this post was submitted on 05 Sep 2024
114 points (99.1% liked)

News

23267 readers
1865 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Trump’s attorney John Lauro has confirmed that Trump is entering a plea of not guilty to the superseding indictment.

Federal prosecutors and lawyers for Donald Trump are in court today to discuss how to move forward with the federal election subversion case against Trump in the first hearing after the supreme court’s ruling granting him broad immunity from criminal charges.

top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Seraph@fedia.io 40 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It's going to be studied historically forever, how this scum pile is even an option for such a large portion of this country.

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 25 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Not if he wins, expect all "studies" that aren't right-wing propaganda to cease entirely.

[–] calabast@lemm.ee 11 points 2 months ago

If he wins, the only valid (legal) studies can be performed by watching a lot of YouTube videos. And the only way you are allowed to publish your study results is as a 2.5 hour YouTube video.

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 21 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Here's an interesting bit:

https://www.nytimes.com/live/2024/09/05/us/trump-election-interference-hearing/jack-smith-shows-flashes-of-emotion-as-trumps-election-case-returns-to-court?smid=url-share

Sitting in a row with other Justice Department officials behind the counsel table, he [Jack Smith] smiled broadly when John Lauro, a lawyer for former President Donald J. Trump, said offhandedly that he had yet to address his plan to file a motion challenging the legality of the special counsel.

Mr. Smith emphatically nodded his head in agreement several times after the presiding judge, Tanya S. Chutkan, interrupted Mr. Lauro when he suggested that the Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas had directed Mr. Trump’s lawyers to raise the issue. Judge Chutkan interrupted, and said, “He directed you to do that?”

Now, we may find that the lawyer was exaggerating a bit. But if it turns out that Thomas somehow reached out to the Trump legal team and said "Hey, I wrote this thing specifically to get you off the hook, use it", wouldnt that be a Big Fucking Deal?

[–] girlfreddy@lemmy.ca 13 points 2 months ago

NAL but I would think that would be a really, REALLY Big Fucking Deal.

Gawd, I'd love to be a fly on the wall in Chutkan's chambers when she calls Thomas' lawyer to verify who said what.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 17 points 2 months ago (1 children)

My reaction to this can be summed up in gif form by taking a clip out of context from the Home Alone movie Trump was not in, i.e. the good one:

[–] girlfreddy@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] Atelopus-zeteki@fedia.io 6 points 2 months ago

I mean of course he pleads "not guilty". The whole point of this trial is prove him conclusively, and irrevocably guilty. Which, fortunately will be easy given the mountains of evidence. smh.

[–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

will Wallace finding that Trump was "engaging in insurrection" be part of the prosecuting argument?

https://www.npr.org/2023/11/18/1213961050/colorado-judge-finds-trump-engaged-in-insurrection-but-keeps-him-on-ballot