this post was submitted on 18 Nov 2024
74 points (97.4% liked)

politics

19107 readers
5319 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] breadsmasher@lemmy.world 41 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

reminder that musk’s successful companies have an entire team dedicated “managing” musk to have as little input into the actual business as possible.

[–] TimeSquirrel@kbin.melroy.org 5 points 3 hours ago

Gwynne Shotwell pulling us into the future of spaceflight despite Musk.

[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 17 points 3 hours ago (3 children)

I still can't get past the government efficiency department being chaired by two people.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 2 points 30 minutes ago

Also, there are two efficiency departments?

[–] qantravon@lemmy.world 8 points 2 hours ago

It's also a redundant department. There is already the Government Accountability Office, which literally does the same job (but probably actually does it efficiently).

[–] whithom@discuss.online 4 points 3 hours ago

Not very efficient?

[–] metaStatic@kbin.earth 4 points 3 hours ago (2 children)
[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 2 points 29 minutes ago

Yeah. Companies with seagull managers probably manage to survive under dopey mantras like move fast and break things - or not - but it's only a company.

Seagull managers at the level of government - breaking things has a whole new meaning.

[–] whithom@discuss.online 7 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

… and let someone else clean up the mess

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 1 points 27 minutes ago* (last edited 27 minutes ago)

Democrats. They always have to fix the mess of the Republican shit-gibbons, and then get blamed when they don't fix it fast enough. Or if doing it while being Blah. The fear of someone doing it while having a va-jay-jay is one so great that no women can get into office.

[–] LuxSpark@lemmy.cafe 3 points 3 hours ago (1 children)
[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 1 points 27 minutes ago

"We're going to have an innovation sprint, but in the government! What could go wrong?"