this post was submitted on 02 Dec 2024
656 points (95.6% liked)

Science Memes

11552 readers
1247 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Earflap@reddthat.com 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Most likely it just evaporated, or disintegrated or something, but I think its pretty unlikely it survived that absolutely bonkers acceleration.

[–] glibg@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The Parker Solar Probe moves 120 miles per second as it passes around the Sun. That's nearly half a million miles per hour!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parker_Solar_Probe

[–] Comment105@lemm.ee 3 points 1 month ago

Parker Solar Probe: 191 km per second.

Nuclear Manhole Cover: 55 km per second

Voyager 1: 17 km per second

Voyager 2: 15 km per second

[–] DaddleDew@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

In Stargate SG1 they do that to destroy and invading alien ship approaching Earth.

[–] treadful@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 month ago
[–] zante@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 month ago

So has it been replaced ?

[–] sploosh@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

What are the chances it was blasted into the sun?

[–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

If the event was near the equatorial near midday then there's a very very (very) slim chance it was pointed directly at the sun.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›