this post was submitted on 11 Nov 2024
13 points (100.0% liked)

TechTakes

1397 readers
170 users here now

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Need to let loose a primal scream without collecting footnotes first? Have a sneer percolating in your system but not enough time/energy to make a whole post about it? Go forth and be mid: Welcome to the Stubsack, your first port of call for learning fresh Awful you’ll near-instantly regret.

Any awful.systems sub may be subsneered in this subthread, techtakes or no.

If your sneer seems higher quality than you thought, feel free to cut’n’paste it into its own post — there’s no quota for posting and the bar really isn’t that high.

The post Xitter web has spawned soo many “esoteric” right wing freaks, but there’s no appropriate sneer-space for them. I’m talking redscare-ish, reality challenged “culture critics” who write about everything but understand nothing. I’m talking about reply-guys who make the same 6 tweets about the same 3 subjects. They’re inescapable at this point, yet I don’t see them mocked (as much as they should be)

Like, there was one dude a while back who insisted that women couldn’t be surgeons because they didn’t believe in the moon or in stars? I think each and every one of these guys is uniquely fucked up and if I can’t escape them, I would love to sneer at them.

Last week's thread

(Semi-obligatory thanks to @dgerard for starting this)

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] rook@awful.systems 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] gerikson@awful.systems 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] bitofhope@awful.systems 10 points 1 day ago

Didn't have that on my bingo card for this year, but it's on brand. A big part of The Onion's MO is just riding out the insanity and inject a little of their own.

[–] swlabr@awful.systems 21 points 2 days ago

Folks, huge W today. I was hanging out with my parents today and my mother was scrolling her feed, commenting out loud about everything she saw when she came across some autoplag content. “This is fake!” she said, and I could not be prouder. Not just because she IDed the slop, but because it meant she at least has a better brain than my trumper family members that habitually repost trumper slop.

Cherry on top: she showed me a text chain where she was trolling a “my phone died, this is my new number” scammer.

[–] BlueMonday1984@awful.systems 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Got recommended a video from a friend, and its a damn good sneer at the state of YouTube sponsorships:

Why YouTube Sponsors Are (Almost) Always Terrible

load more comments (1 replies)

I know we're trying to cut back on the US politics for the sake of everyone's sanity, but Musk getting sneered by his own confabulator is still pretty good.

[–] BlueMonday1984@awful.systems 8 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)
[–] sailor_sega_saturn@awful.systems 15 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yeah it's sad. As the article points out similar incidents have happened repeatedly. Anyone who saw the door design could have (and did!) predict something like this would happen. My coworker was trapped in his Tesla in his garage for 15 minutes (and he wasn't in a panic).

Look at the picture of the manual door release here: It's pretty well hidden, you reach in and pull up on the door buttons.

... then scroll down and look at the picture of the rear door manual release. You have to pull off some trim from inside the pocket, pull off another panel, and then pull a cable.

... but wait! There's more!

Note: Not all Model Y vehicles are equipped with a manual release for the rear doors.

Jesus, I hope the engineers who signed off on this think about what they've done and do better. I would say I hope someone regulated bad emergency door releases out of existence but... y'know.

[–] Soyweiser@awful.systems 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Imagine what other flaws these cars have if the tried to 'innovate' like this on the solved technology that is fucking doors.

[–] sailor_sega_saturn@awful.systems 12 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

The lack of a speedometer in front of your face is a pretty glaring quality issue. You have to turn your head to look at the massive touchscreen. The one that replaces all other dashboards and most tactile controls ~~for manufacturing cost savings~~ to be a cool futuristic vehicle of the future.

I won't even start talking about the whole CyberStuck thing again because that's too easy; except to point out that it has turn buttons on the steering wheel instead of a turn signal stalk, a shifter on the ceiling, and the steering wheel is not round.

I only recently bought my first car and it's just old enough that it didn't even have a backup camera until I got one installed. Honestly half the reason of buying used was so I could have a car without a touchscreen haha.

[–] o7___o7@awful.systems 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

ofc it comes with a square wheel.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] swlabr@awful.systems 11 points 3 days ago

Just a general comment on the state of things. Now that Musk has fused with the ideological flesh chimera of the next US government and is tapping others to be absorbed, any US politics will be TechTakes-adjacent. Perhaps some ground rules must be set so we aren't drowned in non-procedurally generated slop.

Either way, I'm cutting back on the musk unless it is directly sneerable.

