this post was submitted on 06 Mar 2025
2 points (100.0% liked)

Linux

51580 readers
1233 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
AgreeableLandscape@lemmy.ml
nooter692@lemmy.ml
MarcellusDrum@lemmy.ml
cypherpunks@lemmy.ml
cyclohexane@lemmy.ml
d3Xt3r@lemmy.nz
2
Boiling Steam's latest analysis based on ProtonDB's dataset | Linux Distros in March 2025: Here Comes A New Challenger! (boilingsteam.com)
submitted 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) by jamesbunagna@discuss.online to c/linux@lemmy.ml
22 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

top 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Uebercomplicated@lemmy.ml 0 points 4 days ago (2 children)

It crushes me, CRUSHES ME, that the wretched Fedora beats my beloved openSUSE Tumbleweed in popularity! Why, oh why!??!

Seriously though, why do people prefer Fedora? I used it for 2 years and was very, very happy after switching my daily driver to Tumbleweed. It felt faster, had better repos, defaults, stability, etc. — aaaaaand it's rolling release, which is so much easier (ironically) from a stability perspective (every, EVERY, Fedora release something would break for me, gosh-darn-it). I just don't get it; am I the only one experiencing this?

[–] EarlGrey@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 4 days ago

I tried openSUSE a few months back because I wanted to be more closely associated with SUSE than Red Hat (I had to update to a new RHEL release at work about a year ago and really hated some of the shit they were pulling).

Here's a list of issues I had:

  • Was forced to not encrypt my system because for some reason the unlock screen rarely recognized my keyboard was connected and I couldn't input the password. I would have to turn on the computer, then reboot at least once to get it to work.
  • The absolute confusion surrounding YaST when I tried it out. The community made it sound like the best thing about openSUSE, but also don't use it because it's terrible. Apparently it's being depreciated now. Don't want to learn an entire system just for it to be removed.
  • I didn't experience any issues with this but it makes me nervous: Rolling Release + Required (for me) Community Repos. Meanwhile the standard release is slower than Fedora
  • This one is a big "first world problem" but it really annoyed me. zypper, it's one of the longest package manager names, and i can't tab to autocomplete because there are other packages with similar names.

Now, all of these I problems I could probably fix. But it just wasn't really worth the effort when my main issue was: "The downstream company associated with my Distro did some dumb shit that doesn't really impact my system."

[–] some_random_nick@lemmy.world -1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

My 2 cents. I started with Bazzite and switched to Fedora after some things broke. Fedora works for my use case and I don't see any reason to switch further. Even upgrading from 40 to 41 worked without hickups.

[–] pineapplelover@lemm.ee 2 points 3 days ago

I'm surprised bazzite broke

[–] golden_zealot@lemmy.ml 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Wow, fascinating to see I am one of the Few Debian users. It works great on the distribution, even better than what I had heard about other platforms.

[–] superkret@feddit.org 0 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Do you run Steam from Debian repos or Flatpak?

[–] golden_zealot@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 days ago

I go from the repos myself.

[–] thurstylark@lemm.ee 1 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Sooo... The author mentions that Manjaro fucked up, but I'm not sure what they're referring to...?

I mean, like... To which Manjaro fuckup are they referring?

[–] mrvictory1@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

https://manjarno.pages.dev/ Manjaro's Pamac took AUR down twice, also their website had its SSL certs expire 4 times

[–] jamesbunagna@discuss.online 1 points 5 days ago

I mean, like… To which Manjaro fuckup are they referring?

Obviously, I'm not the author. But if I'd have to guess, their answer would likely be "Yes.".

[–] superkret@feddit.org 1 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

Arch is the most "just works" distro I ever tried.
Reducing the workload of the distro maintainers by keeping packages vanilla and close to upstream, not writing a shitload of distro-specific GUI tools, and off-loading all the weird stuff to a user repo, is genius.
That way, there's more capacity to focus on getting it right.

Other distros have a lot more "features" (looking at you, OpenSUSE and Ubuntu) but Arch just gives you a high quality package of the newest stuff, and it's amazing how solid it is nowadays.

[–] fartsparkles@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

I went wild and started using it for servers about 5 years ago and I shit you not, it’s far more stable than I would have thought. I parse the blog for update notes if there’s any big changes to anything I’m using but given most stuff is offloaded to containers, I pretty much yolo a yay -Syu every week. Zero issues.

I had more issues with Debian and Ubuntu due to bugs in stale packages or weird default configs than I have running bleeding edge vanilla via Arch.

[–] thingsiplay@beehaw.org 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

The Ubuntu and Manjaro era is over. Arch is the new Ubuntu (by popularity for gaming). Fedora and Endeavour also grew a lot. Question is if they reached their ceiling already. Pop OS could explode in popularity once COSMIC is out, but maybe not for gaming. Bazzite got even a patch note addressing an issue with this specific distribution in the game Marvel Rivals. Here is a lot of potential for this distro, as an alternative for the future general SteamOS distro (if it ever comes out as a general install media). BTW, nobody seem to talk about HOLO ISO anymore.

[–] cronenthal@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 5 days ago

I root for bazzite. It's so easy to setup and update all while providing superb support for gaming. I actually run it as a desktop os and I love it.

[–] PushButton@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

Debian, always stable...

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 0 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (2 children)

Weird, am I blind or is there no SteamOS?
I know it's based on Arch, but it is NOT Arch.

[–] Decq@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

If only it was mentioned in the article...

This is mainly data reported from desktop PCs, so no, SteamOS is not a thing at the moment on such machines.

[–] superkret@feddit.org 1 points 5 days ago

This is mainly data reported from desktop PCs, so no, SteamOS is not a thing at the moment on such machines.

[–] jlow@beehaw.org 0 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Ah, yes, "Flatpak", my favourite distro 😸

[–] jamesbunagna@discuss.online 0 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Author's disclaimer:

"Flatpak is NOT a distro, but that’s what Steam reports when it’s running on Flatpak, and Flatpak being distro independent we report it as a separate environment, if that makes sense. Feel free to ignore it if you wish."

[–] jlow@beehaw.org 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It's interesting and kinda cool that you can't tell what distro it's running on when using Flatpak. I would have thought that there's some way to find out (it would be important for fixing bugs, I guess?)

[–] jamesbunagna@discuss.online 2 points 3 days ago

it would be important for fixing bugs, I guess?

I think this is where the sandbox~y nature of Flatpak comes in. It doesn't really care for the distro-environment, because it creates its own distro-agnostic one; ensuring that software continues to work regardless of the shit-show going on elsewhere.

It is for this and other reasons that some developers vouch for Flatpak.