this post was submitted on 08 Sep 2024
107 points (86.4% liked)

politics

18870 readers
4775 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 43 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 70 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Interesting that 2/3rds think djt does not have the mental or cognitive health to be President and yet he polls near 50%. 16% of the people say yes, let's vote for the guy who doesn't have the brains to do the job.

I guess it's one of those "he hates what I hate" type situations

[–] antmzo220@lemmy.ml 19 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

Would you rather have an incompetent person you agree* with or a competent person you disagree with?

Edit: why in earth is this downvoted? I'm explaining their logic lol

Edit 2: *

[–] leisesprecher@feddit.org 14 points 1 week ago (2 children)

If you believe in their worldview, that actually makes sense. Biden had similar voter patterns not so long ago. If you truly believe that "your side" is the good one (irrespective of the objective reality), then voting for an idiot who will at least pull in some "good" people is perfectly reasonable.

I mean, we're talking about a group who unironically believe that Harris is a communist dictator in waiting.

[–] rednalsi@lemmings.world 2 points 1 week ago

and the evidence for that are AI generated images....

[–] hemmes@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

It's just crazy though because the modern Republican Party has become fascist. The very enemy that used to unite us all towards a better good against such evil.

[–] thefartographer@lemm.ee 10 points 1 week ago

Well shit, when you put it that way, I guess I'll just go eat some bullets?

[–] AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Did you mean to say “an incompetent person you agree with”?

[–] antmzo220@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 week ago

Ah, yes thank you.

[–] magnetosphere@fedia.io 60 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Tied. With a fascist, ranting scumbag. Sometimes I hate this country.

[–] fluxion@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This would be the blowout of the century if people used their brains before voting

[–] Fades@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

A significant amount of voters vote based on vibe instead of policy. Politics is just boring and they want to be entertained. Those are the "good" ones, as the rest of them don't vote at all.

Every single person in either of those two groups are so fucking pathetic and it hurts us all. They don't deserve to live in this country if they can't be bothered to do their duty as a citizen.

[–] FlowVoid@lemmy.world 47 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Pennsylvania (R+ 2.4), Michigan (R+1.2), Georgia (R+3.1), Wisconsin (R+1.1) and Nevada (R+2.2) remain in the margin of error or statistically tied, but with a Republican advantage, according to his Sept. 6 analysis.

This is quite misleading. Harris is slightly ahead in all of those states.

Silver explicitly cautioned readers not to misinterpret those numbers:

Let me emphasize again, because we’re now firmly in silly season of the campaign where bad-faith actors can dominate the discussion, that these figures reflect the lean of each state relative to the national numbers — and not the raw projections. For instance, our polling averages still have Harris slightly ahead in Wisconsin, but we show it as GOP-leaning relative to the rest of the country

[–] Makeitstop@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yeah, going off the polling averages in each state, Harris is currently leading in most of the swing states, with Georgia and North Carolina* being dead even.

image


* North Carolina is the only one that changes based on the inclusion or exclusion of third party candidates. Since third party candidates will be on the ballot, including Kennedy, I'm using that data instead of the slight lead for Trump that the head to head polls have.

[–] WaxedWookie@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Wait till you see the shenanigans the GOP pull in Georgia if it's swinging blue... It'll be shameless - I guarantee it.

[–] leadore@lemmy.world 37 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)
  1. Polls haven't been accurate for years and Silver takes and massages them to come up with his predictions. Always make sure you VOTE, no matter what any polls or pundits are saying.

  2. The Center Square is a conservative publication. Nate Silver currently works for Polymarket, an online betting company funded by Peter Thiel and crypto bros. So it's to both of their advantages to paint a picture that looks better for Trump. Remember, those who want to get trump in power need magats to believe that trump will surely win and that if he doesn't, it can only because the election was rigged by evil democrats. That way they give cover for corrupt red state election boards to refuse to certify their votes and red state legislatures to challenge results in the courts, force recounts and delays, certify and send invalid electors next January, and have a cohort of people ready and willing to fight or be violent if needed.

  3. Yes, the election is close, so make sure you VOTE no matter how optimistic or pessimistic you may feel about all this and no matter what state you live in, no matter whether it's a red, blue, or swing state. The margins need to be as large as possible in every state and the popular vote margin also as huge as possible so there is no question of the will of the people.

[–] rednalsi@lemmings.world 35 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (7 children)

why tied...? i know that Harris and the Democratic Party are not an ideal choice, but looking at your situation from Europe, i can not understand the popularity of Trump.

[–] Huckledebuck@sh.itjust.works 34 points 1 week ago

As an American, i can't understand it either. The only thing i can posit is that there are a lot of people that seem to enjoy being in their social media bubbles. It's a cult thing.

[–] Fades@lemmy.world 26 points 1 week ago

a mix of russian disinfo, right wing bigotry, desperate for power and control

[–] Krackalot@discuss.tchncs.de 19 points 1 week ago

Some people see his politics as a personal benefit, some filled with hate, some want a king. Basically, there are just a lot of shitbags in society.

[–] trajekolus@lemm.ee 14 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Looking at the European situation from outside is also baffling, with putinite parties on the rise by whipping up fears over migration. Similarities with the USA situation easy to find

[–] rednalsi@lemmings.world 4 points 1 week ago

yeah, sadly we only have a handful of somewhat "useful" politicians too

[–] Randelung@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Absolutely. And you can tell they try the US talking points, too. A while back a Swiss politician tweeted something about abortion and got zero traction, but it was very clear where that came from when it's never been a topic here. Sounds like a conspiracy, but if you put it in context with the recent FBI revelations it's not exactly far-fetched.

