this post was submitted on 18 Nov 2024
379 points (98.7% liked)

Technology

59441 readers
3634 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Note: Original report by Bloomberg, article by Reuters proxied by Neuters to bypass paywall.

(page 2) 31 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 9 points 13 hours ago (4 children)

What's to stop them just making another browser?

[–] btaf45@lemmy.world 8 points 11 hours ago (3 children)

What’s to stop them just making another browser?

Nothing. Chromium is open source. So they could just fork it and declare a new "official" google browser and it would be a lot like Chrome.

I'm not sure why the govt thinks forcing google to give up a particular fork/branch of an open source browser is all that meaningful. It might make more sense if Chrome was a closed source one of a kind browser.

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 3 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

That's exactly what I was thinking. It also makes Chrome essentially worthless to anyone except Google.

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 1 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Maybe as a whole package, but node.js servers are ubiquitous and have a ton of stakeholders that have nothing to do with web browsers.

[–] btaf45@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

What does Chrome have to do with a node.js server?

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 2 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Same JS engine, same maintainers, same iron-grip control by Google.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 8 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Not needed. Internet Explorer existed for years after the 90s. It wasn't killed by the courts. It was killed by the fact that it's only function was to install a better browser on first boot.

[–] cdf12345@lemm.ee 8 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

I think you are severely underestimating how many people don’t even understand the difference between windows, explorer, a web browser and even the Internet itself during the 90’s well into the 2000’s even 2010’s.

That’s who kept IE alive

[–] atrielienz@lemmy.world 5 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 1 minute ago)

No offense but it was the US Government. Most of their websites were coded for it, and quite a few of them didn't work properly or reliably in other browsers as a result. This was true up until it was sunsetted and they were forced to update to Edge and some of the websites still haven't been properly moved over to Chromium. When the pandemic hit and the Armed Forces had to setup remote work for thousands of people Microsoft basically built them a fork of Teams. The US Government is kind of running hand in hand with Microsoft on a lot of stuff if you just hazard a cursory look.

[–] ShepherdPie@midwest.social 10 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

With blackjack and hookers?

[–] AdamEatsAss@lemmy.world 4 points 12 hours ago

I'm 40% internet browser.

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee -2 points 13 hours ago

Potentially.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 3 points 11 hours ago

They didn't make the first one! They got it from Apple, who themselves got it from KDE.

[–] MCasq_qsaCJ_234@lemmy.zip 5 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

What if Linux foundation buys Chrome?

[–] Joker@sh.itjust.works 5 points 12 hours ago

They already have Servo.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 2 points 11 hours ago

HA!

What a joke.

[–] btaf45@lemmy.world -5 points 7 hours ago (5 children)

[Google controls how people view the internet]

This doesn't quite make sense. How does Chrome "control how people view the internet"? Isn't html/css the main thing that controls how people view the internet?

[ and what ads they see in part through its Chrome browser, which typically uses Google search,]

But it is trivial to change your default search agent right?

Is this move something we should view as a good thing, and if so, then why?

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] ptz@dubvee.org 3 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Ugh. Just link to Reuters.

[–] Joker@sh.itjust.works 12 points 14 hours ago (2 children)
[–] woelkchen@lemmy.world 13 points 14 hours ago

It has a soft paywall.

I think the common practice is to link to the original in the URL bar and then use the body text to do paywall/loginwall removals.

[–] danc4498@lemmy.world -1 points 13 hours ago

This is probably the real reason corporate America had no interest in endorsing Harris.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›