this post was submitted on 26 Aug 2024
56 points (100.0% liked)

PC Gaming

8230 readers
868 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old

Makes sense.

If you're a PE firm, it's obvious there's some quick cash to be grabbed in a rip-and-run sale of the foundry assets. Sure it'd fuck Intel but that's not your problem after you cash the check.

And there's also a good case that could be made that the design side is valuable and the foundry isn't worth what's being spent because, after all, AMD is competing just fine without having to invest endless billions.

Of course, if you're Intel, you don't WANT to just be a design firm and rely on some 3rd party to make your shit, and so, you do this.

[–] Omega_Jimes@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 weeks ago

Didn't the us government give them 3bn to build foundries stateside?