this post was submitted on 02 Oct 2024
50 points (98.1% liked)

No Stupid Questions

35409 readers
913 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I'm looking for 3rd parties who watch and report on developments in these large "world-shaping" corporations. Like a watchdog or a canary when they get into lawsuits or get caught doing bad things. Investigative reporting whether IRL or thorough internet documentarian style is ideal.

I've been thinking a lot about how google's algorithm changes have contributed to the web becoming the shit show it is now and what the alternatives could be. I do want to make sure I have a clear understanding of as much of the history as I can.

I tried searching "who watches google" and obviously just got advertised pages of Android Wear spy bracelets.

Is there a good old-fashioned directory page (or Community) for these anti-Web 2.0 resources?

Your help is appreciated!

top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

https://themarkup.org/ maybe? At least that is what they claim to be doing.

[–] Venator@lemmy.nz 13 points 18 hours ago (2 children)
[–] jaybone@lemmy.world 3 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

Wouldn’t Mozilla have a conflict of interest?

[–] SolOrion@sh.itjust.works 4 points 16 hours ago

Yes, but that would just make them a biased source. Not an entirely useless one.

[–] Venator@lemmy.nz 1 points 16 hours ago

They mostly just provide a good summary of various companies privacy policies, for whatever that's worth 😅

[–] njordomir@lemmy.world 3 points 17 hours ago

I'm surprised I didn't think of the EFF despite donating to them before. Thank you for the links.

[–] njordomir@lemmy.world 1 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

This looks really interesting. I try to get stories from varied sources, but don't particularly want it "curated" for me. I'm going to add this to my rotation.

[–] schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 17 hours ago

They have a Mastodon account, which is why I know about them, you might want to follow that.

[–] leaky_shower_thought@feddit.nl 1 points 14 hours ago

sorry, i also didn't get anything close.

best i can do is bbb.

eff, as has been suggested, is also doing great things, but they're not specifically the watchdog.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 11 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

I tried searching “who watches google” and obviously just got advertised pages of Android Wear spy bracelets.

have you tried this on platforms other than google?

Also, to answer the question... the cops/regulatory agencies (FTC, FCC, SEC, FBI/DOJ for examples. Sometimes congress hauls them before the senate or house of reps...)

[–] njordomir@lemmy.world 3 points 17 hours ago

Yes, I tried Duckduckgo, but also didn't get great results. Admittedly, I could have revised my terms a few more times, but I've had good luck with things Lemmy recommends, and this doesn't really seem like a niche interest on this site.

Thanks for the recommendation on all the 3 letter agencies. I bet there are mountains of CSPAN coverage out there for me to watch.

[–] jherazob@fedia.io 10 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

I suggest you subscribe to Cory Doctorow's and Ed Zitron's mailing lists, those are two people that regularly write about those people and what are they up to

[–] TerkErJerbs@lemm.ee 1 points 5 hours ago

Ed's got a podcast called Better Offline as well.

[–] Huckledebuck@sh.itjust.works 5 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

This is what came up for "who watches Google"

"who keeps an eye on Google"

"who makes sure Google isn't doing bad things"

Still no answer.

[–] njordomir@lemmy.world 3 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

You got closer than I did. I didn't mention it in the original post, but I also tried duckduckgo with little luck. I hope to god this is peak enshittification because I can imagine how it gets worse from here.

[–] Kelly@lemmy.world 3 points 16 hours ago

I'm getting interesting results with this:

https://www.google.com/search?q=tech+industry+watchdog

I think naming a particular tech vendor is likely to get different results compared to using generic terms.