this post was submitted on 31 Aug 2024
295 points (97.7% liked)

politics

19097 readers
3434 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 31 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ignirtoq@fedia.io 114 points 2 months ago (2 children)

He and his allies have made the chaotic withdrawal from Afghanistan a central focus of their criticisms of the Biden administration’s handling of national security and foreign policy.

What I consistently don't see brought up is the fact that the "chaotic withdrawal" was directly set up by Trump. He signed the agreement with Afghanistan that put a fixed date on the withdrawal squarely in the next President's term. This gave enemies a clear timetable of US actions beforehand, which gave them a significant advantage. So Biden was left with the choice of either fulfilling the US promise, despite it being in every way a bad construct, and executing an extremely difficult withdrawal, or harming the US image on the global stage by reneging on an already agreed upon deal.

I would go so far as to say this, like the expiration of the middle class portion of the Trump tax cuts, was specifically designed to make the next administration, which was always very likely to be Democrat, look bad regardless of the cost or collateral damage.

[–] barsquid@lemmy.world 46 points 2 months ago (3 children)

You don't see it brought up because all media is either journalistically bankrupt or far-right propaganda.

[–] CleoTheWizard@lemmy.world 12 points 2 months ago

Wild how the news bias is explained by its owners, 90% of whom are right wing billionaires or their companies. People wondering why CNN is “suddenly” airing Trump propaganda are in the dark

[–] Brown5500@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 months ago

No, no, almost all of it is left center. A credible source keeps telling me that

[–] teamevil@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

Especially so if the right accuses said media of being liberal.

[–] dudinax@programming.dev 12 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I don't think it would have hurt US image more to re-invade. The Taliban aren't much loved.

What irks me is everyone buying into the "botched withdrawal" yeah it was chaotic. It inevitably would be chaotic, but it was well executed given the circumstances.

Most of the suggestions on how it could have been better amounted to staying indefinitely, or a re-invasion, or even attacking the Afghan government.

[–] InvertedParallax@lemm.ee 79 points 2 months ago (3 children)

He not only publicly attacked a Gold Star family, he spent years shitting on McCain for being as soldier "who got captured".

I cannot believe this stupidity is getting any traction.

It's like Hitler suddenly being unpopular because they found out he listened to jazz.

[–] 0000011110110111i@lemm.ee 11 points 2 months ago

He not only publicly attacked a Gold Star family, he spent years shitting on McCain for being as soldier "who got captured".

And yet he still got elected to the White House. Let’s get real. This Arlington debacle won’t really do much damage to him.

[–] WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)

He not only publicly attacked a Gold Star family, he spent years shitting on McCain for being as soldier “who got captured”.

He was on the offensive when he did those things. Now he's on the defensive. When you appear strong, anything is permissible, but when you appear weak suddenly many of the things people turned a blind eye to before become problems.

[–] InvertedParallax@lemm.ee 4 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Anybody who falls for this is absolute trash, the truth doesn't change because you're strong or weak, the only people who think that are stupid cowards too spineless to stand for anything.

[–] dirthawker0@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

That probably describes a good chunk of Trump supporters. They are very enamored by the idea of strength and the terms they use reflect that influence it has on their world. The idea that America is presently diminished and will become great = a strong and respected nation leading other nations. The desire for hypermasculine men and submissive women. If their leader looks weak, they're sensitive to that. They'll deny it as long as they can, of course. But there could very well be a point where the collective feeling turns away from Trump.

[–] troglodytis@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Little pink houses for you and me

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

...? So people should be giving him a pass on this? Wtf

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 19 points 2 months ago (1 children)

No, it's just weird that this is the final straw for anyone. Like it's great if even one person wakes up because of this incident and recognizes that they were completely wrong about the guy, and we should continue to criticize every failure and prosecute every crime. But he was a piece of shit before the incident. We knew he was a piece of shit, and you either needed to also be a piece of shit or have your head entirely up your own ass to not see it before.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

I would agree with everything you wrote here but this quote is confusing:

I cannot believe this stupidity is getting any traction.

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

That part wasn't me, but I think it means that it is weird that this story is the one that is getting under the skin. Trump has done many more disrespectful and criminal things, so it seems odd that suddenly people care.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I still haven't seen evidence that Republicans do care. This is written by the New York times. All the same people who (rightly) care about trump misdeeds care about this too. I don't understand the original comment I responded to. It's really easy to read it as "no one should care about this" though

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

That's a reasonable question. Election day is coming, so we're going to find out soon enough.

[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 36 points 2 months ago (1 children)

This story stands out because it's one of the few that will stick to him. The damage, IMO, is done. All the votes, mostly Vets, that will be lost, are lost. It's good, though, that he tries to recover from it because it will only remind everyone of the event.

[–] rayyy@lemmy.world 15 points 2 months ago

The story stands out, and will stick because it attracts attention from people who respect the sacrifices made by fallen soldiers and who don't necessarily follow politics. That is a whole different subgroup of people.

[–] itsgroundhogdayagain@lemmy.ml 26 points 2 months ago (1 children)

This dude only has 1 suit and 1 tie

[–] RustyShackleford@literature.cafe 31 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Having his attire always appearing the same suit makes it easier for the messy days, when he’s shat up his back or requires multiple changes.

[–] frunch@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago

His handlers really have their hands full

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 23 points 2 months ago (1 children)

He repeated the accusation at an event in Washington on Friday night hosted by Moms for Liberty, a conservative activist group focused on education.

He repeated the accusation at an event in Washington on Friday night hosted by Moms for Liberty, a ~~conservative~~ fascist activist group focused on education.

FTFY

“I said, ‘I think I have to talk about it now.’ My people said, ‘Don’t do it, sir, don’t do it,’” Mr. Trump told the crowd. “But if I don’t tell you the story, you’re going to read — it was the front page of The Washington Post.”

Keep it up! Don't listen to your people. Trust your gut. Keep talking about how badly you fucked up.

“You know, I do the weave,” he said. “You know what ‘the weave’ is? I’ll talk about like nine different things that they all come back brilliantly together. And it’s like — and friends of mine that are like English professors, they say, ‘It’s the most brilliant thing I’ve ever seen.’”

It's like, brilliant how you, like talk about whatever and, I dunno, like weave a tapestry. Wow, I just shit out some truly poetic stuff right there.

Mr. Trump said the country was “being poisoned” by illegal immigration, adding that “schools and children are suffering greatly” because migrants in some cities had been temporarily sheltered in schools. “They are going into classrooms and taking their seats, and they don’t even speak English,” he said.

Racist.

[–] leadore@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago

Oh, I thought "the weave" was how they weave his hairs together to hold them in place to cover the bald spots.

[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 12 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] Snapz@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

Un-American

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

The "liberal media" sure is trying to limit this fallout, too. Not that much coverage. Should be above-the-fold type of stuff in very clear headlines, nearly everywhere.