this post was submitted on 11 Jul 2023
332 points (93.5% liked)

Showerthoughts

29819 readers
947 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. A showerthought should offer a unique perspective on an ordinary part of life.

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. Avoid politics
    • 3.1) NEW RULE as of 5 Nov 2024, trying it out
    • 3.2) Political posts often end up being circle jerks (not offering unique perspective) or enflaming (too much work for mods).
    • 3.3) Try c/politicaldiscussion, volunteer as a mod here, or start your own community.
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I seriously couldn't live without cargo pants. At any given time, I'll have at least 4 pockets filled with random stuff. But no pockets? How do you even survive?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Lemmylefty@lemmy.world 52 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I know a lot of seamstresses, from quilters to knitters to stitchers.

Without fail, if they make their own clothes, they add pockets.

It is a truth universally acknowledged, that a woman in possession of clothes, must be in want of pockets.

[–] CaspianXI@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Why haven't clothing manufacturers figured this out yet?

[–] Lemmylefty@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Double dipping with purses, executives often being men, and clothes looking svelter without pockets.

[–] livus@kbin.social 13 points 1 year ago

Also at scale it's probably cheaper to make clothes without pockets because less fabric.

[–] Greenskye@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

Same kinda logic as people who complain about ads saying that they'd rather pay for the service, instead of ads. The reality is only about 1% ever do pay. I assume it's similar for clothing, where most people naturally gravitate towards the clothes that look 'best', even if they don't have pockets.

[–] oatscoop@midwest.social 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Reading these comments, I'm starting the think I've been doing the whole "dating profile" thing wrong. Clearly I need to mention I have some experience making and altering clothes, which includes enlarging or adding pockets to anything.

Everything else on there fluff compared to the ability to give a woman functional pockets.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] TeaHands@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Just made myself a new skirt, even the sewing pattern came without pockets. I put massive ones in anyway.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] proudblond@lemmy.world 33 points 1 year ago (3 children)
[–] Granite@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago

Honestly, I just started buying men’s skinny jeans. For the pockets.

[–] ElectroVagrant@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

More and more I've been seeing backpacks (small & some regular sized) or occasionally sling bags (single strap backpacks with less storage that sling across back). Honestly those make more sense, even if they're not as "fashionable".

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] sock@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

i would forget the bag everywhere i cant remember shit like that. i bump my pockets to make sure everything is there every 30 seconds. i feel like I'm gonna lose something at all times without a zipper pocket

[–] Fester@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago

I think that pocket-bumping energy would be diverted to purse-clutching.

[–] mvirts@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But you know when you finally have to wash your pants because the spaghetti sauce is getting noticable from afar and you go to pull all the stuff out and it takes up your whole desk then you put on some other pants and only put half the stuff back in because you didn't need half that crap anyways? What we all need is detachable pockets. Make a bag, slap some Velcro on the back, maybe a shoulder strap, a zipper, a pattern with some letters signaling the pedigree of the item. It would be revolutionary! You could make big ones with straps for your back, small ones for your waist with a classic pastel swoosh, idk. For real though those modular cargo pants that turn into shorts, I would most definitely buy three pairs of those with zip off pockets just so I don't have to do the stuff shuffle all the time. Plus you could actually make specialized pockets. Insulated food pocket, anti static electronics pocket, mesh pocket for ... Idk the beach or something? Vacuum sealed pocket, hamster pocket, tater tots pocket... The possibilities are endlesS :P

[–] ProfezzorDarke@feddit.de 12 points 1 year ago (4 children)

They're called belt pouches and were the shit in medieval times. They came in all shapes and sizes, some very specific designs, some more general, for all kinds of ourposes. There were even belt-books and coin purses. I mean, the T-shirt brought back the tunic, so why not let's all switch back to long but airy robes and a belt with two pouches?

[–] ProfezzorDarke@feddit.de 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Adding to this, for a very long time in history, women's pockets were a seperate garment and all long skirts and dresses would simply have slits so you could access them, you basically wore two bags left and right on a seperate belt under your clothes.

[–] charlytune@mander.xyz 4 points 1 year ago (4 children)

This is actually what I want for travelling!

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] m88youngling@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

I believe that the most heroic thing about Kim Possible is that she wears cargo pants.

[–] 0xeb@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They surviva with a bag that is worth at least 92 pockets

[–] netvor@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (3 children)

🤔

But pockets at seem to force me to have some sort of system.

I feel that if I had to wear a bag it would be a holy mess.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] pfannkuchen@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

Women can wear pants with pockets and not be typecast as lesbian, men can't wear dresses and not be typecast as gay or trans, unless they're muscular bros on a stag do.

[–] lasagna@programming.dev 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Nioxic@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

Not actually a showerthought.. but ill allow it

End this gender oppression, give the women pockets!

Cargo pants = man purse…

[–] JesusChrist@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Why do you need so many pockets? All you need are keys, phone, and wallet. Jeans look better than cargo pants.

[–] JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And headphones, and maybe a knife? And why not some duct tape just in case anything breaks...

