this post was submitted on 17 Oct 2024
224 points (97.1% liked)

Privacy

31798 readers
247 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

We’ve been anticipating it for years,1 and it’s finally happening. Google is finally killing uBlock Origin – with a note on their web store stating that the ...

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ASDraptor@lemmy.autism.place 34 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I love how they gave a TL;DR right at the beginning of the article, it made me stay and read the rest out of respect for the author.

Google lives of the ads (among the things), of course a browser they develop is going to screw the add-ons that block ads. Solution: avoid google if you want an ad-free internet.

Edit: typo

[–] tenchiken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 25 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

What pisses me off is seeing more and more "You need to upgrade your browser for this site!" when using Firefox.

Having to use a spoof header gets frustrating frequently too.

[–] DarkDarkHouse@lemmy.sdf.org 15 points 2 weeks ago

In my head I respond “you need to upgrade your website to handle my rad browser, fellas”

[–] Fleppensteijn@feddit.nl 9 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I haven't seen such warnings for years anymore

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] darkstar@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 weeks ago

I haven't seen this warning in 6 years

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 18 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

you guys notice this strategy lately of announcing something bad, and dragging it on to soften the outrage?

tech companies seem to be doing it a lot. microsoft with windows recall too.

[–] Blemgo@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

It has always been a common strategy. Aim for the extremes, and then move to your actual goal to seem reasonable and make the opposition think they won.

[–] FriendBesto@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This has been done for decades. It is PR 101, and it is done to indoctrinate and subsequently normalize XYZ onto the average consumer/citizen.

In Marketing, you get taught that the average person has a memory of 3 to 6 months for issues like this, at the most. So, if you can afford to stretch something for longer, than acceptance on average, will always go up. Attention span are short. In other cases, it alleviates any cases of legal liability. Since no one can say they were not warned.

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

thanks for the answer. it really helps to understand whats happening when I notice this stuff. id like to be better at it, where can i start in an approachable way?

also how do we even defend from it?

[–] xia@lemmy.sdf.org 17 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

uBlock may have enough support to start their own maintained fork, and be the upstream for all the other quiet browsers. That dude is like THE ONE GUY that makes chromium sane, and doesn't even take donations?!

[–] darkstar@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 weeks ago

That's madness, I was literally about to donate to him today but I check the site you're absolutely correct. No donations :(

[–] Ilandar@aussie.zone 16 points 2 weeks ago (13 children)

This article has some misinformation in places. Like it claims Vivaldi's ad-blocker cannot be investigated further because the project is closed source, but the only closed source part of Vivaldi is the UI (approximately 5% of the total code). The ad-blocker C++ code is published along with the other 95% of the browser's code.

[–] wellheh@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I was actually under the impression the whole browser was closed. Thanks for the clarification

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
[–] DoubleChad@lemmy.ml 15 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (3 children)

My dad used to watch TV and I always wondered why given how shit it was, nothing but ads. He told me about how great it used to be when he was a kid. I can't help think the same thing is happening now with the internet. It's dying. It's already shit compared to 10 years ago and I only see it getting worse. Our generations will cling to it remembering what it used to be though, just like he did.

[–] OhVenus_Baby@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 weeks ago

We will have services to scrape the internet to cleanup the garbage.

[–] hessenjunge@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 2 weeks ago

The difference between linear tv (that your dad watched) and the internet is that there is no alternative to the latter.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] tekato@lemmy.world 11 points 2 weeks ago (12 children)

In an ideal world the headline would be “Google kills Chrome by preventing users from blocking ads”.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] Aermis@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I finally switched to Firefox when I couldn't remove the ads on my casual browsing. Now I'm told Firefox isn't cash money either? Wtf is going on here.

[–] Mojeek@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 weeks ago

forks of firefox still keeping things going such as mullvad browser, waterfox, librewolf

[–] Mango@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago
load more comments
view more: next ›