this post was submitted on 05 Jan 2025
316 points (90.9% liked)

World News

39501 readers
2411 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Elon Musk has called on King Charles III to dissolve the UK Parliament, citing past controversies involving Prime Minister Keir Starmer and the Rotherham Scandal.

Musk accused Starmer of inaction during his tenure as head of the Crown Prosecution Service and urged a new general election, drawing backlash for spreading misinformation.

Critics argue that the monarchy lacks the unilateral power to dissolve Parliament under the 2022 Dissolution and Calling of Parliament Act.

Musk’s growing political involvement globally, including support for right-wing parties, has sparked calls for regulation against foreign interference.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 35 points 4 days ago

Well, he has sausage fingers, but he can still do something like what Mummy likely would have done if some South African upstart tried to tell her what to do:

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 30 points 4 days ago (3 children)

I was going to make a joke about how King Charles should dissolve Elon in a vat of acid, but I'm not sure if that's comes off as promoting violence in our current climate of oligarchicide.

[–] Bougie_Birdie@lemmy.blahaj.zone 16 points 4 days ago

Since this is advice given to a monarch by a person who otherwise has no impact on the rich and powerful, I'd argue you could call this a case of Jester's Privilege

We should bring that back. If nothing I do matters, then nothing I say matters, right?

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 11 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (3 children)

It would definitely be skirting the line of what we would moderate, but I think we'd probably let it go just because it's a comic book villain ending rather than saying "shoot him in the head" or whatever.

Plus, it would obviously be a joke.

Edit: all I can picture is this, but with Elon's face on it.

[–] Excrubulent@slrpnk.net 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I think Luig[MESSAGE CONTENTS CORRUPTED]usk.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ExtremeDullard@lemmy.sdf.org 31 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (5 children)

If I was Charles, I'd offer Elon Musk a knighthood to piss him off.

Musk would have to choose between stoking his gigantic ego with the title at the cost of giving up any post in the federal government as per article I, section 9, clause 8 of the U.S. Constitution or humiliate himself and refuse the title to keep running the orange utan he's invested billions in.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 30 points 4 days ago (2 children)

I doubt that would work.

All Trump would do would be to make his post an unpaid advisory one and then he'd get to insist people call him Sir Elon.

It's not like he needs the paycheck or the benefits and he would love the ego boost.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] then_three_more@lemmy.world 21 points 4 days ago

without the consent of the Congress, accept of any present, emolument, office, or title, of any kind whatever, from any king, prince, or foreign state.

He'd just buy enough congress people to get it passed.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 11 points 3 days ago

He can put him on ignore?

[–] Turbonics@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Time for some right wing infighting.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] wabafee@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

I think King Charles should do it. That way no more King Charles.

[–] root@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Bieren@lemmy.world 14 points 4 days ago

Musk should fuck off back to South Africa.

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 10 points 3 days ago (2 children)

It is my hope that the UK adds a second parliament, just to give Musk the middle finger.

load more comments (2 replies)

Even amongst Britain's right leaning folk this is a pretty stupid take..

[–] aggelalex@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago

Oh it's simple. If the king wants the UK to follow his last french counterpart's fate, this would be a romantically dramatic way of doing this.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›