this post was submitted on 16 Aug 2024
402 points (97.4% liked)

Science Memes

11071 readers
5049 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 34 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 34 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Bleach has a wet time of 10 minutes!

[–] boogetyboo@aussie.zone 8 points 3 months ago

Yep the rule is always to bleach the things that need it and do everything else while you're waiting for the wet time to pass.

[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 33 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I'm no physicist, but I think wet time is what happens when regular time gets wet.

[–] zippythezigzag@lemm.ee 7 points 3 months ago

is that why Mondays are such a drain?

[–] Krackalot@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 3 months ago

That's why Aquaman will never be tasked with protecting the sacred timeline. Also, IP infringement, but mostly the moisture thing.

[–] shneancy@lemmy.world 28 points 3 months ago (2 children)

fun fact! the opacity of audio effects is instead described by a scale from wet to dry, with full wet being 100% "opacity" and dry being 0% "opacity"

[–] blx@lemmy.zip 13 points 3 months ago (1 children)

That's nice and all, but I have no idea what either "wet" or "opaque" mean in relation to sound =(

[–] shneancy@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

sound effects, or more properly audio effects - are things like pitch shifts or reverb, you apply them onto a clip and they modify how said clip sounds. If you later decide you added too much of say reverb you can always lower the wetness of that effect, in the same way you'd see a layer of a picture halfway through you can now hear the sound effect halfway through!

[–] blx@lemmy.zip 4 points 3 months ago

Got it! Thanks for taking the time to explain it!

[–] LordGimp@lemm.ee 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Is opacity the same as clarity in this context? Like a wet song being like a cd where as if you switched to radio it'd be more dry? I'm imagining a burst of static as a drop in opacity.

[–] shneancy@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

dang, sorry i should've given more context to that, as a regular picture drawer i referred to image editing without realising others might not have the same point of reference for what opacity is

imagine you have a picture of pure white, you then add a layer of pure black, but you change the opacity of the black layer to 50%, which then shows your final picture as grey. Using more specific terms you changed the value of the alpha channel of the black layer to only be halfway visible.

This is what i was referring to as "opacity". Now with your example it'd work in the opposite way, at the risk of making it more confusing (i apologise in advance).

A CD song wouldn't be wet or dry.

You can take your CD song and apply an equaliser filter effect and make it sound like radio.

Now that filter has a wet to dry slider.

If you slide it all the way to dry you won't hear the changes the filter has made and you'll hear the original CD release quality. If you slide it all the way to wet you'll hear a modified version that sounds like radio, if you put it halfway through you'll hear, in a way, half of the effect you applied.

it's much easier to explain when you just have the thing in front of you and can hear the difference hah

[–] ramble81@lemm.ee 24 points 3 months ago (2 children)

So what are some normal wet times?

[–] ryannathans@aussie.zone 21 points 3 months ago (1 children)

2 minutes, 5 minutes, 10 minutes

[–] Tyfud@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

I upvoted you, but I wasn't happy about it.

[–] SpookyGenderCommunist@hexbear.net 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, I'd love to see a chart of some kind, for this

[–] Kalkaline@leminal.space 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Depends on the specific product and formulation. It's best to refer to the labeling on that particular product. Not all cleaners are equally effective on all pathogens.

[–] ryannathans@aussie.zone 1 points 3 months ago

When in doubt use fire

[–] hddsx@lemmy.ca 16 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I thought it was called dwell time

[–] DamienGramatacus@lemmy.world 17 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I thought it was called contact time

[–] Kushan@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I thought it was called adventure time

[–] d00ery@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)
[–] BreadOven@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

I've usually heard contact time as well.

[–] Reddfugee42@lemmy.world 13 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Ben Shapiro told me there's no such thing

[–] ArmokGoB@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Unless you run it through an autoclave, it's a matter of statistics. Still, 99.99% clean is better than 0% clean.

[–] YeetPics@mander.xyz 11 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Had to explain how iso alcohol is a poor disinfectant earlier today and I'm still mad about it.

[–] HelixDab2@lemm.ee 12 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Depends on what the concentration is, IIRC. 70% is better than 90%.

[–] shikogo@pawb.social 7 points 3 months ago (3 children)

That seems counterintuitive, why?

[–] Shard@lemmy.world 13 points 3 months ago

ELI5 answer is 90% alcohol dries out the bacteria too fast and it converts into a bacterial spore with a hard shell that protects its insides.

70% alcohol gives it time to penetrate the cell wall and "dissolve" the insides of the bacteria, either killing it or rendering it non infective.

[–] modus@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago (1 children)

From what I understand, the water helps "penetrate" the cell walls of bacteria and deliver the lethal dose of alcohol. Take out more water and it's unable to penetrate and murder things as efficiently.

[–] roguetrick@lemmy.world 11 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Alcohol and water are both polar and form hydrogen bonds, but of differing strength. You want those bonds to switch, which creates conformational changes and rips the structure of proteins apart. If you just replace all the bonds with alcohol you'll develop a new, although denatured, stable configuration which can keep the cell wall intact. Instead you want to keep developing new stresses on it until it breaks. Neither can really penetrate the phospholipid membrane of the cell because it's nonpolar, but those conformational changes create big holes where the surface proteins are.

[–] Clasm@ttrpg.network 4 points 3 months ago

Iirc, the higher water content keeps the alcohol from evaporating off as fast, keeping it in contact with the surface for a longer period of time.

[–] moosetwin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 3 months ago (1 children)

unrelated, but does that mf have an iron cross on his shirt?

[–] Akasazh@feddit.nl 2 points 3 months ago

Iron shirt, or harness