this post was submitted on 23 Dec 2024
27 points (75.5% liked)

Weird News - Things that make you go 'hmmm'

973 readers
2 users here now

Rules:

  1. News must be from a reliable source. No tabloids or sensationalism, please.

  2. Try to keep it safe for work. Contact a moderator before posting if you have any doubts.

  3. Titles of articles must remain unchanged; however extraneous information like "Watch:" or "Look:" can be removed. Titles with trailing, non-relevant information can also be edited so long as the headline's intent remains intact.

  4. Be nice. If you've got nothing positive to say, don't say it.

Violators will be banned at mod's discretion.

Communities We Like:

-Not the Onion

-And finally...

founded 11 months ago
MODERATORS
top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old

This article is completely shit and edited as to omit literally all of the critical information.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/crime/general/homeowner-ends-up-in-jail-after-calling-police-to-remove-squatter-living-inside-her-house/ar-AA1wfyQj

Clearly the same source article, but has several critical pieces of information:

  1. The "squatter"(Johnson) was related to a previously evicted tenant's partner.
  2. Hale forced her way onto the property *and had previous knowledge that Johnson was there, this wasn't a "squatter breaks into home"
  3. Hale had started the process to legally evict Johnson but decided to go do it herself and not wait for the judge to sign the official order.
  4. Hale threatened to "go get her gun", which was recorded.
[–] Greg@lemmy.ca 36 points 3 days ago

Hale (the homeowner) was charged with criminal trespassing and a misdemeanor count of terroristic threats

Maybe this article should have lead with the terroristic threats instead of burying a single mention of it at the end of the article. What a silly ragebait article.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 23 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

There is so much missing from this story it's useless.

a judge ruled that Johnson was not a squatter due to her relation to a previously evicted tenant’s partner

What?! This is a weird story indeed.

a deputy advising Hale to consider the alleged squatter's perspective, noting, "Everybody isn’t as fortunate as you to have a bed."

A cop saying this?! Maybe not ACAB?

charged with criminal trespassing and a misdemeanor count of terroristic threats

She was clearly being a total cunt.

[–] pearsaltchocolatebar@discuss.online 7 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Not really. Squatters rights made it the squatter's property, and if she didn't leave she got arrested.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

I've thought in this since I have 2.4 acres of swamp. Sometimes I meander off my land, and some bits may be on other people's land. (There's a border I haven't mapped and am not clear about.)

So can I just build a cabin out there and call it mine if no one objects in $x time frame? Off to learn about it!

EDIT: Here's the raw (very) basics:

Understanding Florida's Squatter Rights Law

No matter how a squatter ended up on the property, Florida law states that they may be able to gain title and ownership of the property after residing there long-term for seven years. After that, a squatter can start a legal process called adverse possession.

Yes, it's meant to stop land hoarding by allowing people that will actually make use of land to make use of the land. It's a positive thing that will absolutely be removed sooner rather than later as people start losing ownership of land and property ownership becomes the exclusive domain of corporations in the US.