this post was submitted on 23 Dec 2024
80 points (97.6% liked)

politics

19243 readers
2484 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The president-elect is renewing unsuccessful calls he made during his first term for the U.S. to buy Greenland from Denmark, adding to the list of allied countries with which he’s picking fights even before taking office on Jan. 20.

top 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] GiddyGap@lemm.ee 36 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Probably just the usual provocations and deranged negotiation tactics, but, I'm just gonna go ahead and say it: The US President-elect is a freakin' moron. Not that we didn't already know that, but America walked right into this lunacy with eyes wide open, fully aware. We deserve everything that's coming.

[–] OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca 22 points 3 days ago

We deserve everything that’s coming.

Speaking as part of the 96% of the world's population who are not American, we don't.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago (1 children)

If what scientists are saying about upcoming shortages of fresh water, Canada and Greenland would be brilliant moves...

Not that I expect Trump is the slightest bit aware of this issue:

https://www.worldwildlife.org/threats/water-scarcity

"Climate change is altering patterns of weather and water around the world, causing shortages and droughts in some areas and floods in others.

At the current consumption rate, this situation will only get worse. By 2025, two-thirds of the world’s population may face water shortages. And ecosystems around the world will suffer even more."

[–] Windex007@lemmy.world 13 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Gee if only there was a way for countries with a surplus of one resource and a deficit of another to exchange their own surplus at some rate for what another country has.

Perhaps even treaty agreements about the rates. The nations could maybe agree on shared intermediary token representing value.

TRump could perhaps even name such a new visionary system of exchange after himself: "TRade"?

We could further honour him by naming the negotiated parameters a "TRade agreement"?

I dunno. This is some fucking bleeding edge international relations concepts, I'm certainly not equipped to wrap my head around such forward thinking.

[–] podperson@lemm.ee 10 points 3 days ago

No - I believe our new incoming prime minister will call it "X".

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Getting water down from Canada ain't easy.

[–] BlueEther@no.lastname.nz 9 points 3 days ago

But Canada is up and water likes to flow down... Where's the problem?

[–] MrVilliam@lemm.ee 5 points 3 days ago

Trump Aid. TrAid for short. But change the spelling to avoid litigation from Kool-Aid. TrAde. And let's make that A lower case. Trade. Can I have a position in the administration now?

[–] Lasherz12@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I'm pretty sure if Greenland went from the Denmark socialist system to America's Late stage capitalist hell hold, that would just start a civil war.

[–] GiddyGap@lemm.ee 15 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Don't know if you're kidding or not, but Denmark is not a socialist country. It's a capitalist country, except one that actually works.

[–] Lasherz12@lemmy.world 12 points 3 days ago (1 children)

To US citizens, any Universal Healthcare is socialist.

[–] GiddyGap@lemm.ee 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I'm a US citizen, and I don't see it as socialist.

[–] Lasherz12@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

You must be extra special to use actual definitions and not vibes, good job being an anecdotal outlier.

[–] Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago

Wait until he takes office. One of his cabinet picks isn't going to make it, and he'll threaten to nuke the Bahamas in retaliation because they're surrounded by too much water and that's not fair to the US. He demands that that water be returned to the Great Salt Lake where it belongs so it can be used to solve all of the water crisis in the country and Make America Wet again.

Then Stormy daniels will chime in and remind us that Trump is incapable of getting anyone wet.

[–] quicklime@lemm.ee 4 points 3 days ago

Someone should sell him a fake, mocked-up Greenland, fly him there for a photo shoot, and disappear with the money. And leave him stranded too.

[–] YurkshireLad@lemmy.ca 10 points 3 days ago

So America First is less about nationalism and isolationism, and more about building an empire?

[–] ReallyActuallyFrankenstein@lemmynsfw.com 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I'm just going to go on a limb and say: I'm pretty sure this is also a result of Trump having unmonitored conversations with Putin.

This not only fits Putin's "annex everything you want" mentality, but implanting visions of pre-modern conquering or "deal-making" victories is one of the only ways to further inflate Trump's ego. It would be so easy to convince Trump that this is how he'll make history.

And of course, it would be absolutely perfect for Putin's interests if Trump gets distracted with committing major US time and attention in Quixotic land grabs or policy. He not only won't have that attention to spare to keep Putin in check (as if Trump would ever do that), but there are few ways to deeply insult another country more than treating it as a future vassal, further ruining the US's relationships and alliances.

[–] foggy@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

Put wants Canada and Greenland via the US, so that he controls >50% of Earth's dry land.

[–] yournamehere@lemm.ee 3 points 3 days ago

it will be the biggest america. never has been before. "insane mumbles* we will build a bridge and make the trolls pay. grabs woman by the pussy biden should have run. maga maga.

anyway, america has become the laughing stock of the world once again.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago

I'm so tired of this and he's not even in office yet.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

To keep this straight, the US military deployment orders for 2025 are 25th Infantry to Panama, 3rd Armor to Northern Mexico, 11th Airborne to Greenland, 101st Air Assault to Syria, 82nd Airborne to Lebanon, and Special Service to Gaza.

I'm excited to hear where they're sending 10th Mountain.

[–] MagicShel@lemmy.zip 3 points 3 days ago

Probably to Alaska to make everyone call it Mt. McKinley. Because where else is Trump going to think to put 10th Mountain?

[–] droporain@lemmynsfw.com 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Excellent state 54! Is anyone beginning to suspect little Donnie wants a one government world order to be run by himself till the end of time... Nah.

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

to be run by himself till the end of time

So like three years until his cheeto heart gives away?

[–] droporain@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 3 days ago

The Cheeto empire doesn't end with him unfortunately.

[–] eran_morad@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Can we trade musk for Greenland?

[–] Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago

You could offer me a loaf of stale bread for Musk and I'd still come out ahead in the deal.