[–] BlueMonday1984@awful.systems 15 points 3 days ago (6 children)

Elon Musk, Ramaswamy land Trump admin roles

President-elect Trump has tapped tech entrepreneurs Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy to lead an advisory group focused on cutting federal spending and reducing the size of the government.

Trump announced Tuesday that Musk and Ramaswamy would lead his “Department of Government Efficiency” (DOGE), an initiative meant to “slash excess regulations, cut wasteful expenditures” and restructure federal agencies.

We live in the dumbest timeline

[–] sc_griffith@awful.systems 18 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I wasn't expecting complete fascist victory to be so... cringe

[–] swlabr@awful.systems 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] swlabr@awful.systems 13 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] BigMuffin69@awful.systems 9 points 2 days ago

I voted for Liz in 2020 :( instead they gave me diamond joe

[–] Amoeba_Girl@awful.systems 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

This is literally going to be an embezzlement op isn't it

[–] BlueMonday1984@awful.systems 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Its gonna be the largest embezzlement scheme in US history, that much I'm certain. How much damage the pair will do to the federal gov I'm not sure, but I expect there won't be much left of it once they're done.

[–] cstross@wandering.shop 7 points 2 days ago (4 children)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] mii@awful.systems 8 points 3 days ago

Such meme. Much wow. I see we’re continuing with giving dumb names to everything the Muskrat is involved in. Glad that hasn’t changed.

[–] bitofhope@awful.systems 5 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Kabosu didn't die for this.

[–] kgMadee2@mathstodon.xyz 4 points 3 days ago

@BlueMonday1984 I am dead. From Fremdschämen

[–] Architeuthis@awful.systems 8 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (3 children)

The job site decided to recommend me an article calling for the removal of most human oversight from military AI on grounds of inefficiency, which is a pressing issue since apparently we're already living in the Culture.

The Strategic Liability of Human Oversight in AI-Driven Military Operations

Conclusion

As AI technology advances, human oversight in military operations, though rooted in ethics and legality, may emerge as a strategic liability in future AI-dominated warfare.

~~Oh unknowable genie of the sketchily curated datasets~~ Claude, come up with an optimal ratio of civilian to enemy combatant deaths that will allow us to bomb that building with the giant red cross that you labeled an enemy stronghold.

~~As AI technology advances, human oversight in military operations, though rooted in~~ ethics and legality, may emerge as a strategic liability ~~in future AI-dominated warfare~~.

[–] o7___o7@awful.systems 8 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

This is awful for sure, but thankfully low impact. Turns out that this Terminator Enjoyer is an unemployed idea guy. Maybe he's wrangling for an IDF contract?

From jobbie site:

"An accomplished manager, with expertise in developing innovative concepts and ideas into client services operations and streamlining delivery of products/services within Defence / Cyber Security and Information Technology industry."

and

Technology and Innovation executive , Currently on short sabbatical May 2024 - Present 7 months

Also, the image is perfect. I especially like the Joe Kucan-looking general embedded in the star trek tactical station. The Technology of Peace ain't what it used to be, is it?

[–] self@awful.systems 10 points 2 days ago

human oversigh :(

and daiquiri nominations :)

[–] JFranek@awful.systems 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Also, I the image is perfect. I especially like the Joe Kucan-looking general embedded in the star trek tactical station. The Technology of Peace ain’t what it used to be, is it?

Is that a screenshot from Command&Conquer 4?

[–] o7___o7@awful.systems 6 points 2 days ago

what if C&4, but in the metaverse?

[–] istewart@awful.systems 6 points 2 days ago

Eliminating Mothman is our prime strattgic priority

Private Bbailcy! I see you back there! Cut it out with the oversighing, you're dragging down morale KPIs for this quarter!

[–] mii@awful.systems 9 points 3 days ago (2 children)

So, ethics and legality are strategic liabilities? Jesus fucking Christ, that’s not even sneer-worthy. This guy is completely fucking insane.

[–] Architeuthis@awful.systems 7 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

If you've convinced yourself that you'll mostly be fighting the AIs of a rival always-chaotic-evil alien species or their outgroup equivalent, you probably think they are.

Otherwise I hope shooting first and asking questions later will probably continue to be frowned upon in polite society even if it's automated agents doing the shooting.

[–] skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

This is straight up Hague material right there, all he wants is plausible deniability

Computer said so 🥺

e: that's a shit take for several reasons and we have autonomous killers already. it's called air defense (in some modes) because how many civilians are going at mach fuck with RCS of 0.1m^2, that's no civilian that's ballistic missile. also lmao at speed of decision

perun video on this topic https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=tou8ahLZvP4

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›