this post was submitted on 26 Feb 2025
7 points (100.0% liked)

Fediverse

31432 readers
2770 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ExtremeDullard@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

After Andy Yen's endorsement of the orange utan, I would seriously reconsider using any Proton product.

Yen tried to backpedal meekly several times since then, to get out of the pickle he got himself into with his definitely-not-impressed customers, but it's a bit late for that: either he's pro-Trump or he's naive. Either way, he makes Proton sketchy.

[–] flamingos@feddit.uk 1 points 2 weeks ago

Do you have any recommendations for someone who just uses them for email?

[–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Idc if I likes Trump or not (even though Trump is garbage); but I do care that he says the Republicans - the party that has spent years attacking encryption and privacy, who has sued to obtain private medical records of women and trans people who see doctors, and who is funded by billionaire big tech moguls - is the better option for privacy.

Also just taking ANY position for a leader of the US - one of the biggest parties to the Five Eyes agreement - just leaves a bad taste.

[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 0 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Does Proton really support Trump? A deeper analysis

One thing to note is that while on Reddit, people are alleging that Proton is a company run by a fascist, pro-MAGA, pro-dictatorship CEO, users on X are accusing Andy and the company of being anti-MAGA/anti-Trump.

So, in the face of all the evidence I’ve found, to compare Andy to a tech oligarch like Zuck and Elon, who are now bootlicking on display for all to see, is not supported by the evidence.

[...]

However, being disillusioned with one party on one issue doesn’t mean that all of a sudden Andy Yen changed all of his stances and that now he’s actually pro-Republican or pro-MAGA. All of the evidence gathered suggests the exact opposite.

Considering how many users here have expressed similar disillusionment with the current Democratic party, it seems a bit hypocritical to judge Andy Yen for having the same feelings (or expressing them on occasion).

This whole "Proton supports MAGA" thing is another example of internet mob-think where everybody has an opinion informed by no facts at all, actively ignores or dismisses the larger context in order to protect that fragile opinion from reality, and most haven't even looked at the original statements that sparked the controversy.

[–] mosiacmango@lemm.ee 0 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Sure sure. The guy who unprompted endorsed a trump appointment that has deep US Telco ties, bizarrly said "the GOP is the party for the little guy," had nothing but wonderful things to say about J.D vance, stated that Chuck Schumer slow rolled 2 internet privacy bills because of "quid pro quo" with his daughters working for big tech, used the phrase "triggered" unprompted, and just randomly added "88" to the end of his new user name.

Yeah, that guy is just neutral and disillusioned with the Democratic party. It's not utterly clear what spaces and politics he aligns with. That would just be wholley unknowable.

[–] pulsewidth@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

It wasn't unprompted - he was literally replying to the announcement of the appointment on Twitter. An announcement of a person he thought would be great for a role that he's apparently been advocating for action against big tech in for years.

He's born in 1988 you dolt.

The ugliest thing about Lemmy I've noticed so far is that it enjoys disinformation just as much as Reddit - as long as it fits the circlejerk, updoots this way.

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

There is not and never was any endorsement of Trump. I wish people would stop spreading such wild disinformation.

He also never backpedaled.

[–] ExtremeDullard@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)
[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 0 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Here is the tweet

I know exactly what you're referring to.

if that's not the most flagrant Trump bootlicking, I don't know what is

I agree, you don't know what is. Agreeing with a single decision someone makes is not an endorsement. But that's exactly the kind of irrational dichotomic reaction I expect from society these days.

And here is the backpedal

I don't see anything here that could be construed as backpedaling. If he were smart he would have, but if anything, he doubled down several times.

I believe what I read.

You didn't read that, you made it up.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml -2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It's kind of stupid to say that Republicans aren't the party of big business anymore. Both parties are parties of big business.

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 0 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

If you want to claim it was a stupid thing to say, I will agree with you 100%. If you want to claim that it was a tacit endorsement specifically of Trump, you are just wrong and spreading disinformation.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml -2 points 2 weeks ago

I'll sometimes agree with stuff Trump does too, like appointing Tulsi Gabbard, but I'm not going to say this means Republicans have become the party of anti war lol

[–] Fedditor385@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

I cancelled my subscription because of technical reasons, but now I can add political reasons on top.

[–] lig@lemmings.world 0 points 1 week ago

Lately, their posts on Mastodon became full of comments questioning their CEO political views. I guess, this is the answer to those, a clear one.

[–] dan00@lemm.ee 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Such delicate snowflakes these ceos…

[–] Chewy7324@discuss.tchncs.de -1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I do think the second part of your statement was unnecessary.

[–] dan00@lemm.ee 1 points 1 week ago

In a normal scenario yes. This is not longer a normal situation. You support Trump? You better start hiding…

[–] Chonk@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

What kind of expensive resources you need to just post on Mastodon?

[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 1 points 1 week ago

ability to silence, and censor or criticism,?-proton probably

[–] Lion@programming.dev -1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

While I understand the concern around not wanting to support Maga or far right leaning extremists. I take somewhat of a net neutral approach to this topic. Just because some company isn't doing something I like doesn't mean they haven't produced a good product. For instance people whine and bitch all the time about Apple using child labor but that doesn't stop most people from owning a iphone because we (Americans) like iphones. Amazon is a crazy huge company that has time and time again treated thier employees like trash and yet we still use amazon prime. What are we going to do if Farmers and slaughter houses all vote for Trump? Stop buying groceries? No. Most people only care when it's convenient to care. We don't really want change or progress because to be honest most of us aren't going to or want to take up arms and start another civil war all over again. The arguments and fighting we have in the states is nothing new. We'll stay silent and continue our word vomit on social platforms while the world eats us a live because really trying would be too hard. That's the truth.

[–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world -1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

This might sound crazy but this is way worse to me than the CEO simping for orange man. At least for Trump he has a semi plausible excuse.

Reposting stuff on Mastodon or Bluesky barely requires any additional effort. And I cannot think of a good reason to close abandon the free publicity when they already have it set up.

[–] MoonlightFox@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

I think the reason is that every time they post something, someone there points out the Andy Yen thing. Thats basically the only comments. So its detrimental to their business.