this post was submitted on 26 Sep 2024
630 points (97.3% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

26299 readers
5870 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 33 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

Science fiction is based in reality and usually just extrapolates what we know is scientifically possible, just not with current technology. They can usually explain how stuff works because it's based on real science to some degree.

Star Trek is science fiction.

Fantasy really just follows the rule of cool. If it's cool, throw it in. It's based on nothing but what the writer thinks is cool as shit.

Star Wars is future fantasy.

[–] prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works 20 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Absolutely 100% wrong.

Star Wars is ancient fantasy, it happened A LONG TIME AGO in a galaxy Far far away

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] pHr34kY@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The best rule: It's fantasy if there is a sword.

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 12 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 day ago

Tachyon beams: sci fi
Batleth fights: fantasy

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] saigot@lemmy.ca 26 points 2 days ago

If it's not from the fantasy region of middle earth then it's just sparkling fiction.

[–] Sotuanduso@lemm.ee 10 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I've been reading stories from the Hatsune Miku rhythm game app, that almost straddles the line between urban fantasy and unexplained sci-fi. The premise is that instances of the vocaloids live in personalized virtual worlds for different (small) groups of humans. The humans can teleport to these worlds by playing a special song on their phone, or the vocaloids can project themselves as holograms from the humans' phones. It's almost sci-fi because it mostly works within constraints of technology. For example, you get booted out of the virtual world if your phone runs out of battery, and if your phone gets shorted out, it can prevent the vocaloids from projecting themselves until the phone is repaired (though if the phone still works otherwise, they can voice chat.) Also the special song can be transferred to different machines and still works. But then what makes it more fantasy is that the song and worlds are created from the humans' feelings (and if they lose the song, a new copy will appear for them,) and it works without internet connection (if one member of a group is stranded and another isn't, they could have a vocaloid relay a message.) And then just recently I read a chapter where some characters were able to access their virtual world through their dreams, without needing the song file in the first place. For me, that's what completely tipped the scale into urban fantasy.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] rem26_art@fedia.io 3 points 1 day ago

just like IRL trees and computer science trees!

[–] frezik@midwest.social -2 points 1 day ago

Fantasy evolved out of folk tales in the public domain. It was owned by nobody, and everyone could add to the story. It'd be accepted if people thought the story was good enough. Later, new stories were under copyright, but their heritage was clearly public.

SF grew up when a strong copyright regime was already in place. It was owned by either a single person or a corporation, and only they had the legal right to declare what was canon or not.

[–] ryathal@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 day ago

Science fiction is used to look down upon society and is often pessimistic. Fantasy look ls up at what could be and is generally optimistic.

[–] FardyCakes@lemmy.world 92 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (8 children)

Am I the only one that is seeing this as a joke referencing Stalactites and Stalagmites? Like I also think that it fits as a good thought experiment, but is the joke so obvious that no one is stating it? Or is am I just reading something into it that's not there?

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 41 points 2 days ago

I’ve only read your comment so far, but I thought it was obvious enough to be surprised your comment was in top

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago

You seem to be one of the few commenting so far.

[–] d00phy@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I used to get them confused until a visit to Luray Cavern. The tour guide explained that one “held ‘tite’ to the ceiling while the other just ‘mite’ reach it.”

[–] wieson@feddit.org 5 points 1 day ago

They look like:

T

M

[–] DocMcStuffin@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's easier than that: c for ceiling, g for ground.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DharkStare@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

The joke is so obvious there's no need to comment on it so others, including myself, are using this as an opportunity to post our opinions on the difference between sci-fi and fantasy.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] AFKBRBChocolate@lemmy.world 37 points 2 days ago (3 children)

I always liked the distinction (I forget who originated it) that science fiction is a story set in a world where the rules are defined by physics and fantasy is a story set in a world where the rules are defined by the author.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 18 points 2 days ago (2 children)
[–] Skua@kbin.earth 46 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Star Wars is absolutely fantasy that happens to be set in space

[–] blaue_Fledermaus@mstdn.io 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Dune is more fantasy than Star Wars and many consider it one of the best sci-fi of all times.

[–] Skua@kbin.earth 9 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I personally subscribe to Asimov's definition of sci fi:

Science fiction can be defined as that branch of literature which deals with the reaction of human beings to changes in science and technology.

While Dune is full of stuff that's just straight up magic, the story is very much about how humans handle the technology, even when the in-universe basis of the technology is essentially magic. Long before the story ever started, we invented AI, freaked out about it, and then had to figure out how to replace computers in an interstellar society. The main overarching plot of the kwisatz haderach is about the consequences of the "invention" of precognition, even if the means of the invention are very fantastical. Several major factions are basically "what if we did super advanced selective breeding on humans for a thousand years".

Star Wars, meanwhile, isn't concerned with that sort of thing. It's an adventure of good againt evil in the most classic of ways. It's sword and sorcery. Even when a literal world-destroying superweapon is a major plot point, it doesn't actually take much of any time to think about what this technology would do to society beyond "be very scary". The obvious point of comparison is nuclear weapons in real life, and the development of those re-shaped culture enormously. We suddenly had this craze of imagination of all the things nuclear power might do. Humanity conquered the atom and we couldn't stop dreaming up new ways to wield this power. Most of which were fucking insane. In Star Wars, a power orders of magnitude greater shapes society no more than a particularly big army.

