this post was submitted on 28 Sep 2024
58 points (96.8% liked)

politics

19097 readers
3461 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 23 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Ok, but let's not pretend that people didn't vote for the guy. He should be prosecuted for his crimes, but he won the primary and he won the election. If we don't like how elections work, we should change that, but acting like he doesn't represent the will of the people because he took shady money is a retcon. The primary was a RCV that ran through 8 instant runoffs, resulting in every single ballot preference counting, and Eric Adams won by 8,000 votes. If you take his money away, maybe Kathryn Garcia, another moderate centrist, would have won instead.

[–] EleventhHour@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

The only reason he ended up the Democratic nominee is because New York City voters did not understand ranked choice voting during the primary. It was the first year it was instituted, and there was absolutely no public education campaign to teach people what the hell it was or how it worked.

Kathryn Garcia should’ve been the nominee, and nearly was. Had she been, she would have won easily. and considering the campaign finance violations, Eric Adams committed, it’s no wonder he had an advantage.

She was my number one vote. I was so so angry when she didn’t win the primary. And I really had to hold my nose to vote for Eric Adams. Everyone knew he was a piece of shit at the top of the election, but he was a lot better than Curtis Silwa.

Edit: Michelle Gomez -> Kathryn Garcia — sorry for that half-awake mistake!

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I don't see a Michelle Gomez on the 2021 ballots. Do you mean Kathryn Garcia, or Dianne Morales?

[–] EleventhHour@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Oh, shit— this is what I get for commenting when I’m half-awake— you are correct! Thanks so much for the fact check! I’ve edited my previous comment. (Oops!)

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

No worries. I googled her and thought Missy was going to run for NYC mayor, which would be on brand, but surprising.

[–] EleventhHour@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It was several years ago, and I’m still really pissed about it

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

I don't blame you

[–] lennybird@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

New York Dems... From Bloomberg to Cuomo to Hochul and Donald Trump himself... They're definitely... Special. (I should include Menendez in that, too).

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Until we get money out of Dem primaries; people willing to do shady shit will keep winning Dem primaries

Why stop w/ Dems?

Overturn Citizens United (2010) and stop all shady money in all primaries

[–] MediaBiasFactChecker@lemmy.world -4 points 1 month ago

Jacobin - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for Jacobin:

MBFC: Left - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://jacobin.com/2024/09/eric-adams-nyc-corruption-election
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support