this post was submitted on 05 Dec 2024
311 points (99.7% liked)

Privacy

32642 readers
764 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] iturnedintoanewt@lemm.ee 69 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Can we have the names in the headlines of which MPs keeps consistently putting this crap on the agenda multiple times every year for the last couple of decades?

[–] Churbleyimyam@lemm.ee 6 points 1 month ago

I add my voice to this request. Cough up the names.

[–] Undertaker@feddit.org 51 points 1 month ago (4 children)

To clarify: eMail, web chats, gaming chats, Signal, Threema and so on are affected as well

[–] eleitl@lemm.ee 20 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Self-hosted Matrix is obviously unaffected.

[–] toastal@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You say this but Matrix is largely centralized so it would be easy to get the biggest node to comply. Servers are quite costly to run too which is a big problem.

[–] eleitl@lemm.ee 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Federated protocols are not centralized in principle. It might not scale to one user-one server (which probably even Lemmy can't handle) but if you're signing up for a central server, you're doing it wrong(tm). Don't do that. The nice thing about Matrix client is that it allows end to end encryption, including groups. So that greatly limits what Mallory can do in principle. As to servers being costly to run, given what documented Synapse requirements are, you're looking at less than 5 EUR/month for a single server. Which can be shared among several users, obviously. This is in the same range as costs for a monthly VPN.

[–] EngineerGaming@feddit.nl 9 points 1 month ago (2 children)

His point was the main Matrix.org server being way too prominent. In every given groupchat, chances are somebody is on this particular server. It is also the default for many clients.

[–] toastal@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 month ago

The default links many folks/projects share specifically log you into Element & on Matrix.org as well which advertizes more folks to be on that centralized node. Furthermore, Matrix provides hosting for some of the other big servers as well even if they are not using matrix.org in the address.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] toastal@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 month ago (10 children)

Synapse boasts about 50,000 concurrent users on a node. Ejabberd has been tuned to 2,000,000 concurrent users which shows how efficient & scalable the setup can be. €5/mo is a lot for many folks.

[–] EngineerGaming@feddit.nl 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Monero-paid VPSes cost more, and given this fact, my €5 VPS (with a few other services already running there) would apparently not be enough for Synapse... But an XMPP server runs perfectly.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] airikr@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Self-hosted XMPP using OMEMO included? OMEMO are based on Signal, hence my question.

[–] RubberElectrons@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

First I'd ever heard of OMEMO, thanks dude

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] muntedcrocodile@lemm.ee 22 points 1 month ago (2 children)

The americans seem to have figured out how to get change in relation to health insurance. Perhaps people might consider taking a page from the french history books to get some change on this issue.

[–] JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

The same French of whom more than a third want an authoritarian strongman in power? Personally I would prefer to copy the handful of boring countries where people actually trust their leaders and so don't feel they need to resort to bloody revolution at the drop of a hat.

[–] Hiro8811@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Alright I want all farmers on a 30km range to join our next "peaceful" protest

[–] Manzas@lemdro.id 19 points 1 month ago

Why are they still thinking they can justify this? People which do illegal stuff are just going to use old apps self-host or bypass it with another way.

[–] Emberleaf@lemmy.ml 17 points 1 month ago (1 children)

They can't scan chats that don't exist. Time to make a switch, folks!

[–] Undertaker@feddit.org 7 points 1 month ago (2 children)

A switch to what? To nothing?

[–] eleitl@lemm.ee 8 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Self hosting Matrix comes to mind. With deployment automation it's reasonably painless.

[–] prototype_g2@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You are severally over-estimating the computer skills of the general population. Here is some data on that.

[–] eleitl@lemm.ee 4 points 1 month ago

Thanks. It's slightly worse than I thought. I'm kinda limited to communication with my small peer group, so I don't notice that other user classes exist.

[–] TheWolfOfSouthEnd@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Is that like a decentralised WhatsApp?

[–] Irelephant@lemm.ee 2 points 1 month ago

Its more similar to discord.

[–] toastal@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

WhatsApp runs on unfederated XMPP; why not just run your own decentralized XMPP node?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 month ago

However they want to do it, it will undermine a key principle of democracy and a human right: the right to privacy and private communication.

[–] Dalaryous@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 month ago

Those damn Chinese and their censorship... oh wait

[–] kylian0087@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 month ago

Just watched a video of Low level: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tRATnT577Aw

Although this is about the US this is EXACTLY the shit that will happen to this whole chat scanning BS

[–] x00z@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Some suggestions: Scan, Privacy, Control

[–] b34n5@hexbear.net 2 points 1 month ago

It is the definitive moment to change instant messaging application. I have switched to the XMPP protocol with clients like Gajim or Profanity. There are also applications for smartphones.

load more comments
view more: next ›