this post was submitted on 19 Jul 2023
322 points (98.5% liked)

politics

18898 readers
3830 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] KuchiKopi@lemmy.world 60 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Ron Johnson took his oath of office on his cum-stained copy of Atlas Shrugged.

[–] cpo@lemmy.world 27 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Lemmy starts to feel like home with comments like these 😅.

I'm a fresh lemmy convert and I'm amazed how usable it is!

[–] SocialEngineer55@lemmy.one 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] cpo@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

On Android 😁

[–] comedy@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

(Jizz)Fountainhead

[–] oleorun@lemmy.world 33 points 1 year ago

He has done so much to destroy Wisconsin. Him, Vos, scoots mcbaldy, Fitzgerald...

I am still just unable to understand why people voted in this married into money asshole over Russ Feingold. I can't comprehend it.

[–] kn0wmad1c@programming.dev 18 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Pretty sure this is illegal.

[–] ImpressiveBarnacle@kbin.social 13 points 1 year ago

Pretty sure they don't really care. They're there to steal, not have moral quandaries.

[–] dreadgoat@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

It's legal and really a non-story. There's plenty of shit to be angry at GOPers about without writing misleading headlines.

Rich guy wants to run a political campaign, so he takes out loans to pay for it. At the same time, he asks for donations to support the campaign. Afterwards, he may use those donations to pay back the loans which were taken out to fund the campaign. What is the problem here? This is just how funding works.

The story is written as though he is being deceptive, when in reality all he is saying is that he doesn't expect the donations he receives to line up with the amount of money he took out in loans to fund the campaign. That's fine, he's just paying for it out of his own pocket.

What WOULD be an issue is if these loans that he took out specifically for campaigning were misappropriated and allocated for personal use. THAT is illegal. But as of yet there is no proof of that, just whining that he's rich enough to pull a bunch of money out the bank for a campaign (which is a problem with the system, but not really with him as an individual)

[–] blanketswithsmallpox@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It just shows how rich you have to be to REALLY be a politician most of the time. He took the loans out for 2010 and 2016...

In 2009 he was worth $17.9 million, in 2010 he was worth $46.95 million... a nearly 250% increase in a year... 1/4 his net worth in loans for CAMPAIGNING if split evenly between the campaigns. I wonder how the approval process for something like this works...

In 2015 he was worth $36.68 million, in 2016 he was worth $27.61 million...

https://www.opensecrets.org/personal-finances/ron-johnson/net-worth?cid=N00032546&year=2018

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah, I want someone to ELI5 how he can get away with this.

[–] TheKingBee@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

Well that's ridiculous. SCOTUS strikes again.

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Should be, but it isn't. Our system is corrupt as fuck.

[–] kokiriflute@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

Campaign donations are just bribes. Politicians are criminals.

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I'm skeptical of rawstory.com to contextualize how common this is, but is very clearly evident that this problem of blatantly profiteering off political office is only getting worse and stupider.

load more comments
view more: next ›