this post was submitted on 20 Jul 2023
55 points (91.0% liked)

Privacy

32457 readers
760 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I currently use Brave and am curious about the pros and cons of both since I see many people recommend Firefox.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] user1919@lemmy.world 73 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If you left chrome thinking brave is not google, both are from companies made for profit. Both are based on chromium. You left one ad company for another.

[–] FarLine99@lemm.ee 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Hardened Firefox (BetterFox user.js config) is my go to. Good browser. Do now want monopoly of Chromium.

[–] XpeeN@sopuli.xyz 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Librewolf & mull are my goto

[–] polyfire@waveform.social 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I recently made the move to librewolf(windows) and mull(android). Essentially just Firefox but with more protection. Super easy switch, hardly notice a difference so far.

[–] NigerianPrince@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I just wanted to switch also this week but I am wondering can you sync your bookmarks etc. between Librewolf and Mull?

[–] polyfire@waveform.social 1 points 1 year ago

Ehh....not sure yet 😅

[–] XpeeN@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

They both use ff sync so yeah

[–] NigerianPrince@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Thank you sir!

[–] carloshr@feddit.cl 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This. I've moved to those browsers some time ago and I'm very satisfied. uBO is also a MUST.

[–] XpeeN@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 year ago

Both install it by default so it's all good, just edit the filter lists

[–] Distributed@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

How does betterFox compare to arkenfox?

[–] Sizably8826@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

betterfox does have privacy resist fingerprint on, so breaks less site.

[–] FarLine99@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

It required less manual tweaking, better defaults for me and many people around.

[–] Arotrios@kbin.social 66 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Brave is not your friend - if they're willing to violate copyright law by secretly scraping websites and then selling the content in their AI, I'm sure they're willing to sell your data if the price is high enough (if they aren't already).

Firefox, on the other hand, has been the most trusted browser since dial-up, and is run by a non-profit. It's an easy choice for me.

[–] digger@latte.isnot.coffee 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Firefox is a little more complicated than that. Yes, the Mozilla Foundation is a non-profit, however it's subsidiary the Mozilla Corporation is not. It's better than Google but like all things, it's worth asking where the money comes from.

[–] Arotrios@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

True. OP looked like s/he wanted a simple answer so I just went with the basics, especially as there's not a noticeable difference in basic browsing performance between the two in their current form (although I think FF is slightly faster right now).

[–] cwade12c@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Brave is open source. You can review and compile from source if you have privacy concerns.

To be completely fair, Mozilla is no angel. They installed extensions in people’s browsers without asking for permission, for example. No thanks.

Librewolf is my recommended go-to from a privacy perspective. And Brave is not horrible. If you look at Brave the company, they aren’t any worse than Mozilla the company.

And if you look at privacy features from a purely test driven point of view, Brave is better than Firefox, and Librewolf is better than both.

https://privacytests.org

[–] QuazarOmega@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Finally someone that is being objective here!
If I had to suggest a browser to a non techie person I'd definitely tell them to use Brave since it's the best middle ground between full privacy to the point of clunkiness and, well... Chrome.
It is still a little invasive by shoving features/ads in your face (wallet, videoconferencing web app, sponsored backgrounds, etc.), but they're less armful than other options and easier to turn off than slightly obscure about:config settings that break the experience of a non privacy concious user

[–] BrikoX@lemmy.zip 26 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Brave is great out of the box experience with a lot of privacy toggles enabled by default. Firefox can be hardened a bit more, but it requires more of a user input. Both are great options, so it mostly comes down to which engine you prefer, Blink or Gecko.

Some people also choose to use Firefox for a simple reason if it not based on Chromium to avoid monopolization.

[–] Umbrias@beehaw.org 27 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Nobody has mentioned librewolf, which is a fantastic out of the box privacy browser. It's a Firefox fork.

[–] manwithabox@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago

This is the way.:)

[–] ItsComplicated@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Is it truly just download and use?

I ask because I am not a tech person. I do not understand how to read or write code, what settings are the ones you need to safely change, etc.

I would happily try Librewolf if the browser is as simple as downloading

[–] nasa1531@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

For the most part it really is. A lot of what it does I would do anyway, but it has that by default, which saves a lot of time for me every time I install it (which is quite often due to my endless distro-hopping). Not everything works perfectly, and a lot of that is intentional (such as spoofing the timezone). I would definitely recommend giving it a shot, and if something doesn't work well you can probably just turn it off (and they'll probably explain how in their FAQ).

Thank you. I will will have to check into it.

[–] Fazoo@lemmy.ml 25 points 1 year ago

Firefox.

Brave team has been caught doing sketchy and controversial things over time, and I personally can't be bothered to support them.

[–] nick26@sh.itjust.works 23 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I’m no privacy savant, but I like Firefox better. I think it has the better “modern” interface. It is less buggy on my laptop, has better scrolling to my eye.

From a philosophical perspective I think the web should support more than one rendering engine.

[–] InFerNo@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

I disable smooth scrolling so my eyes don't have to follow and wait for it to be done scrolling. The scroll height is ingrained so now, on new machines, when it's on it annoys me to no end.

