Can we can smart cars entirely? Every addition in the past five years has been awful
this post was submitted on 23 Sep 2024
125 points (99.2% liked)
News
23293 readers
3382 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Just wait for subscriptions to become the new normal. GPS for $4, smart services for another $10. They’re basically going down the mobile games standards for enshittification.
My dad got a car in 2011. It has gps. He has to pay a premium to update that, and roads get changed surprisingly often. This is by no means new!
Hell, OnStar has been a thing since 1996. My dad's 2005 Buick had it.
I had a car from 2012, Ford. Built in GPS. Cost of upgrading? About $200 in Denmark.
Incidentally my car is also from 2011. It has no GPS, so much cheaper for me to use navigation. Less integrated though. Which is of course why they can charge so much for new maps.
Wow my car generates crypto for Ford while I drive that's just great I really feel the benefit also it tells me that climate change isn't real so I don't even feel bad for driving everywhere
No no they're just starting to put ✨AI✨ in them!
Don't forget ads in the screens!
I think that you could do all sorts of wonderful things with a car computer.
I just don't like a number of things that auto manufacturers have actually been doing with them.
And I'd like the car computer to be replaceable and upgradeable and preferably have the life-critical hardware separate from the non-life-critical hardware.
Agreed. I want a thermal camera that detects deer. Instead I get seat warmer subscriptions
This is just the Tiktok ban all over again. The problem is not the Chinese apps/cars spying on you, it's ALL the apps/cars spying on you. If it's creepy to have a foreign power with that much access to our data, then it's creepy for a company to have it too.
Maybe by banning it they'll create a market demand for cars that don't spy on you
Russian? Are there really that many people trying to import Ladas?
My guess is that Russia just got stuffed in there due to the whole invading Ukraine thing getting them generally attached to China on "bad guys" lists, but the thing doesn't just restrict vehicles where final assembly was done in Russia, but also where components or software came from Russia. And that is probably a more-realistic concern.
In past years:
-
One incident had the German navy, including their submarines, using navigation software out of Russia.
https://ukdefencejournal.org.uk/german-sub-navigation-system-russian-controlled/
German media has reported that the Russian controlled ‘Navi-Sailor 4100’ has been installed on at least 100 vessels operated by Germany’s military, including the submarine fleet
I looked at that. Navi-Sailor also links directly to radar (so touches external radios directly), provides remote management and diagnostic and security services. It also deals with military map formats that can store classified information. And, obviously, it's driving ships. I don't know precisely how it was installed in Germany's case, and maybe it was very carefully set up such that that isn't a concern, but at least for me, that'd be something that I'd be extremely cautious about.
-
Another had British submarine work being done using software subcontracted out to companies in Belarus and Russia.
https://kyivindependent.com/telegraph-uk-nuclear-submarine-it-system-belarus/
The Telegraph first reported on Aug. 2 that part of the IT software used by British nuclear submarine engineers had been outsourced to Belarusian developers, one of whom was working from Russia.
The software was supposed to have been developed solely by U.K.-based IT workers with security clearance. The incident took place before Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine.
And those were both dealing with military hardware, where you'd think that the manufacturers would be a lot more careful than with civilian stuff.
I think that stuff like that has maybe started governments taking a closer look at what supply chains look like and what might be vulnerable.
That's fair. I wasn't really thinking about how many times you can add "sub" in front of "contractor". Though it seems like the defense industry should really have a better handle on who's building their stuff.
Not just Ladas, SMART Ladas. I didn't even know they made smart Ladas.
Yeah, I don't need hezbollahed from my giant battery toting me around.
And they could just regulate the tech itself, keep everyone safe, but no, they only block the Bad Countries. Because it's about money. Nobody calling the shots cares about safety here.
Defcon literally every god damn year: "Here's how to hack and remotely control a car, which we did it by hijacking the stupid cloud based data collecting service installed on the hardware. Now we can just send whole ass CAN frames and make it do whatever we want"
Feds at defcon: "Yeah but did China make it? Cuz if China made it, only then is it a problem"
They're punishing russia and china for the zionist terror attack?
Smart move, politicians. \s