this post was submitted on 12 Jul 2023
43 points (97.8% liked)

Games

16410 readers
1257 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works
43
The FTC is reportedly leaning towards appealing its Microsoft - Activision loss | VGC (www.videogameschronicle.com)
submitted 1 year ago by nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works to c/games@sh.itjust.works
11 comments fedilink hide all child comments
top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] firewuf@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I'm glad their appealing. I mean the judge's son literally works for Microsoft. Talk about fair and impartial.

-https://open.substack.com/pub/mattstoller/p/will-the-biggest-tech-merger-of-all?utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web -https://open.substack.com/pub/mattstoller/p/judge-rules-for-microsoft-mergers?utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web

[–] enigmatic_cloud@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago

Yet another example of a disturbing pattern in judges with conflicts of interest not recusing themselves.

[–] warmaster@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

LOL, what a fucking joke.

[–] qwamqwamqwam@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Y’all don’t want to hear this but the appeal is going nowhere. Antitrust in the US requires consolidation to harm consumer choice, and with the agreements Microsoft has committed to that’s not provable. The EU has much stricter rules about this stuff than the US and even they cleared the acquisition. This has more to do with the administration’s tech-regulation initiative needing to show some proof-of-life than anything with a chance of actually preventing a merger. Feel free to downvote me to oblivion if it makes you feel better.

[–] ArtificialLink@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Its honestly crazy that our government doesn't see this as anti competitive.

[–] ech@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

One judge doesn't. Also, the FTC is part of the government.

[–] ArtificialLink@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yet this shit is still pushing through and they have to appeal. And we all know whats gonna happen. Whens the last time a monopoly got broken up or stopped? Like the 50's? Maybe. Like the last time we broke up a corporation their reach was like a fifth of what corporations reach is today. But our government still thought they were too powerful. So wtf changed? Oh right everybody dirty now.

[–] ApexHunter@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

Microsoft is nowhere close to a monopoly player in the gaming market (before or after this).

[–] enigmatic_cloud@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago

Please fucking do… Companies simply cannot continue to get free passes to do as they please, consolidating the market until no future competition is ever possible.

load more comments
view more: next ›