[–] Kushia@lemmy.ml 22 points 1 year ago

I like how Firefox doesn't shove crypto shit down my throat nor want to monitorize my web browsing experience at all.

[–] Dillacorn@lemmy.ml 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Hardend Firefox in incognito or just Librewolf with uBlock Origin, Privacy Badger, and Decentraleyes add-ons along with Mullvad + NextDNS is the best combination. If you can also have pi-hole it can also do a good job at blocking trackers..NextDNS seems to do the job for me though. I use Mull browser on android.

[–] igorlogius@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sorry to bother, but just fyi,

Privacy Badger, doenst bring anything to the table that uBO cant/doenst cover and having mutliple adblockers installed might even make the result unpretictable (the arkenfox wiki, explains that pretty well) Also Decentraleyes is outdated but there is the active fork https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/addon/localcdn-fork-of-decentraleyes/

Hope these infos help or are at least a bit interesting.

[–] Dillacorn@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago

No, you're not a bother at all; this is very informative! I don't personally have the time to delve into the technicalities of why something may be outdated or maybe even redundant. I just kind of follow what has worked for me, as I want to be as anonymous as I can be while browsing the web. Furthermore, I will change Decentraleyes out for LocalCDN; I appreciate this tip.

[–] sajran@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I use Firefox, but only because I really don't want to support Chromium's monopoly. I do think that Chromium based browsers are better though.

[–] igorlogius@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I do think that Chromium based browsers are better though.

In which sense?

[–] poVoq@slrpnk.net 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Self fulfilling prophesy, since some developers think so they only optimize their websites for chromium which in turn makes it true.

But in reality Firefox is perfectly capable and performant enough for everything.

[–] igorlogius@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

firefox recently even caught up to chrome on the speedometer benchmark, which is nice.

[–] starkzarn@infosec.pub 4 points 1 year ago

Firefox recently passed chrome on the speedometer benchmark

[–] sajran@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

This is not backed up by any data, but for me the experience on Chromium based browsers always seems faster and smoother, especially on modern, JS heavy sites.

Also, I'm a sucker for feature rich applications and I really like how much stuff Vivaldi and Brave have built-in. This is extremely subjective though and I know there are many people who consider all of this a terrible bloat.

[–] Vexz@kbin.social 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Oh boy. This is a topic where you pretty much can only lose no matter what you say because everyone has a different opinion. Here's mine.

Imo both are good browsers but they both have their advantages and disadvantages. From my experience Firefox uses telemetry more than Brave when I look at the DNS logs. It needs more tuning to be (more) privacy respecting. Brave does a better job out of the box.

On the other hand there's uBlock Origin. You might have heard of Manifest v3 which is going to kill uBO for all Chromium based browsers. Yes, Brave has its own adblocker but it's not as good as uBO and I doubt it ever will be. Also uBO offers better protection in Firefox than in Chromium based browsers. Though I'm not sure how relevant this is now since the article is over two years old.

I do have to say that I think most people trust Firefox (or Mozilla) too much. Maybe Mozilla respects your privacy more than other browser developers but I still don't think they are very trustworthy. The problem is that you don't have much of a choice. Either you trust any browser developer or you go off of the internet or you develop your own browser.

So for now you're fine with either browser but when there will be no support for Manifest v3 on Chromium based browsers anymore you should go with Firefox. Firefox is never a bad choice, even now.

[–] Kissaki@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

but I still don’t think they are very trustworthy

How so? Why is that?

[–] Vexz@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

There are many reasons. One of the reasons is this sneaky one.

Then there's more than enough telemetry Mozilla makes use of in Firefox you need to disable in about:config where most users don't even look. Lookup the following options:

  • browser.tabs.crashReporting.sendReport
  • datareporting.policy.dataSubmissionEnabled
  • datareporting.healthreport.uploadEnabled
  • toolkit.coverage.endpoint.base
  • toolkit.coverage.opt-out
  • toolkit.telemetry.coverage.opt-out

Everytime you start Firefox it sends your location to Mozilla. Lookup these options:

  • Region.current
  • Region.home
  • browser.region.update.enabled
  • browser.region.network.url

These are just a few things Mozilla does and pretty much nobody talks about because they are considered trustworthy. But let's be real here: Trust is good, control is better. That's why I made some research about Mozilla and found out about the above things.

[–] nomadjoanne@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

I love how much you can pimp out Firefox with custom CSS style sheets. However, the number one reason I use it is to show the internet that not everyone wants to just surrender to Chromium (and Google). If I could donate specifically to Firefox development, I would.

I have Brave as a backup and still use it from time to time. It's a good browser. Privacy-wise it is probably better than vanilla Firefox but inferior to Librewolf (a security-hardened Firefox fork).

[–] Autumbloom@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago
[–] guttermonk@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago

Firefox has one of my favorite privacy extensions that creates containers to group your tabs into, and I haven't found an equivalent for chrome based browsers: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/multi-account-containers/

But if you like crypto, I'd go with Brave. Firefox recently broke a bunch of browser wallet / hardware wallet integrations by ditching U2F on the latest release without giving any of the big wallet programmers a heads up.

[–] ozoned@beehaw.org 4 points 1 year ago

Firefox is the only choice for me at this point.

load more comments
view more: next ›