Welcome to the Unpopular Opinion community!
How voting works:
Vote the opposite of the norm.
If you agree that the opinion is unpopular give it an arrow up. If it's something that's widely accepted, give it an arrow down.
Guidelines:
Tag your post, if possible (not required)
Rules:
1. NO POLITICS
Politics is everywhere. Let's make this about [general] and [lemmy] - specific topics, and keep politics out of it.
2. Be civil.
Disagreements happen, but that doesn’t provide the right to personally attack others. No racism/sexism/bigotry.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Shitposts and memes are allowed but...
Only until they prove to be a problem. They can and will be removed at moderator discretion.
5. No trolling.
This shouldn't need an explanation. If your post or comment is made just to get a rise with no real value, it will be removed. You do this too often, you will get a vacation to touch grass, away from this community for 1 or more days. Repeat offenses will result in a perma-ban.
Instance-wide rules always apply. https://legal.lemmy.world/tos/
I'm always amused at the downvotes it collects. People hammering a button to acknowledge their dislike of something they are choosing to not block.
My only problem with these bots is that I don't want them counted toward comments - I hate going in to find the only comments are bots.
My only problem with these bots is that I don't want them counted toward comments - I hate going in to find the only comments are bots.
Agreed.
Blocking it does not stop it's misinformation. I'm not opposed to bots or it's layout in a comment. I'm opposed to having a blatantly biased source masquerading as an unbiased gatekeeper of credibility. You cannot block that.
I'm surprised we haven't seen an alternative news community on another instance than Lemmyworld and lemmy.ml emerge as an alternative without such bot.
Seems like the LW mods/admins don't want to change their opinion on the bot, so the expected reaction would be to see people leave those communities for others.
People just like complaining. They honestly just have too much free time
Sounds reasonable
Blocking it does not stop it's misinformation. I'm not opposed to bots or it's layout in a comment. I'm opposed to having a blatantly biased source masquerading as an unbiased gatekeeper of credibility. You cannot block that.
The irony of a comment reviewing the bias of some article is that someone else will always claim that the review is also biased. It's inevitable and unavoidable.
You can avoid that by at least being internally consistent though.
No, I don't think you can.
So you’re smart enough to realize it’s “blatantly biased” but others aren’t so we need to get rid of it?
It’s kind of like Lemmy users don’t understand that this is a decentralized platform where you can connect to it and do whatever you want. The whole point is for it to not be regulated by any one entity.
The way you can “take it down” is by building a better instance (or sponsoring someone else to), maintain/manage it, etc. It’s strange to me that you expect your instance operator and/or the platform at large to implement blocking a specific bot just for you, especially when your account is basically on the default “how to use Lemmy” instance.
So we shouldn't fight misinformation? We should just cede that space to whoever shows up with a bot?
No thank you.
So I’m no expert on the bot but it seems like the hard right crowd are the ones crying about it being misinformation.
You’re on a federated, P2P (as far as instances go) platform not expecting to find misinformation from a bot; meanwhile you got all sorts of “user” accounts posting fake propaganda every other post and real humans with equally problematic opinions but for some reason the bot that might be inaccurate (maybe because it’s a BOT) seems to be the breaking point.
I’ve said my piece, I’m not really so interested in this topic to keep drilling down endlessly. The whole thing is fucking stupid.
it seems like the hard right crowd are the ones crying about it being misinformation.
Hahahahaha no.
And I call out those posters when I see it too.
Just block it.
I did but that doesnt remove the comment counter for the bots comment from the post feed. So i think there is something to engage with but nope, just the shitty bot that serves no actual purpose to begin with. Nobody double checks and audits the bot so its completely worthless.
Blocking it does not stop it's misinformation. I'm not opposed to bots or it's layout in a comment. I'm opposed to having a blatantly biased source masquerading as an unbiased gatekeeper of credibility. You cannot block that.
I have never ever even seen that bot.
It’s in the news communities on Lemmy.world
I don't use the comms where this bot pops up (for unrelated reasons) so I'll comment the following as an external observer.
May I be honest? I think that both sides are being muppets.
People defending that bot are mostly saying two things:
You are not solving the problem, you're just knee-jerk reacting to the other side's whining. I don't need more than a quick glance at the bot's profile to know that the bot is bloody hated by the users. This shite should be fixed or ditched, because as it stands it is not doing what a bot is supposed to do, to provide desirable functionality to the users.
People complaining about that bot: the group above might be knee-jerk reacting to your whining, but you're still regardless whining, like a herd of redditors and unlike decent people. If it's clear that your complains are falling into deaf ears, pack up your things and leave, nurture competing communities without that bloody bot.
I like the bot but never upvote it because it's a bot...
I think that this goes for both sides - there should be plenty people like you, who like it and don't upvote it, as well as plenty more people who dislike it but aren't downvoting it.
(I typically vote on bot content because it's useful as feedback for the maintainer, as well as helping with post/comment sorting.)