Back in the day the best way to find cool sites when you were on a cool site was to click next in the webring. In this age of ailing search engines and confidently incorrect AI, it is time for the webring to make a comeback.

This person has given his the code to get started: Webring

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] bobdobberson@dobbs.town 42 points 3 months ago (6 children)

@mrpalmer16 one of my favorite things back in the day was the old-school "StumbleUpon" which was like webrings on crack.

Unfortunately, advertising and profit-seeking happened.

[–] speeding_slug@feddit.nl 14 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Ah man, those times were great. Bored? Just push the button and you'll see something new. No scrolling, just a new website with random interesting stuff to explore.

[–] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Old StumbleUpon was everything to me

[–] Jarix@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago

Wow i got hit right in the nostalgies thinking about StumbleUpon

load more comments (1 replies)

[–] telmii_poo@jorts.horse 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

@bobdobberson @mrpalmer16 omg YES stumbleupon was incredible! I've asked around if people remember this and it seems that not a ton of people were on there.

load more comments (1 replies)

load more comments (4 replies)

[+] peteramthor@dice.camp 38 points 3 months ago (3 children)

[deleted]

[–] lemmyvore@feddit.nl 17 points 3 months ago

It will happen out of necessity once LLMs make search engines useless. Bookmarks and human-curated content will be the only way to find stuff.

It's already affecting small businesses worldwide, who aren't being discovered anymore by searches in their local area.

[–] MalReynolds@slrpnk.net 13 points 3 months ago (1 children)

So would people having webpages instead of social media accounts

And there's your problem... (in the voice of Jamie Hyneman, Mythbusters). To see a real return of webrings, people would need to have (make) their own pages and curate some links.

Thinking about it, with the rise of selfhosted, it's actually really viable, cobble together a docker stack with a WYSIWYG HTML editor somewhat oriented to the task (pretty sure something out there can be repurposed), a web server, proxy, and that's about it (probably missing a fair bit, not my bailiwick, still, once the stack is made and solid, I'm guessing many would host, I would). Set a threshold of how many people you're willing to host, say 50 or whatever so you're able to check for CSAM or other legal minefields, and Bob's your uncle, stir in some solid security to keep it isolated if you're using it at home (or VPS) and it's golden.

OK, more complicated than I initially thought, and it's way less friction to use something like faceplant, which is entirely their point. Still, I think, if given the opportunity, and functional tools, and low enough friction, many would prefer to have a hand curated presence on the web above a facebook page.

I'll stop, but thanks for the interesting thought seed.

[–] chip@feddit.rocks 10 points 3 months ago (3 children)

There has to be a cultural shift as well. It's not the early 2000s anymore where a substantial portion of internet users could tinker around their desktop computers. I recently got fiber at home and we're locked behind CGNAT. I could look for a solution for myself since I grew up opening ports on my router, but imagine someone who grew up with bubble-wrapped smartphones trying to navigate their way through that bs.

[–] lemmyvore@feddit.nl 7 points 3 months ago

Website hosting is still a thing. Not everything needs to be self hosted.

[–] MalReynolds@slrpnk.net 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

You're not wrong, but here we are, talking open source and GPL licences. If you can make a game portal work, or the web in general, it's viable, your ISP is a choke point though, agreed. Was more talking about an easy stack like the 'arrs, but for webrings, just an idea...

load more comments (1 replies)

[–] rockSlayer@lemmy.world 36 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I love this idea, the back button on browsers feels like it exists because of webrings

[–] superkret@feddit.org 14 points 3 months ago (2 children)

It exists because web browsers used to not have tabs. Nowadays it's useless cause with modern scripted web pages you never properly get back to the site you left

[–] schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de 14 points 3 months ago (2 children)

then you're visiting websites that are badly coded

load more comments (2 replies)

[–] delirious_owl@discuss.online 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Just block JavaScript

[–] superkret@feddit.org 19 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (6 children)

Then the entire browser becomes useless. I couldn't even post this comment without JavaScript.

Edit: I wish a search engine that only showed websites without JavaScript existed.

[–] Womble@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Umatrix is great, you can configure it to automatically allow first party javascript, and if sites still dont work eneable bits until they do them lock those settings so the same bits will be enabled next time you're on that site.

[–] naught101@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

You can do that with NoScript too. Is the Umatrix UI any better, or are there other benefits?

load more comments (1 replies)

load more comments (5 replies)

[–] Andrzej@lemmy.myserv.one 35 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Gonna add my voice to those calling for a foss stumbleupon

[–] naught101@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Yeah! StumbleUpon was cool. Something about how it tried to engender serendipity.