[–] hglman@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago (4 children)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Gatsby@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Keys, wallet, phone, multitool, pistol, sunglasses, in ear hearing protection with bluetooth, folding knife, lighter, sometimes gloves.

Lil different EDC where I'm literally surrounded by poisonous snakes and large wild cats+boar, and there isn't a hospital within an hour. But I can carry all that wearing jeans, if I count my shirt pocket and boots.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Knusper@feddit.de 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I always get anxious when girls have to put their phones into their back pocket.
I feel, if I did that, I would immediately throw myself onto the next chair and just hear a big ol' crack.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I was actually wondering the other day when my sister was bitching about her jeans not having real pockets why women who already wear jeans don't just buy men's jeans. Even skinny jeans for emo boys at Hot Topic have real pockets.

[–] girl@lemm.ee 18 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

Well, mens pants don’t fit most women. If the pants fit our waists, we can’t get them over our thighs/hips. If they fit our hips, they’re enormous on the waist. It’s already a bitch and a half to find women’s pants that fit, much less trying out men’s pants.

[–] badragonfly7137@lemmy.fmhy.ml 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yeah, the only time I made boys pants fit was when I was a late teen/young adult before I had kids. Now there's just no way it would ever work.

That said, all the new shorts and pants I buy have pockets. The shorts are basically women's versions of men's basketball shorts and the pants are yoga ones. Super comfy.

[–] Chickenstalker@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

May I suggest you start a new fashion trend: shoulder wallet "holsters" for women. Now you too can be practical while looking like a grizzled tv loose cannon police detective.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] reedthompson@reddthat.com 4 points 1 year ago

This. My husband is approximately the same height and weight I am; we have the same waist measurements and if I'm being honest he looks hella good in my pants.

However, I can barely get his jeans over my hips and they're too tight in the thighs. Not too mention the awkward kangaroo pouch crotch area.

We both wear men's goodfellow PJ bottoms from target (because POCKETS) and I wear a medium, he wears a small because he doesn't have hips.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] livus@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago

The cut is really different. Chances are if a woman can fit her hips into a pair of men's jeans, that will mean the waistband is several sizes too big.

[–] girl@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

lol I make sure to have a bag when I don’t have pockets. Or I make sure that I will be in a location that has quick access to anything I would’ve put in my pocket. Sure, I’ll always remember the envy I felt as I watched Jared from 9th grade pull a Ti-84 and several pencils out of his pocket (I had pockets but they only fit my fingers up to the second knuckle… women’s fashion). But the only thing I really need near me at all times is my phone. I’m almost always either at home or wok, where I have a million nearby locations to put my phone. If I’m out, I have my purse or backpack. It’s very convenient to pull some spare ibuprofen from my pocket, but wearing those cute pocket-less pants for a whole day is worth the 60 second trip to get the pills from wherever I left them.

[–] CaspianXI@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Wait, pocket-less pants are cuter? I'm suddenly tempted to start looking at girls' pants on the metro (except for the fact that will probably get me labeled as a perv...)

[–] girl@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago

I wasn’t generalizing, I was thinking of a very specific pair of my pants that are super awesome and have no pockets. They are a forest print with leopards and monkeys.

[–] Mohkia@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I don't carry much, wallet, phone in keys. I usually have a jacket or something that has pockets. I also try and pick out pants with the biggest pockets I can find. Which usually fits my wallet and keys and then I just carry my phone. I can't do purses, I'll just accidently leave them places. To risky.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] BisonLover@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I bought good old Levis online in the hopes of pockets, but even they have failed me; only enough room for a chapstick!

[–] Flaky_Fish69@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago (3 children)

https://www.511tactical.com/womens/womens-pants.html

511 pants were originally meant for mountaineering type stuff, but found their way into uniform supply for cops and security guards. you can probably find them (and similar) pants at uniform supply stores that cater to those types (as apposed to the nursing supply store. Whose pants are equally comfortable... just saying.)

they, uh, have pockets.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] 001100010010@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Why don't women just buy men's clothes to wear? I don't see any social stigma against it. Honestly I don't understand why clothes are still gendered. It's 2023, just wear whatever clothes is most useful to you.

[–] kersploosh@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Body shapes are very different. If you're a man go try on women's pants or coats and see how they fit.

[–] 001100010010@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Men are generally larger in size so it's harder to fit clothes designed for Women, who are smaller on average. Women on average are not as big as the average man, so shouldn't women be able to fit men's clothing?

Sorry if I'm being ignorant.

[–] angrystego@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Women are smaller, but they tend to have relatively bigger bottoms. The shape of men's pants just doesn't work.

[–] ProfezzorDarke@feddit.de 4 points 1 year ago

exactly. some women have extreme hip to waist ratio and straight cut jeans will just look baggy, odd, or just generally said: They won't fit at all.

[–] FollyDolly@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Mens pants have the crotch cut too low for me. So to step over something I have to do a wide legged cowboy walk and swing my leg over. Shit's weird.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Pixlbabble@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago
load more comments
view more: next ›