this post was submitted on 23 Dec 2024
146 points (96.8% liked)

World News

39380 readers
2613 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 44 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] underthesign@lemmy.world 36 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Everyone here thinking the reason they were dropped was because the quality turned to shit after the buyout, but the main reason is their continued presence operating in Russia after their thankfully failed attempt to annex Ukraine. I'm pleased the royals took a stand. Ultimately both are good reasons to drop them.

[–] Shard@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Wouldn't it be nice if the world was Cadbury?

[–] GeneralEmergency@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Everyone here thinking the reason they were dropped was because the quality turned to shit

But how else am I supposed to show my really cool and deep personality of hating anything vaguely popular?

[–] 13esq@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I don't think that not wanting enshittification of Cadbury's mean you have a "really cool and deep personality".

It's not about hating popular things, it's about hating shrinkflation. I for one would happily pay a little more rather than have the products I love become so shit that I don't want to buy them anyway, which is the only real power you have as a consumer.

Cream eggs are case in point. Not only are they smaller now, but the ingredients are shitter quality and it shows.

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

You can still hate chlamydia

[–] GeneralEmergency@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

And conform? Why don't you make me drink a Starbucks coffee you heartless monster

[–] MonsterMonster@lemmy.world 108 points 3 days ago (1 children)

This shouldn't come as a surprise. Since its takeover by Kraft/Mondelez their chocolate has become poorer quality. As soon as the Cadbury name was being licenced to various other diversified food products (ice cream, cakes etc.) it was a sign of what was to come. Sad. Still not as bad as Hershey's though.

[–] Mango@lemmy.world 15 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I use the same metric for videogames. The instant they're buying up other companies' IP to sell skins, they're cooked.

[–] whotookkarl@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

In game purchases are already a pretty bad sign it's a commodified product dopamine machine and not an artistic experience. I don't think I'd have the same regard for classics like Grim Fandango or Mario 64 if they built a store into the game.

[–] ms_lane@lemmy.world 32 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It's shit chocolate now, I can fully understand it.

[–] Leate_Wonceslace@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Kraft is the death of quality.

[–] MonsterMonster@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Whenever I hear Kraft I instantly think of a block of cooking fat. With Cadbury it's the same block of fat but brown.

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

brings new meaning to the term "fat shit"

[–] BlackEco@lemmy.blackeco.com 35 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Can someone explain to me what is this warrant list? What does it bring to companies in it?

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 43 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] s_s@lemm.ee 3 points 1 day ago

Talk American to me any time.

[–] Isoprenoid@programming.dev 35 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The warrant enables the supplier to advertise that they supply to the royal family.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_royal_warrant_holders_of_the_British_royal_family

[–] Coreidan@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

Gotcha so nothing burger then.

There is absolutely no reason why anyone in the world should give a shit about some irrelevant family.

[–] codapine@lemm.ee 15 points 2 days ago

No, but it implies that the brand has attained a certain level of quality to the point where some rich pleb sponges have decided they rather like it. The papers want to know who's shirts you wear...

[–] Sylvartas@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Like it or not (personally I don't) lots of brits care about them. And a surprising amount of non brits too

[–] Coreidan@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Sure but it’s an extreme minority. This is like caring what the kardashians are doing.

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That is, unfortunately, not an extreme minority.

[–] Coreidan@lemmy.world -4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Get out of your bubble. There are 8 billion people on the planet. The combination of the people who care about the Royale family and the kardashians is a minority.

[–] Hawk@lemmynsfw.com 4 points 1 day ago

Not if you take into consideration network effects it's not.

[–] FourPacketsOfPeanuts@lemmy.world 40 points 3 days ago (4 children)

Surprised it didn't happen sooner. Americans don't do chocolate well. They should stick to going to the moon.

[–] MonsterMonster@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago

Here's a little explanation as to the differences with US chocolate.

The bit about Butyric Acid explains why US chocolate tastes literally like vomit; it's the component in vomit that gives it the distinctive taste and smell.

When Hershey's products came to the UK they initially had to be relabelled to reflect the extremely low cocoa content and be called "chocolate flavored candy bar".

Ironically, the article references Cadbury.

[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 35 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Hey! Do you Europeans not appreciate corn in your chocolate or something?!

[–] Archer@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You put a bit of corn in their bread and they legally declare it cake. Can’t win with them

[–] 11111one11111@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Huh? Are you trying to take a swing at corn bread cuz homie, every southern matriarch would like a word. Don't shit on corn bread lol. But for real what is the connection between corn, chocolate and cake. I'll be the first to admit candy corn is candy from Satan's anus. The closest I can gather is carrot cake and that shit is just as good as corn bread if not better.

[–] pupbiru@aussie.zone 15 points 2 days ago (1 children)

i’d say it’s because when you put HFCS in bread in a lot of countries it categorises the thing as cake as far as regulations are concerned

[–] Archer@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] 11111one11111@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

No shit. Worked as a sous chef for years but somehow never made corn bread to know it even had HFCS in it much less how it was viewed in the global culinary community. Good shit, thanks for the knowledge.🍻

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 days ago

Sugar content

In Ireland Subway had to call their bread cake because of the amount of sugar in it

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I'm not being snarky, I swear. But Cadbury eggs were/are super gross. Were those made in America for Americans and you get a different product?

[–] egrets@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago

Creme eggs have been around for 60-odd years. They're crazy sweet and not very high-quality – especially after the Kraft acquisition, as it's not even Cadbury's Dairy Milk any more.

What you get in the US are smaller and made over there by Hershey, so frankly they're probably as bad or worse, but you're not missing out on much.

[–] john89@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 days ago

Never saw the hype behind those.

I'll be real though: chocolate is expensive as fuck and not worth the money.

[–] Coreidan@lemmy.world -5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Huh? Some of the best chocolate is Ghirardelli which is American.

Maybe you just don’t understand American chocolate.

[–] barsoap@lemm.ee 12 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

It's a Swiss-owned company originally founded by an Italian in... barely the US. Two years after California joined the union.

A kilo for forty bucks. Are you kidding me. That's way too cheap to be good cocoa, actually good chocolate costs 150-200 per kg.

milk fat, vanilla extract, natural flavor, soy lecithin.

...it gets worse and worse. You want to see none of those in good chocolate. But at least Lindt checks out as an owner they upcharge you for the gold paint on the packaging and also use cheap cocoa.

Go to Aldi. Buy Moser-Roth. Same quality, priced sensibly. Or treat yourself and buy something from Domori.

[–] bitwise@lemmy.ca 18 points 3 days ago

Why does anyone give a shit about a parasite's tier list? Charlie don't like Cadbury? Meh.

[–] dumbass@leminal.space 1 points 3 days ago

Oooooookay then.