He sucks at handling female characters and Oppenheimer is a prime example of that. Talk about wasted opportunities having Emily Blunt and Flo Pugh and relegating them to a mere drunk housewife and a pair of breasts. Actually every time I think about how Pugh’s character was handled I knock the movie down a couple more points. 🙄

[–] rephlekt2718@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yo same thoughts about Pugh, why did they have to frame everything with her boobs in it just right??? Felt out of place

[–] grill@thelemmy.club 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It's not more popular, oppenheimer has 2.5x more box office, imdb ratings...

I didn't watch the movies yet, but I'm sure both are good enough. Even barbie, Greta Gerwig didn't make a bad movie yet and her husband helping to cowrite is always a good result.

Nevertheless it's the same as it was always, movies get popular because of marketing, which is frustrating for me to confess. And they get popular, because they are already popular and they look kinda fun and popy.

Most people really don't care about other aspects of the filmmaking. And in my opinion your example is less frustrating, than Marvel dominating for the last decade.

[–] glad_cat@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Movies are meant to entertain mostly. Barbie is fun, not that other movie. The end.

[–] Darth_Vader__@lemmy.world -4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yes barbie is more comedy, but it's not like Oppenheimer is not enjoyable...

[–] Gingerrific@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

To whom though?

A couple can take their 3 kids to the Barbie movie and have a wonderful Saturday afternoon. That same couple isn't taking their 3 young children to Oppenheimer.

This isn't rocket science.

[–] Drusas@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Barbie draws in families with children, who tend to make up a large percentage of movie-goers. Those families won't be going to see Oppenheimer. They're also inherently larger groups than, say, a couple with no kids. Meanwhile, people who go to see Oppenheimer might also go to see Barbie. I guess I'm just saying that Barbie has a larger potential pool of viewers.

[–] Darth_Vader__@lemmy.world -4 points 1 year ago

Hmm.. That maybe the case. I just think Oppenheimer is not getting enough recognition for what it is..