this post was submitted on 18 Nov 2024
664 points (94.4% liked)

196

16747 readers
1882 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] DerKommissar@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

"The pure (libertarian) socialists ideological anticipations remain untainted by existing practice. They do not explain how the manifold functions of a revolutionary society would be organized, how external attack and internal sabotage would be thwarted, how bureaucracy would be avoided, scarce resources allocated, policy differences settled, priorities set, and production and distribution conducted.

Instead, they offer vague statements about how the workers themselves will directly own and control the means of production and will arrive at their own solutions through creative struggle. No surprise then that the pure socialists support every revolution except the ones that succeed." - Michael Parenti, "Blackshirts and Reds"

[–] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (16 children)

anti imperialist/colonial supporters when they find out that the entire timeline of human history is conquest, colonialism, and imperialism.

[–] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 month ago

Feudalism dominated throughout human history, yet kings and queens have been dethroned in a good portion of the world.

[–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

It absolutely is, but my take on that is we're just bad at doing community-based government and need more practice.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›