You rename socialism to "Goodism" and then the bourgeois press presents "Goodism" as evil, and then you rename it, and then--
Comradeship // Freechat
Talk about whatever, respecting the rules established by Lemmygrad. Failing to comply with the rules will grant you a few warnings, insisting on breaking them will grant you a beautiful shiny banwall.
A community for comrades to chat and talk about whatever doesn't fit other communities
So, (Sunday hot take!): why not stop using the word when advocating for "socialist ideas" or the "abandonment of capitalism" etc.?
"The Communists disdain to conceal their views and aims. They openly declare that their ends can be attained only by the forcible overthrow of all existing social conditions. Let the ruling classes tremble at a Communistic revolution. The proletarians have nothing to lose but their chains. They have a world to win."
The communists disdain to conceal their views and aims. They openly declare that their ends can be obtained only by forcible overthrow of all existing social conditions. Let the ruling classes tremble at a communist revolution. The proletarians have nothing to lose but their chains. They have a world to win. Working men of all countries, unite!
Why should we let the class enemy dictate what language we can and cannot use?
if people find out that they've been tricked into supporting socialism, i get the feeling that it's going to backfire really hard.
also, you'll need to keep rebranding it every time it gets presented as evil by bougie media, as fiona said.
You Maniacs! You blew it up! Ah, damn you, it was SOCIALISM all along!!!!
Are you a filthy capitalism 2.0ist ?
I think when first talking to someone new about these ideas it's good to use somewhat sanitized language, just so that they're willing to engage and think about things for themselves, without having to worry about the anti-communist propaganda they've been subjected to.
However, past this very beginning stage, I see no reason to conceal. In fact, I think it's actively harmful. A socialist movement filled with followers with no access to writers of previous socialist thinkers, no analysis of real class antagonisms, and no understanding of the necessary solution (revolution), doesn't sound like a very effective movement.