this post was submitted on 06 Nov 2024
238 points (92.2% liked)

News

23287 readers
5390 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Democrats bet on appeals to neoconservatives — including war criminals like Dick Cheney — and touted harsh border policies, bolstering rather than challenging Republican anti-immigrant frameworks.

Kamala Harris may have relied on women to vote for abortion rights, but she promised little more than a potential return to the flawed and insufficient norm of Roe v. Wade, at best. Like President Joe Biden, she supported a genocide and failed to distinguish herself from extremist Zionists like Trump.

For Democrats, appealing to the right has been a disaster of realpolitik, especially in an electoral system that structurally favors Republicans anyway. But what’s worse, Democratic strategies have failed and harmed the most vulnerable communities both in the U.S. and those who suffer under the yoke of U.S.-backed wars.

There is an urgent need for social justice movement organizing, growing unions and union power, antagonism rather than acquiescence to existing power structures, and expansive networks of care and support. The most powerful social movements of the last decades did not primarily build on support from Democratic leadership under Bill Clinton, Barack Obama, or Joe Biden. Nor did they collapse during Trump’s first tenure.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] GrymEdm@lemmy.world 34 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (3 children)

As a foreigner looking in, I'm worried about how things like widespread protest suppression and union-busting will affect the called-for attempts at change. Some of that stuff was bipartisan, and it's unlikely to get better now that the far right has control of the Presidency, Senate, SCOTUS, and perhaps the House.

[–] CmdrShepard42@lemm.ee 25 points 9 hours ago

It's definitely a valid concern. In 2020, Trump had federal police descend on Portland in plain clothes and unmarked vans to literally kidnap protestors off the streets.

[–] WanderingVentra@lemm.ee 19 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

Oh it's 100% going to suck for sure. It will be hard and difficult and painful. But our ancestors fought for unions when unions were illegal, and union busting didn't just mean saying "stop" or "you're all fired", it meant hiring private mercenaries to spray bullets into crowds and beat unarmed people with sticks. Women got the right to vote with protests and were often arrested for vandalism, arson, and all sorts of shit they did during them (and for prohibition, which I know didn't really work, but hey, they got that amendment in anyway).

And I don't even mean ancient ancestors, I mean like great grandparents. If they did it, so can we.

[–] SkyNTP@lemmy.ml 8 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Less surveillance and death machines back then. Resistance will be harder.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Xaphanos@lemmy.world 5 points 6 hours ago

My GG grandfather was killed when soldiers fired into an unarmed crowd that was protesting for basic human rights. This was in Marineo, Sicily, on 3 January 1894. His widow had to flee to the NYC tenements with their 6 children to start fresh - as progressive sympathizers were not safe.

She was poor in Sicily, she was destitute when she arrived in the US. Like many others, she did garment piece work to get by. Other Sicilian immigrants arrived in a wave and they made a new community.

When the Triangle Fire happened, real labor reform began to happen through the work of the ILGWU and others. They did not stop protesting until they got results.

Yes. Hard times ahead. Hard times behind may show us the way forward. Ad astra per áspera.

[–] WanderingVentra@lemm.ee 3 points 10 hours ago

Oh it's 100% going to suck for sure. It will be hard and difficult and painful. But our ancestors fought for unions when unions were illegal, and union busting didn't just mean saying "stop" or "you're all fired", it meant hiring private mercenaries to spray bullets into crowds and beat unarmed people with sticks. Women got the right to vote with protests and were often arrested for vandalism, arson, and all sorts of shit they did during them (and for prohibition, which I know didn't really work, but hey, they got that amendment in anyway).

And I don't even mean ancient ancestors, I mean like great grandparents. If they did it, so can we.

[–] venusaur@lemmy.world 51 points 11 hours ago (5 children)

Need more options. Ranked Choice Voting.

[–] cheese_greater@lemmy.world 34 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (2 children)

This is the breaking point where the Dems are going to have to collectively realize and commit to learning from their mistakes.

