this post was submitted on 19 Jul 2023
450 points (98.9% liked)

Work Reform

10012 readers
224 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Metaright@kbin.social 53 points 1 year ago (1 children)

tHeY'rE jUsT pRiVaTe CoNtRaCtOrS

[–] 001100010010@lemmy.dbzer0.com 34 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Well in this case, they were actually an employee working for doordash (they were not a delivery driver).

[–] Metaright@kbin.social 33 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is what I get for not bothering to read the article before opening my dumb mouth.

[–] sadreality@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago

assumed the same

Hey... it aint much but it is honest work to get it wrong and be correct for all of us!

[–] Streetdog@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Even more reason to avoid DoorTrash.

[–] MaxVoltage@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Dude I see those guys in the dash store behind glass they are in like a little prison Sorry kind of tipsy 🥴

[–] nucawysi@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

yea cuz the drivers are too dumb to organize one................?

[–] Haemaker@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago

"Fired for insubordination"

"Yeah! They kept trying to form a union when we told them not to!"

[–] aaron_griffin@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago

Oh damn, Doordash is gonna be found guilty and they're gonna have to pay a $2000 fine, and everything will be fixed!

[–] Justice@lemmygrad.ml 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

In some mythological sane world unions would be mandated in every industry… but even in a less shitty world than ours this should result in firing and jailing of the person who directly decided to fire this person and the CEO. Maybe 10 years and seize all their assets and properties. Also fine the company 5% of its entire estimated value (calculated by some agency and not based on any bullshit accounting tricks. Just straight up add all their assets up, cut 5% off, fuck em).

And yes this IS intended to destroy companies who do this. Kind of being nice if anything since it effectively gives them multiple fuckups before they probably go under- for which all the executive officers would be personally financially responsible. Capitalists should have all their property and assets seized, but barring that, if the hypothetical leaders are too liberal, this would be an effective long term way of destroying them. Or letting them destroy themselves anyway since they’re all criminal scum who couldn’t resist the greed even if it meant their utter destruction.

Unfortunately in reality nothing will happen besides maybe a juicy civil suit but not nearly enough to actually correct for the firing nor enough to force the company to never even think about this again. The law is unenforceable basically if it doesn’t cause the destruction of the ones who break it and the dissolution of the company who allow it. It’s just a fee for them to pay to then be able to squash unions. Shithole country.

[–] CoderKat@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah. Whoever gave the order to fire these people and those who actuated it (if different) should go to jail. Corporations for whatever batshit reason are constantly treated with kids gloves. They'll only ever get fined most of the time. Yet, corporations are just groups of individuals. Some individual (or individuals) gave this order. They should be arrested.

This shouldn't be civil, it should be criminal. If spray painting a statue can get people arrested, so too should illegally firing them (especially in a way like this, which is extremely bad for workers rights as a whole).

[–] GlitzyArmrest@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

for whatever batshit reason

Money and greed.

[–] e_t_@kbin.pithyphrase.net 4 points 1 year ago

That's a p̶a̶d̶d̶l̶i̶n̶' nominal fine

[–] e_t_@kbin.pithyphrase.net 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

That's a ~paddlin'~ nominal fine

load more comments
view more: next ›