[–] Hacksaw@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 week ago

It's literally this from anywhere but America

[–] the_crotch@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Really? A European doesn't understand this? You guys invented charismatic populist psychopaths.

[–] Wogi@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Somebody's never heard of Xerxes. Europe, like all things invented in Europe, simply stole the idea from Asia and labeled it as European.

[–] rednalsi@lemmings.world 1 points 1 week ago

you should learn from our mistakes then

[–] SpruceBringsteen@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Rock Flag and Eagle

[–] Coelacanth@feddit.nu 30 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Trump rising in the polls is making my stomach churn. Having a bit of hope was nice while it lasted, I guess.

[–] kescusay@lemmy.world 23 points 1 week ago

Don't freak out. It's a single poll, and given trends, it looks like an outlier.

And remember that polling is still pretty fucked right now.

[–] Makeitstop@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

That's what push polls are for, to inflate the numbers for their own side while discouraging the opposing side.

And even those polls which aren't intended to skew the results are going to be shifted to meet the expectations of the pollster as they try to adjust the data to reflect what they think is a representative sample of likely voters.

[–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 4 points 1 week ago

Don't bother looking at polls. Go out and vote.

[–] Makeitstop@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago

I am extremely skeptical about this article's conclusions. It doesn't help that it starts out by bashing Harris and ignoring all the issues Trump has run into. Seriously, the news has been mostly pretty bad for Trump lately, there isn't a lot of reason to expect his numbers to be improving.

When looking across all polls and breaking them down by state, the general trend has been either chaotic swings from one poll to another, or a steady shift from Trump to Harris. Arizona is pretty much the only swing state that has shown a clear move towards Trump. Hell, even Texas and Florida are steadily shifting away from Trump. There's a reason why the Trump campaign has narrowed their focus and given up on several states they thought they could flip.

If anything, I would expect the main reasons for a shift to Trump would be Kennedy being removed from polls (even in states where he will still be on the ballot) and just a general tightening of the race as undecided voters choose either candidate.

[–] usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 week ago

Don't let one singular poll discourage you. Instead use it to motivate action. Singular polls bounce around with statistical noise. This is still a very winnable fight

Find how to register to vote for where you are

Find opportunities to volunteer around you

[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Reminder: the most effective strategy at this point in the race is to make plans for voting with other Democrats. Get all the demonrats you know to plan and let's Vote-Kill these rubes.

[–] TheHotze@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Doesn't even have to be Democrats, if you just convince a random group of people to vote, statistically more of them will vote for Harris

[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Didn't think of it that way, but thats because I work with all Rubes and have been repeating Trump's lines about not voting to them in an effort to get them not to vote.

[–] Fades@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

Get all the demonrats you know to plan

demoncrats

hmmm

[–] Fades@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

SO FUCKING GODDAMN PATHETIC

[–] BaldManGoomba@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Remember democrats need a bit of a lead since they are more likely to be disenfranchised or can't/won't vote. Young people especially college kids are hard to pin down since areas make it difficult for them to vote because home address

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (2 children)

The last time I did this, Arizona flipped to full Trump, Georgia was leaning to Harris, but still a toss up and she was still ahead in Michigan, but losing ground there.

Let's see what it looks like now:

AZ - WOW(!) 4 most recent polls are ALL ties(!)
https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/president-general/2024/arizona/

NV - Toss Up, Harris +1, Trump +1, 2 ties
https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/president-general/2024/nevada/

NM - Harris +7, +8, +11
https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/president-general/2024/new-mexico/

GA - Toss Up, Harris +1, Trump +1/+2, 2 ties
https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/president-general/2024/georgia/

NC - Trump +1, +2, tie
https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/president-general/2024/north-carolina/

PA - Trump +1, +2, 2 ties
https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/president-general/2024/pennsylvania/

MI - Harris +1, 2 ties
https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/president-general/2024/michigan/

WI - Toss Up Harris +1, Trump +2, Tied
https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/president-general/2024/wisconsin/

MN - Harris +5, +7, +11

So, Arizona is out of the Trump column and back to toss up.

GA, NC and PA moving away from Harris.

MI I'm tempted to call a toss up but no recent polling there gives Trump an advantage, so it's still slimly Harris as is NC and PA Trump.

WI moves from Harris to toss up and it seems likely MI will follow next week.

Plot that on the map and we get:

Trump needs 16. So GA by itself, or any two of WI, AZ, NV.

Harris needs 29. WI, AZ, NV is NOT enough. 27. So if Trump wins Georgia, she's done.

She needs Georgia + 2 other states to win. Georgia +1 is not enough. The most she could get that way is 27 with AZ.

[–] Makeitstop@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

A large portion of the shift towards Trump comes from two extremely unreliable sources Trafalgar Group, a republican funded polling agency, and Patriot Polling, which is only measuring registered voters not likely voters, and which doesn't provide any additional details like demographic data (despite adjusting the numbers to account for demographics).

And the Arizona polls you cite are all from the same source. It's actually kind of weird that they're the outlier with the tie, because they're sponsored by a pro-trump group.

[–] Fades@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

this country is fucked.

The Center Square - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for The Center Square:

MBFC: Right-Center - Credibility: Medium - Factual Reporting: Mostly Factual - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://www.thecentersquare.com/national/article_6de8ac8c-6dfd-11ef-9815-078b63d52cd4.html?a
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support