These idiots...
The ballots in 2020 WERE HAND COUNTED THREE TIMES.
No major deviations or fraud were found. What in the heck are these fuckers up to here...
this post was submitted on 20 Sep 2024
95 points (98.0% liked)
politics
19104 readers
4631 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Causing delays. It will be quick to count the ballots in rural, likely repubs, areas. It will take much longer in urban areas that are likely voting democratic. Eventually they will get a judge to rule that counting has to stop and that the current count will stand, too bad they only counted the rural areas completely.
Yeah that’s pretty much the plan, I think. But also, remember the MAGA dipshits have gotten a hold of a ton of election-related positions in GA, and I’m sure they’ll be fucking with the ballots in other ways too.
And when anyone (correctly this time) calls out election fraud, they're going to act like they were vindicated for their 2020 lies.
They will claim voter fraud, even though there is next to none. They will be perpetrating electoral fraud (as they did in 16 and 20).
Edit: 2000 too, as was mentioned
And 2000
Good point, how soon after vote counts is Trump's retrial?
Trying to increase the chance of confusion and questioning of election accuracy by introducing a process that has a high likelihood of being slightly off in a way that doesn't impact the results, but does give ammunition to people that claim the election results aren't reliable.
If a machine count is perfect, the human count is off by a few votes, and the candidates are tens of thousands of votes apart the vote count was fair and reliable. Republicans want to paint this as the opposite, by focusing on 100% perfection in the largest totals.
Changing this at the last minute also increases the chances of mistakes, because there isn't enough time for training the thousands needed to do all the hand counts within the reqhired time frames.
give ammunition to people that claim the election results aren't reliable.
And then they'll say "Oh well, guess we'll just have to have our state legislature decide who won."
This is all a consequence of the Roberts court gutting the voting rights act.
And if they don't like the results they will ask for a recount
That is why they are insisting on hand counting. Because machine counting would be accurate.
I hope they still plan on machine counting to act as a fail-safe.
You seem to assume their goal is an accurate count...
That's what makes this exceptionally stupid: ballots in Georgia are fully electronic.
You make your selections on a touchscreen voting machine. The machine records your selections. "Counting" is literally a matter of taking the output from the machine and telling a server to add up the totals.
The paper ballot is literally just a laser printer next to the machine that spits out a sheet of paper showing what the voter selected. The paper ballots are supposed to just be a backup in case there are problems with the machines.
Here’s to hoping for such a big win for Harris that the Georgia EV’s are inconsequential.
This. We need to turn out in such numbers that they'll have to be blatantly fucking transparent and have to expand their bullshit into purple and blue states .
reminder if there is no clear winner then congress votes on who should be president with each state getting one vote. every state counts.
Next step: insert partisan hacks in ballot hand counting process
That was step 1. This is like step 12
One of those [Trump-aligned] members, Janelle King, suggested that accuracy was more important than timing.
...
“As a voter, I would rather wait another hour...
An hour‽ We're talking between thousands and hundreds of thousands of ballots. You absolute troglodyte, you think humans will do a better job than machines?
...to ensure that the that the [sic] count is accurate...
If only we had historical data points to see if humans do a better or worse job at counting accurately...
...than to get a count or get a number within that hour, and then to find out at the close of an election, after certifications” already taken place “that we have people suing because the count was not accurate.”
Which will happen anyway, because y'all can't seem to accept the reality that most of us don't like your demigod.
An hour‽ We're talking between thousands and hundreds of thousands of ballots. You absolute troglodyte, you think humans will do a better job than machines?
No. In fact she's counting on the opposite because she's manufacturing an excuse to throw out Atlanta's votes.
The Hill - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)
Information for The Hill:
MBFC: Least Biased - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: Mostly Factual - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source
Media Bias Fact Check | bot supportSearch topics on Ground.News
https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/4890883-georgia-election-board-ballot-hand-count/