Star Wars is only interested in the characters, whatever technology is present is set dressing to allow for fun visuals. That's not something I say as a negative either. It's perfectly valid and reasonable for a story to take more interest in its characters than its setting.

Disclaimer: I'm writing all this thinking only about the nine main series films. Especialy the original three. I'm sure someone has written Asimov-definition sci fi somewhere in the Star Wars canon, "legends" or not. I've just never delved into it much at all.

[–] TheBat@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

Star Wars, meanwhile, isn't concerned with that sort of thing. It's an adventure of good againt evil in the most classic of ways. It's sword and sorcery.

Lightsaber and Forcery

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago (3 children)

I don't know if you're brave or foolish, but either way, vaya con dios. The Star Wars fans are relentless.

[–] roscoe@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I can only speak for myself, but as a Star Wars fan, I'm very aware it's fantasy. Shit man, it's got wizards.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Bahnd@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

The people who hate star wars the most are themselves the biggest fans of star wars.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Caboose12000@lemmy.world 27 points 1 day ago (1 children)

science fiction is in space and fantasy has castles.

I will take no further questions.

[–] blackbelt352@lemmy.world 21 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Counter point Star Wars. Magic powers, magic swords, rescuing princesses, chosen one prophesies.

[–] MIDItheKID@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago

Star Wars is 100% a Space Fantasy. A boy goes on an adventure accompanied by a wizard to save a princess and become a knight.

[–] fushuan@lemm.ee 7 points 1 day ago

as the other commenter said, there's very little science fiction in star wars. It's more fantastical creatures and magic and shit. it's actually fantasy. Star trek however, that's scify

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] hoshikarakitaridia@lemmy.world 22 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Why does this analogy make sense to me for some reason?

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 12 points 2 days ago (2 children)
[–] EvilFonzy@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

I believe I am currently on those drugs! To me, this means that sci-fi is usually written starting from the universe and then focuses down to the individual, but fantasy is written from the individual up to the world. Sci-fi has more of a universe building focus and fantasy has more of a personal and character development focus.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

Can I have some of those drugs please?

[–] magnetosphere@fedia.io 3 points 1 day ago

I can’t tell if she’s making an analogy, or merely making a joke about remembering the difference between two similar things. Stalactites form on the ceiling of a cave, while stalag_mites_ form on the floor.

[–] MossyFeathers@pawb.social 26 points 2 days ago

Fantasy is almost alway low-tech, Sci-fi is almost always high-tech. As such, fantasy tech levels could be compared to starting low and going high, while sci-fi starts high and then goes low as it tries to explain the concepts it's introducing.

[–] DarkCloud@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Because in the classical Jungian style of analysis, imagery of the basement of a childhood home was a revisiting of the past.

Likewise "up from the floor" indicates ancients coming up from caves, ancient monsters to be slain, underground dungeons. The primitive unchained and revisited.

...and using Freud's principle of the inversion; down from the ceiling is indicative of from the future.

Prometheanism, featuring stories of Science only taking us so far before we fall from the ceiling, or rather it chaotically falls on us.

The idea that a return to primative barbarism and violence can also come from above, from technology, from the future unknown, from advanced beings, complex plans, or outter space.

So whether it's up from the floor (ancient past) or down from the ceiling (unknown future) - it's coming for us, with risks and dangers we're not ready for...

...or so the stories go.

[–] iltoroargento@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I, too, love stories of otter space.

[–] hoshikarakitaridia@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] DharkStare@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I would argue that science fiction and fantasy are the same thing and the only difference is the explanation for how all the cool stuff works.

Functionally, there's no real difference between a portal that takes the characters to another world using a wormhole and one that does it through through magic. Just like how there's no difference between Vulcans/Klingons/Wookies and Elves/Dwarves/Beastmen. Both are intelligent non-humans.

[–] BorgDrone@lemmy.one 8 points 1 day ago

There are disappointingly few epic space battles in fantasy though.

[–] SzethFriendOfNimi@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Enders Game instilled the importance of adjusting your frame of reference. What was up can become down.

So it’s science fiction but when you consider a collaborative global human response to existential danger it’s fantasy.

But the Shadow series shows how quickly we go back to weaponizing and using gifted war trained children as tools of conquest… so realism/horror?

[–] jballs@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago

Orson Scott Card actually weighed in on a simple way to determine if something is fantasy or sci-fi since he writes both:

The difference between science fiction and fantasy…is simply this, science fiction has rivets, fantasy has trees.

[–] Isa@feddit.org 7 points 2 days ago (2 children)

And the one, floating in through the open window … how was that called again?

[–] capt_wolf@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago (2 children)

But what if there's bats? Bats typically aren't on the floor!

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 15 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Bats on the floor are obviously Rats, because the bottom of the B is obscured by the puddle they're standing on.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] zloubida@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

Fantasy is right-leaning while SF is left-leaning. Easy peasy.

load more comments
view more: next ›