this post was submitted on 18 Oct 2024
35 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19159 readers
5938 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 20 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Or we pass legislation forcing Hedge Funds to divest immediately, and fine them monthly if they don't comply. I'd vote for that.

[–] foggy@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Disallow any single entity from owning more than 1 residential property per county.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Then what are banks to do with their foreclosed inventory and probably a dozen other things I'm not thinking of? There's a line, but 1 ain't it.

[–] Riven@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I was thinking 4 max per single owner and give banks exceptions for foreclosures.

I don't begrudge people their vacation house in addition to their regular house and I also understand that people's parents might pass away and leave you their houses.

Either 4 max or 2 max and give an exception while you have the extra inheritance houses on the market.

Either way once you reach more than 2 they should be HEAVILY taxed, enough where most of the rent you earn should go toward the taxes and make it unviable to own and rent unless you're filthy rich and can afford the insane taxes on it.

[–] karl_chungus@lemm.ee 4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Yeah, we’re never going to find an arbitrary amount that satisfies everyone.

Access to housing, like education, healthcare and water should just be considered essential and not allowed to be run for profit or owned by a corporation, hedge fund or any entity beyond a person.

But thanks to Citizens United, they are people!

[–] eldavi@lemmy.ml 8 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

tldr: rents will go down once landlords are unable to find willing renters for a long enough period of time that the petite landlords will start to need the rent money and begin accepting smaller rents; which their algorithms say is in 2026.

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 2 weeks ago

Is it greed? Yeah.

[–] Misspelledusernme@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

National rent control

[–] GeneralDingus@lemmy.cafe 1 points 2 weeks ago

Inflation will start to increase as well as the federal reserve cuts rates. Housing will become more expensive as a result and rent will follow shortly after.