this post was submitted on 30 Aug 2024
38 points (89.6% liked)

New Communities

16840 readers
189 users here now

A place to post new communities all over Lemmy for discovery and promotion.

Rules

The rules may be more established as time goes on, but it's important to have a foundation to work on.

1. Follow the rules of Lemmy.world - These rules are the same as Mastodon.world's rules, which can be found here.

2. Include a community title and description in your post title. - A following example of this would be New Communities - A place to post new communities all over Lemmy for discovery and promotion.

3. Follow the formatting. - The formatting as included below is important for people getting universal links across Lemmy as easily as possible.

Formatting

Please include this following format in your post:

[link text](/c/community@instance.com)

This provides a link that should work across instances, but in some cases it won't

You should also include either:

!community@instance.com

or instance.com/c/community

FAQ:

Q: Why do I get a 404?

A: At least one user in an instance needs to search for a community before it gets fetched. Searching for the community will bring it into the instance and it will fetch a few of the most recent posts without comments. If a user is subscribed to a community, then all of the future posts and interactions are now in-sync.

Q: When I try to create a post, the circle just spins forever. Why is that?

A: This is a current known issue with large communities. Sometimes it does get posted, but just continues spinning, but sometimes it doesn't get posted and continues spinning. If it doesn't actually get posted, the best thing to do is try later. However, only some people seem to be having this problem at the moment.

Image Attribution:

Fahmi, CC BY 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0, via Wikimedia Commons

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Another SFW community: !guitarporn@sfw.community . Whether you have a large collection or just that one special piece of gear that you love, this is the place for you to show it off.

all 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Chinchillax@lemm.ee 28 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (4 children)

Is it too late to avoid perpetuating the Reddit culture of adding “Porn” to titles of Fediverse communities?

As you can see in your title and description for this post, you have to stop and reiterate every time that your community is safe for work. It’s just bad branding.

Why not:

sublimeguitars

stunningguitars

pureguitars

guitar-awe

Woah, imagine niche communities of incredible photography that all use -awe, as a suffix. And then there’s an accompanying sister community with -aww as a suffix.

Could have everything cute that features a guitar and a puppy or whatever in guitaraww. And stunning guitar gear and photography in guitarawe.

[–] SatyrSack@lemmy.one 13 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I am not a fan of that naming scheme, but it definitely predates Reddit. I remember the old Saw films being described as "torture porn".

[–] ademir@lemmy.eco.br 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

isnt reddit older than Saw?

[–] HonkTonkWoman@lemm.ee 2 points 1 week ago

Maybe, but it was the marketing industry that beat that dead horse first. They killed that horse back in the 90’s & it was already pretty lumpy by the time Reddit got ahold of it in ‘05.

Doesn’t make the Reddit use any more palpable, just saying it’s been around for a bit…

[–] FourPacketsOfPeanuts@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

that was the beginning of the change, when it was still meant pegoratively and implied the watcher was getting some sort of perverse thrill out of it. later things like 'earth porn', 'food porn', 'guitar porn' are just stupid and rely on the really unpleasant trend of using "porn" to mean anything mildly interesting

[–] rglullis@communick.news 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The "implied perverse thrill" seems a bit of projection on your part, and the idea of "visually appealing/stimulating images that have no context and at best provide a simulacrum of interest in the object or activity" is a very good definition of porn.

[–] FourPacketsOfPeanuts@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

The “implied perverse thrill” seems a bit of projection on your part

You can read the critical reception of the film yourself here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saw_(film)#Critical_response

A sample of adjectives: "nasty", "nihilistic", "mean", "insinuatingly creepy", "derivative", "loathsome", and, yes, "perverse"

“visually appealing/stimulating images that have no context and at best provide a simulacrum of interest in the object or activity”

what a silly self serving definition. "porn" has a particular meaning which you can look up in the OED, Cambridge, Websters etc. Definition 3 is how it was used - with negtive connotation - for "torture porn" and (the example in MW) "the pornography of violence".

The extension of that to mudane everyday things (food, cars, guitars) and especially when the material shared typically falls well short of "sensational" is just a lazy habit that reddit picked up (and other online spaces too) that I, and clearly others in this thread, think Lemmy wouldbe better without. etto...

[–] rglullis@communick.news 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yeah, it's a bit self-serving. Thing is, I could not think of other term to convey this idea as succinctly. Maybe "Fetish" would be better, but it would still carry sexual connotations.

[–] FourPacketsOfPeanuts@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Why does everything have to be sexualised and sensationalised? That's encouraged on Reddit, and any other profit driven social media, because they're bending over backwards to bleed you dry of engagement. It's thoroughly unpleasant.

Lemmy has a chance to be something different. BestGuitarPics is what you're actually curating. Or AwesomeGuitarPics if you want a little something extra. Jamming "Porn" on to everything just to try and stir a sense of interest is just sad.

[–] rglullis@communick.news 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

"Best Guitar Pics" is dull and completely unimaginative. It's the "Microsoft Approach of Naming Products (TM)"; which does not allow itself to take any risks and ends up being soulless, corporate, empty. Or to use a more contemporary reference: it's the type of slop that ChatGPT would produce if someone asked "suggest a name for a community for people to share pictures of guitars".

[–] FourPacketsOfPeanuts@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

"Best Guitar Pics"

merely an example. Be sure to let BestOfLemmy etc know..

"dull and completely unimaginative"

and your solution is to tack "Porn" on the end? oh dear

[–] rglullis@communick.news 1 points 1 week ago

You are choosing to ignore the rationale for the name:

  • visually stimulating pictures
  • lacking deeper meaning
  • poor substitute or connection with the actual object/activity

"Best", "Awesome", "Aww" and any other suggestions that I've heard do not convey these ideas. And to me these ideas must be expressed. If you can come up with anything that can succinctly make these points across without resorting to porn/fetish analogies, then I will gladly consider them. But if you just want me to change it because it offends your sensibilities, then I am sorry but I will simply ignore you.

[–] Coelacanth@feddit.nu 9 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I've honestly never had that much of a problem with the terminology. They're communities for posting titillating and visually stimulating pictures on a theme. Pictures of desirable things - often out of reach for us average people - that provide pleasure just by looking at them. That's pretty close to porn, no?

Maybe I've just not grown up in an environment that stigmatised porn enough to get the objection?

[–] Today@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Guitars are given names, have human characteristics (voice, curves, etc.) frequently described as sexy. I think guitars and cars deserve porn sites.

[–] rglullis@communick.news 5 points 2 weeks ago

There is also !carporn@sfw.community, if you want to join.

[–] rglullis@communick.news 5 points 2 weeks ago

I usually share the opinion that making sexual references to everything is silly, but in the case for the communities that are based on Reddit's "SFW Network", it seems appropriate.

If you think about it, all these communities are just sharing visually stimulating images and are intended to be consumed without significant context. This is pretty much the definition of porn.

If anything, I kind like the idea of having a name in the community that reminds you that of you shouldn't be spending too much time on...

[–] Tywele@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 2 weeks ago

I wish we could leave behind this stupid naming scheme.

[–] Coelacanth@feddit.nu 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

@rgullis@communick.news I think something is wrong with your link in the OP. The period after "community" is included, which screws the redirect (at least on Sync).

[–] rglullis@communick.news 6 points 2 weeks ago

Thank you! Fixed now.

"guitar porn"

can we not?