this post was submitted on 13 Mar 2025
653 points (99.2% liked)

Technology

66485 readers
9142 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ileanallama@lemmy.world 3 points 8 hours ago

hoping the whole industry follows after, please subaru go back to the climate control buttons

[–] MisterMoo@lemmy.world 12 points 14 hours ago

Now get rid of the touch screen entirely. Mark my words, the first electric car unveiled as a totally analog experience will be incredibly popular.

[–] tiramichu@lemm.ee 125 points 2 days ago (4 children)

This may in part be motivated by new guidance from NCAP, which will from next year require that all new cars have physical controls to earn the highest safety ratings.

https://www.evo.co.uk/car-technology/207666/buttons-could-replace-touch-controls-in-cars-thanks-to-new-euro-ncap-tests

Whatever the motivation though, I'm glad for it. Getting rid of buttons was always a dumb idea and I'm happy to see pushback.

[–] Venator@lemmy.nz 1 points 5 hours ago

I guess they forgot to add air conditioning and volume to the list of vital controls...

[–] RejZoR@lemmy.ml 43 points 2 days ago (8 children)

It wasn't dumb from corporate perspective, which is why they all gobbled it up like junky hoovering on piles of white dust.

You know how expensive it is to mold unique dedicated physical buttons for every function and then wire them all over the place? Or just slap single touch display and cram all the shit into that single display. You code it once and use it on all models. Corporates were already counting the money saved there. Until it backfired because everyone hated it, reviewers criticized it and now it's finally also criticized by safety agencies.

[–] shaggyb@lemmy.world 22 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Cars cost way too much for me to care about this excuse.

[–] SeekPie@lemm.ee 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Yeah, but what about the value that saving money created for the shareholders?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 10 points 1 day ago (2 children)

You know how expensive it is to mold unique dedicated physical buttons for every function and then wire them all over the place?

Not expensive. You don't have to "wire them all over the place", you just put them on a PCB and connect them to the nearest CAN bus, or similar.

[–] T156@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

They'd basically already be doing that for the touch screen, and may well be using similar controls under the hood, where the physical buttons send a command to the computer to do a thing, in lieu of a mechanical connection.

[–] riodoro1@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

One more connector, one more cable in harness, more coding, more cad time, more manufacturing time and more testing.

If it comes out to 20 dollars per car and you multiply it by 50000 a year for a relatively popular model there is a nice bonus for the ceo. Oh, and the price to consumer increases at the same time.

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 2 points 1 day ago

If it comes out to 20 dollars per car and you multiply it by 50000 a year for a relatively popular model there is a nice bonus for the ceo.

Or you could just raise the price of the car by $20 since you've just added thousands in value?

I mean shit, let's take the seats out of the car! Bam! Just saved you billions, right? /s

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 1 points 1 day ago

More coding?! Are you serious? Over a touch screen!

Also, extremely easy to test.

[–] tiramichu@lemm.ee 11 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

As well as the pure cost saving there was also the notion that it was a futuristic look that would sell, and so boost profits that way, too.

And probably it did sell and market well - for a while.

I feel that consumers had become too trusting of carmakers - after all, cars have been getting better and better in terms of their usability for decades, so when carmakers went touchscreen everything, the first instinct of the average consumer would be to trust it and assume it represented an improvement."They wouldn't do it if it was worse, right?"

And so people buy the fancy futuristic car with no buttons, and only after driving it for a month does it sink in how much they truly hate it, and that they got sold a lie.

So there was always going to be that one generation of touchscreen-everything, before the people who got burnt by it are now the ones thinking "I won't buy anything again that doesn't have some buttons!"

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] leadore@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's been a long time since I looked but I hope most cars still have physical buttons/controls for all important functions! Besides being easier and faster to use, without them if a touchscreen malfunctions (hardware or software) everything is gone and you wouldn't be able to drive the car. Then there's the tracking and spying, and sometimes bugs and UI changes after updates--and now ads!?# Cars are becoming as enshittified like everything else now.

[–] Bristingr@lemm.ee 1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Are we gonna have to physically roll down our windows again?

[–] leadore@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

My car armrest has physical buttons (edit: I guess you'd call them "rocker switches") that I can push forward or backward to raise/lower the windows. It would be absolutely ridiculous to make me navigate a menu on a touchscreen to do that--please tell me newer cars aren't doing that?

[–] Leeuk@feddit.uk 22 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Not sure how they were able to remove so many buttons in the first place and not be marked down on safety. Suddenly trying to find a demister on a touchscreen menu while in motion was never a great idea. Surprisingly, Volvo off all companies have been one of the worst for this. That's why I like Dacias, little tech = little to go wrong.

[–] tempest@lemmy.ca 12 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I mean it was a great idea of you wanted to reduce costs while also increasing the price of the vehicle.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)

And Volvo went from this:

To this:

Which is quite the change...

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

OTOH now we will get to enjoy dashcam videos of car rollovers where the driver is like, Where's that playlist... OH GOD OH SHIT !!!

[–] jeena@piefed.jeena.net 33 points 2 days ago

That's very positive.

[–] southsamurai@sh.itjust.works 25 points 2 days ago

Now, take out the bullshit that's tracking you and sending the information back to them to sell, and we'll be doing something great

[–] FreeRangeMustard@lemm.ee 30 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (18 children)

That’s why I love brands like Hyundai. Never got rid of the knobs.

[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 27 points 2 days ago (11 children)

Honda as well.

Subaru went all in on the touch screen and it suuuuucked.

[–] BakerBagel@midwest.social 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

My uncle's outback looks like a video slot machine, and everything had to be done through the touchscreen. But to add insult to injury, the Subaru touchscreens are super slow and unresponsive, so they feel like they aren't working.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (17 replies)
[–] AFC1886VCC@reddthat.com 16 points 2 days ago (3 children)

I've never had this problem because I'm too poor to afford a car new enough to not have any buttons lmao

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] swizzlestick@lemmy.zip 15 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Not out of the goodness of their own hearts mind. It's probably more because Euro NCAP are going to be deducting score for not having physical essentials in 2026.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] yarn@lemmy.ca 9 points 2 days ago

Thank you!

I don't care what the reasoning is behind the decision (customer feedback vs. changes to safety ratings), I'm just glad it's happening and I hope all manufacturers follow suit.

This has been my gripe with new cars ever since I found myself needing one in 2022. Everything I looked at had a huge infotainment system front-ending climate and cabin controls. Want to turn your steering wheel heat off mid drive? Ha! Tap this specific spot on this screen 3 times and hope the car doesn't bounce while you're doing so or you'll accidentally turn something else on. Want to use voice controls? Joke's on you, they only work 50% of the time.

God forbid something happens to the control board (which costs thousands of dollars to replace if you're outside warranty), because then you're completely hosed.

You know what always worked without fail? The buttons in my 2005 Corolla.

load more comments
view more: next ›