this post was submitted on 09 Aug 2024
520 points (98.5% liked)

politics

19107 readers
3364 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 39 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] NegativeInf@lemmy.world 92 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Meanwhile, Trump only has 1 campaign event per week and spends the rest of the time begging billionaires for money and golfing.

Low energy old man.

[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 38 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Not so different from while he was in office then.

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

he was rallying way more while he was in office even though there was no campaign

[–] GladiusB@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

Small dick energy

[–] InternetUser2012@lemmy.today 1 points 3 months ago

He's working on his exit plan since he knows he's going to lose and that means jail. Personally it's a toss up on where I'd like to see him go, N. Korea or Russia. I think it'd be worse for him in NK, but it would be interesting to see how he fairs in a country that he owes half a billion to.

[–] Bumblefumble@lemm.ee 68 points 3 months ago (3 children)

I really hope this is gonna be a landslide election and it's possible for the Dems to take a page out of Waltz' book and pass a whole bunch of meaningful legislation, which will help carry on support for the Dems next election as well. But oh well, I might be too optimistic.

[–] CoggyMcFee@lemmy.world 33 points 3 months ago (2 children)

If we want that then it’s not enough to just get Harris into office. We’ve got to win Congress. And we’ve got to win enough of the Senate that any would-be Manchins can’t stop everything. That’s the only way to pass meaningful legislation.

[–] Bumblefumble@lemm.ee 18 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Yes, that's why it needs to be a landslide, we need enough political power to actually enact change.

[–] CoggyMcFee@lemmy.world 16 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I just want to make sure the people in the back are aware of this too, because I’ve heard lots of people complain that the Dems didn’t do things in the past four years that they would need real control to do

[–] Bumblefumble@lemm.ee 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Definitely, my hope is that if that doesn't happen this time, the momentum will carry forward to the next election as well and the electorate will see that the Dems can actually make life better for people. But it's a dream, I know that.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

I have a feeling that certain wanna-be John Galts that have just enough power would do things to make people miserable enough to blame their experiences on Democratic policies.

Can't have the threat of a good example.

[–] InternetUser2012@lemmy.today 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The ones saying that are the trolls and bots.

[–] CoggyMcFee@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It’s impossible to know, but I suspect some are trolls and bots, and some aren’t.

[–] InternetUser2012@lemmy.today 1 points 3 months ago

It's pretty easy to tell a troll though, look at their post history. They all do the same things.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago

I'm prepared to be surprised. This ticket is a godsend for down ticket Democrats.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 28 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

About 2 or 3 weeks ago I would have thought that kind of talk is way too optimistic. Now that Biden stepped aside, Kamala stepped up, and most people rallied around her, and you add in Walz now...well, damn, I'm trying to think of a time where I've ever been this optimistic about the Democrats.

And I'm one of the people that was lukewarm about Kamala (at best). I'm going to vote like my life depends on it even though I'm not in a swing state, but still...

[–] eran_morad@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

2008 was fucking electric. This isn’t quite that level, but I’m excited. Kamala’s performance has that same Obama competence and organization.

[–] petrol_sniff_king@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

The votes in non-swing states still contribute to overwhelming support and popularity, which we'll need when Trump's cronies try to undermine the election.

You're not as pivotal as a Georgian, but you're still very valuable. <3

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It is truly awful that people in certain states, and definitely in remote areas, definitely have their vote count more so than in others. It's definitely ironic given that California is so key to our country, and yet....the people there are treated, electorally, like second-class citizens.

It is, yeah. The electoral college isn't specifically what I was referring to, but yeah, it would be nice if something like the Interstate Compact could get enough traction to do what it needs to.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 7 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Walz would end up being President of the Senate. He'd be well placed to direct that very effort.

[–] demizerone@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago (2 children)

What worries me is the Republican party is too far gone to be reasonable, but at least Mitch McConnell is retiring...

[–] frezik@midwest.social 8 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The party probably can't continue after Trump. It'll splinter into warring factions trying to out purity each other and go nowhere.

Watch for that, because it's an opportunity for a real leftist party to emerge.

[–] Gaspar@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 3 months ago

I've been saying for years now that every politician with an R after their name needs to be removed from government. Then, the existing Democrat party can logically splinter into its own progressive/moderate/conservative divisions (I might not agree with Democratic conservatives, but at least they're not completely insane and can be reasoned with).

What a hopeful thought, that the Republicans might finally do this to themselves. I hope you're right.

[–] InternetUser2012@lemmy.today 1 points 3 months ago

He's still keeping his seat though isn't he?

[–] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 54 points 3 months ago

"Can't hear you, too busy enacting the will of the people"

[–] Snapz@lemmy.world 29 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Harris to trump,

"Sorry, I wasn't listening... what did you just lie, felon?"

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 7 points 3 months ago

That's a nice one

[–] Empricorn@feddit.nl 16 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Smart. Trump has gotten away with lying so much, the fact-checks come after he has already drowned the issue in more lies. This even happened live, in debates and interviews! Playing catch-up with his word-vomit is not an option...

[–] Linktank@lemmy.today 0 points 3 months ago

Well it's easy to get away with it in the debates when the moderators don't say a fucking word, even when Rump is saying things like "You and I know... -" and then goes on to tell some atrocious lie.

Worthless.

[–] fox2263@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago

Should’ve said she was busy speaking to her massive crowds

[–] carl_dungeon@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Not sure trump has ever met a voter

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 2 points 3 months ago

He has. He was disappointed to find out they were poor.