Such a pity that so many other good recommendation engines died or succumbed to enshittification.

load more comments (1 replies)

[–] antrosapien@lemmy.ml 28 points 3 months ago (4 children)

Kagi is also experimenting with small web

https://kagi.com/smallweb/

[–] probablynaked@lemmy.world 11 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Man I wanna like Kagi but I keep reading batshit things from its founder

load more comments (2 replies)

[–] CancerMancer@sh.itjust.works 7 points 3 months ago

Man what a trip, felt like I was hopping around the old web again.

[–] Andromxda@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 3 months ago

https://d-shoot.net/kagi.html

[–] 01189998819991197253@infosec.pub 4 points 3 months ago

This is like the old StumbleUpon! Thanks for this!

[–] maegul@lemmy.ml 20 points 3 months ago (2 children)

The idea comes up again and again on the fediverse. It feels ripe for some app/platform to kinda nail it.

I’m not sure this is it or even something that does exactly the old web ring thing. I think a simple enough system for the human curation of web pages in a standardised way that can easily be consumed and aggregated would go a long way though. The fediverse feels like its close to something.

[–] wesker@lemmy.sdf.org 11 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (3 children)

What about https://webri.ng ?

[–] maegul@lemmy.ml 4 points 3 months ago (6 children)

That seems interesting!

In the end, I'm wondering if all the pieces are here on something like the fediverse but just need to be connected. I haven't thought about this at all until now (so I'm just riffing here) ... but the essence of such a system seems to me:

Recommendations are human curated
Recommendations come from a single human (or well defined collective)
Reccommendations are organised in a navigable structure

Point 3 seems to be the unclear part. A "ring" is obviously a bunch of connections (not unlike a linked list). But other structures probably have a lot to provide here, especially if they're amenable to some basic search facility.

[–] wesker@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

You might be overthinking it, or I might be underthinking it.

When I hear "webring" I think of a simple list of sites, curated by the ring creator. And all members have a badge on their site, complete with a few nav buttons.

It was never broke, why fix it?

load more comments (1 replies)

[–] Adalast@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Aside from 3 you are essentially creating Stumble Upon.

load more comments (1 replies)

load more comments (4 replies)

load more comments (2 replies)

[–] kionite231@lemmy.ca 5 points 3 months ago (3 children)

There is also Gemini protocol!

[–] maegul@lemmy.ml 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I'm aware of it (and while not being super enthused about it, I can my personal interest growing over time as the internet keeps tracking the way it is).

But how does it help with a page recommendation system? Is there a strong culture of that sort of thing on Gemini?

load more comments (1 replies)

load more comments (2 replies)

[–] wesker@lemmy.sdf.org 15 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I'm down.

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 11 points 3 months ago

You gotta be down to know whats up.

[–] masterofn001@lemmy.ca 12 points 3 months ago

Stumbleupon was fun.

I miss old web shit.

Ninety zeros dot com was one of the Internet's weirdest best things.

[–] LastoftheDinosaurs@reddthat.com 10 points 3 months ago

This is a great idea. I didn't see a Linux subway yet, but the process for requesting new lines seems pretty simple.

[–] wetnoodle@sopuli.xyz 10 points 3 months ago

I'm in a few webrings! https://wetnoodle.org they're under the navigation menu towards the bottom

[–] Binette@lemmy.ml 8 points 3 months ago

This is so cool!

[–] bl_r@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Maia Arson Crimew, one of my favorite hackers, is in a webring https://maia.crimew.gay

[–] Angry_Autist@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

Oh man that site looks just like the internet before it started to suck.

[–] naught101@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago (3 children)

What would be really cool would be an open source, federated version of DMOZ

[–] Nerrad@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

Yes, please!

load more comments (2 replies)

[–] marcie@lemmy.ml 6 points 3 months ago

hexbear's trans comm just hooked into one! super cool

[–] fionnafire@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Neocities does this right?

load more comments (1 replies)

[–] LazerDickMcCheese@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 months ago

Couldn't agree more

[–] crozilla@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

Is the StumbleUpon thing not something Mozilla could do with Pocket?

[–] I_CAST_BEAM_OF_BATS_I_CAST_BOLT_OF_BATS@hexbear.net 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I consider ActivityPub sites to be flat-out better than other website networking options. Sure, people complain about how people establish blocklists and shit and it's not the idealized version nobody promised them that they assumed existed for some reason, but it's like adding another dimension to these projects simply by dropping a list of linked or friendly instances into an ActivityPub site about page. Simply linking to a Mastodon you also run on your own Lemmy instance remains the simplest option over dogshit like Kbin and Mbin.

load more comments