That Trump was successfull is an indictment of their approach that failed with Clinton and failed again with Harris. They need to invert, maybe they need to start campaigning on fear and hate (of fascism and what it does to the average person and how it sows the seeds of the nation's destruction including gas prices and bread but also the circuses and people we all love that are no less parts of human life itself.

Maybe start getting their hands a little dirtier. This is an existential war at this point, gloves need to come off and the old guard probably needs to fuck off like forever.

[–] venusaur@lemmy.world 22 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (2 children)

They’ve been campaigning on fear. The Democratic party is not going to save you. They never were. Their empty promises are carrots they dangle to get your votes. They haven’t tried hatred yet, but I think that’s reserved for the uneducated.

Aside from the abomination that is the two party system and electoral college, the real problem is that we are trying to set the same rules across a country that is too big and too divisive to possibly work for everybody. I think it’s time for liberal bubbles to actually secede.

CA and NY make up about 21% of GDP and they contain about 18% of population. Other states are welcome to join. They’d be fine on their own and they’d have land on either coast.

That, or implement tariffs between blue and red states.

Liberals could also leave their bubbles and move to swing states.

Hyperbolic, but in actuality it’s the only way to get what you want, else half of the country is always going to be feeling how everybody on Lemmy is feeling today.

[–] WanderingVentra@lemm.ee 9 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

I hate to say it, because being together makes us stronger and I'd hate to need a passport to visit my friends in other states, but I think I might be with you. It's not like we've ever done anything good with our united strength anyway except for stomp around the world taking resources and sparking coups (except once in WW2). Our empire needs to crumble, like England, France, Spain, and Portgual's. It's too big, too unwieldy, too hard to make change or improve things and get consensus from this wide area. Plus, it's a lot easier to fight for our rights if we just need to travel a couple hundred miles to a state capital rather than across the country to Washington, DC or to convince Southern and Midwestern rural voters.

[–] venusaur@lemmy.world 5 points 9 hours ago

Yeah we’re such a young nation. We’re destined to experience the changes that other nations have.

The other option is to dilute swing states with an influx of liberals, but doesn’t solve the problem of half the country feeling unrepresented.

[–] lemonmelon@lemmy.world 3 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

As if they'd let you secede.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] zerog_bandit@lemmy.world 4 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

When you say get our hands dirtier or gloves coming off, what do you mean?

[–] superkret@feddit.org 2 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

They mean triggering a Civil War that will likely kill millions of people, but they aren't going to come out and say it.

[–] Bustedknuckles@lemmy.world 23 points 10 hours ago (3 children)

We tried in Oregon. The real problem is that both Democrat establishment and Republican establishment hate RCV because it diminishes their power. It may be time for progressives to separate from Dems a bit more at local and state levels. Look at Osborn in NE

[–] sandwichsaregood@lemmy.world 7 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (2 children)

RCV was also on the ballot in Colorado, but for some reason they bundled it with a "jungle primary" for governor and a bunch of other seats, where the four choices on the ballot for governor in the general election would be the top four from the ranked choice primaries, regardless of party (so you could end up with four options from the same party in theory). The latter addition was pretty unpopular with both parties, who put out tons of messaging against it and especially conflated it with RCV. It got voted down with a significant margin.

I'm not opposed to either measure, but I'm really struggling to understand why they rolled the two together into one ballot initiative instead of separating it. Alas, I'm just a lowly voter not privy to such advanced political reasoning. Fortunately most of Colorado's other ballot initiatives went well, at least according to my preferences.

[–] cm0002@lemmy.world 3 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

I'm not opposed to either measure, but I'm really struggling to understand why they rolled the two together into one ballot initiative instead of separating it.

It was backed and bankrolled by some local rich fuck and "adjusted" to benefit the rich ofc. It's good that it failed IMO, unsure what Oregon's deal about it was though

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] venusaur@lemmy.world 4 points 9 hours ago

Some counties in Oregon use RCV or Star for some elections. It’s progress.

