this post was submitted on 25 Nov 2024
68 points (87.8% liked)

interestingasfuck

6035 readers
228 users here now

interestingasfuck

founded 1 year ago
top 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] stoly@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

I truly don’t see what you want us to pay attention to. I just see a building.

[–] ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org 1 points 26 minutes ago (1 children)
[–] stoly@lemmy.world 1 points 23 minutes ago (1 children)

It turns out that a whole lot of people can only see a photo. There’s no video player.

[–] ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org 2 points 11 minutes ago

Try opening this direct mp4 link in a browser, or embedded:

i hate imgur

[–] tiramichu@lemm.ee 48 points 11 hours ago

If I was driving and saw what seemed to be the exterior cladding of a building collapsing into the street, I'd probably cause an accident trying to swerve out of its way.

[–] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

I wouldn’t mind seeing ads as much if they were all this cool.

[–] BeardedGingerWonder@feddit.uk 5 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Probably what the first person to see a billboard said too.

[–] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 3 hours ago

If every billboard was a Leyendecker I wouldn’t mind them, either!

[–] slazer2au@lemmy.world 6 points 11 hours ago (3 children)

Is this meant to be animated? Looks to be just a still.

[–] ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org 1 points 6 minutes ago

The problem is, OP used a link to the Imgur page
https://imgur.com/YF88VkK
Here is a link to the file:
https://i.imgur.com/YF88VkK.mp4

Both rely on Imgur's willingness to support embedding their media elsewhere, which might vary geographically due to different stages of enshittification by region.

Use Catbox.moe next time.

[–] benignintervention@lemmy.world 9 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

I'm on Voyager and it's just a still image. It's been doing this for a couple weeks

[–] kipo@lemm.ee 2 points 2 hours ago

On Voyager for Android and it's animated.

[–] slazer2au@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Same, Voyager on Android.

On firefox and desktop is fine.

[–] misterdoctor@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Voyager on iOS, static image for me

[–] aeharding@vger.social 2 points 5 hours ago

Maybe a Lemmy.world problem. It worked fine on vger.social.

[–] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 11 hours ago (1 children)
[–] slazer2au@lemmy.world 3 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (2 children)

looks to be a bug in the Android version of Voyager.

[–] stoly@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

iPhone seems to have it as well

[–] doogstar@lemmy.100010101.xyz 3 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

I'm on Android using Voyager 2.19.4 from 17th November, and its working for me

[–] kipo@lemm.ee 1 points 2 hours ago

Same, working fine.

[–] aeharding@vger.social 2 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

I think it’s a Lemmy.world issue. Probably fixed on upgrade

[–] doogstar@lemmy.100010101.xyz 1 points 2 hours ago

Yes, if I switch instance to world then its static. Thanks for your work, really love Voyager!

[–] noxy@yiffit.net -2 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

whoever took this video fucked up by standing still. Move side to side, prove it's actually 3d.

[–] ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org 1 points 21 minutes ago

They only work from one perspective, and expect only the correct-perspective videos to blow up online.

[–] Celestus@lemm.ee 16 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

But it isn’t actually 3D. Those look like big screens, and if the viewing perspective moved, it would break the illusion. In fact, it looks like the perspective was carefully chosen to align the real world with what’s on the screens, to enhance the 3D effect for the viewer

[–] mydoomlessaccount@infosec.pub 1 points 2 hours ago

That, or I was thinking this wasn't even real, and was more of a "proof of concept" video with the ads edited onto the buildings. So, the person would have to stay still to make it easier to overlay the animations onto the building without having to worry about the angle getting messed up and making it too obvious when the angles of the animation and of the building's face don't line up.

I don't really have any definitive proof of that, though, so it's honestly only a guess

[–] noxy@yiffit.net 1 points 5 hours ago

Yeah that was what really had me questioning this