this post was submitted on 07 Nov 2024
435 points (98.9% liked)

Science Memes

10928 readers
2405 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 34 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] deaf_fish@lemm.ee 7 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

And I love them for it. Seriously comfortable society is built on and by nerds.

[–] slice@feddit.org 1 points 4 hours ago

Yeah I love it too. It was quite an interesting deep dive into that topic.

[–] superkret@feddit.org 54 points 1 day ago (4 children)

If you want a clear definition, ask a mathematician:

A word is any written product of group elements and their inverses.

Or a computer scientist:

A word is a fixed-sized datum handled as a unit by the instruction set or the hardware of the processor.

[–] Malgas@beehaw.org 3 points 12 hours ago

Or, in either field (formal language theory bridges both) it can mean any string of symbols, letters, or tokens.

[–] affiliate@lemmy.world 3 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

i wonder what the inverse of the letters in the english alphabet are. since it has a non-prime number of letters (26 to be exact), we know that some letters won’t have inverses. i wonder which letters don’t have inverses. i guess it would be pretty easy to find out if you use the standard alphabet ordering and then port the alphabet over to ℤ/26ℤ, but that’s not a particularly satisfying answer.

[–] circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 9 points 1 day ago

Maybe ironically, neither one would be appropriate as a linguistic definition.

[–] folekaule@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago
[–] carotte@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 1 day ago
[–] Hupf@feddit.org 1 points 17 hours ago

What is Truth and what is God?

[–] archonet@lemy.lol 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] slice@feddit.org 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

From which Tom Scott video is this ?

[–] Mango@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 17 hours ago

"what" is a word, correct.

[–] SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 20 hours ago

vsauce music starts playing

[–] wandermind@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

As a linguist, I'd just shrug.

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

"everyone knows what a word is, that is the definion"

[–] shneancy@lemmy.world 4 points 9 hours ago

the cries of alien archaeologists from the far future echo in the distance

[–] four@lemmy.zip 33 points 1 day ago (5 children)

"word" is a four letter word

[–] dessimbelackis@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I think you’ll find that in actual fact “bird” is the word

[–] prex@aussie.zone 4 points 22 hours ago (1 children)
[–] spicytuna62@lemmy.world 1 points 13 hours ago

Don't you know? About the bird?

[–] Entropywins@lemmy.world 1 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

And it begins...probably be 2 days until I get the song out of my head

[–] orb360@lemmy.ca 2 points 21 hours ago

My body is ready!

[–] angrystego@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago

Birds are not real, though, are they?

[–] railwhale@lemmy.nz 4 points 1 day ago

Recursive ~~acronyms~~ definitions

[–] funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago

that's a bit wordy

[–] lugal@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Please, it's w*rd, we want to keep this f*mily friendly

[–] tdawg@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] lugal@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 day ago

Watch your l*nguage, my dear

[–] lugal@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 day ago

Still even people new to writing have a good intuition about that but formalizing this intuition is a different story

Saussure feelings