But I agree, nobody wants to love power on either side so there’s no support. Dems are not our saviors. Up to the people.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CmdrShepard42@lemm.ee 15 points 9 hours ago

We had it on the ballot here in Oregon, and it got rejected. It probably didn't help that I didn't see a single bit of outreach from state Dems who've been controlling the state for the past 40 years, but that's probably because they're more concerned about retaining power for the party than actually fixing things, so they didn't want it to pass.

[–] ravhall@discuss.online 2 points 10 hours ago (7 children)

You’re never going to vote on a national level again, what use is ranked at this point?

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 49 points 11 hours ago

We'll see if any of that comes to fruition, or is allowed to do so by the fascists just put into power, unlike the last thousand times the far-right in a country has won elections.

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 32 points 12 hours ago (2 children)
[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 9 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

The answer will depend on what orgs are in your local area. If you’re willing to share a general location and any specific interests I could do some digging.

I don’t know anything about this site but I just found it by searching: https://www.mutualaidhub.org/

Or if you’d rather search on your own, I’d look for things like [your city/region] mutual aid, resist, antifa (the last one going to be about more confrontational action so consider whether that’s your specific niche).

Another approach is to just ask friends who seem politically connected if they’ve heard of any local orgs.

Personally I would be wary of any highly top-down orgs that enforce a particular narrow ideology. Some of these can be a bit cult-like. Also get a feel for how people interact and leadership operates. Are people supportive and kind to one another or is there a lot of tension and fear? Personally I haven’t had any bad experiences yet but it’s something to be aware of if you don’t have the lay of the land in your local area.

In most cities there will be a variety of groups with different approaches and focuses, so shop around a bit and find the one that is a good fit for you.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 21 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

That's always the question, isn't it? Like the people on Lemmy who keep calling for revolution. Okay, when and where are we meeting with the torches and pitchforks?

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 18 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (1 children)

Mutual Aid is far more useful than revolution. In this kind of environment, the act of helping one another is revolutionary.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 7 points 11 hours ago

We are hoping for aid from this group. I'm trying to formulate an email right now.

https://www.mosaictrust.org.uk/

[–] nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

Do you really wonder why people dont post meetups for revolutionary activity or other incriminating things on a public forum that has an explicit no violence rule?

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 4 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Not really. I'm sure they happily do their revolution cosplay somewhere else. Wake me up when the revolution actually happens because I'm 47 and I've been hearing about it for decades and I'm not getting any younger.

[–] nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (15 children)

How do you think revolution works? You cannot simply violently take to the streets whenever you feel like it. You need to build up critical amounts of support or you'll just be considered terrorists at best. A poll a while ago showed more Americans want a party to the right of repiblicans than ones who want one to the left of democrats. There are less leftists in America than any other political group and we have to fight against the entire US medias narrative to build that critical support. I love the open hostility to the smallest political group in America for not being able to save the whole fucking country with violence.

load more comments (15 replies)
[–] timewarp@lemmy.world 28 points 11 hours ago (3 children)

Wow, finally a news outlet that calls it out like it is. Wait for CNN's take that blames black people, progressives, and Muslims.

[–] thoro@lemmy.ml 6 points 9 hours ago

Don't forget Hispanics!

[–] WanderingVentra@lemm.ee 3 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Cue that Onion video that just came out lol

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 3 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Please I need to see that. Got a link?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 2 points 4 hours ago

I mean blueMAGA has been doing it for them, but yeah not looking forward to that shitstorm.

[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 15 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Not for nothing but the American voter spoke pretty strongly maybe they want tougher immigration policies.

Also not for nothing but Joe Biden describes himself as a Zionist as well.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 3 points 4 hours ago (3 children)

But they got tougher immigration policies under Biden, he supported them and signed them into law.

He also put back the Obama Era criminal only ICE focus that resulted in more deportations than the Trump era.

Trump is weak on Immigration, he just ends up wasting border security money on indefinitely detaining women and children, and ineffective walls.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›