this post was submitted on 20 Aug 2024
186 points (97.4% liked)

World News

38968 readers
3492 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] would_be_appreciated@lemmy.ml 12 points 2 months ago

tax of 1.7% to 3.5% to the richest 0.5% of the country's households

We could try something more like a 95% wealth tax and really fix some problems.

[–] Fiivemacs@lemmy.ca 10 points 2 months ago

Tax em so hard they can't kill the planet anymore.

[–] Badeendje@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Two thousand one hundred.. billion.

2.100.000.000.000

By marginally taxing a group of people you could fit on a cruise ship....

[–] DJDarren@thelemmy.club 6 points 2 months ago

Yes yes, true, but then they would have less money. They might even have to rescind their membership of the Three Comma Club, and could you have that on your conscience?

[–] zcd@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 months ago

Could raise a lot more than that

[–] mox@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I wonder how much money could be raised without new or raised taxes, but simply by closing tax ~~evasion~~ avoidance loopholes used by rich people and corporations.

[–] urfavlaura@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

how about we just kill the 1000 richest people on earth and take their wealth

[–] Icalasari@fedia.io 8 points 2 months ago

That does seem more realistic than them allowing people to take their wealth. I swear they are like dragons - They'll cling to their hoard even if it means their death

[–] MediaBiasFactChecker@lemmy.world -5 points 2 months ago

Common Dreams - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for Common Dreams:

MBFC: Left - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://www.commondreams.org/news/global-wealth-tax
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support