this post was submitted on 15 Jul 2024
73 points (95.1% liked)

politics

19090 readers
2767 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] LEDZeppelin@lemmy.world 43 points 3 months ago

Shooter was a republican

Shotee was a republican

Enablers of shooter were republicans

Peddlers of political violence are all republicans

Mainstream Media: “DeMoCrATiC RhEToRiC UnDeR ScutiNy foR PoLitiCAL VioLenCE”

It’s like they are not even hiding their intentions to bring about Nazi regime in power anymore

[–] ChihuahuaOfDoom@lemmy.world 25 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

Frankly, I think they should get sponsored by Glock or HK and just hand out a loaded 9mm to all attendees at the door, 20 round extended magazines too, none of those factory 15 round or pussy liberal 10 round restricted mags. When everyone has a gun, I bet they would feel so safe.

Edit: another thought; no safeties, just double action triggers. Hell, no safeties and single action triggers, bet they'd feel so damned safe.

[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Been in a few places where everyone had a gun. Feels like walk in a land of fools, and it only takes one.

[–] irish_link@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

SOME are well trained. Others not so much so then you have a ton of people self taught in terms of marksmanship going offer the fist gunman. I am sure there will be not collateral damage.

[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago

It's like driving down a road at 130 mph. Blow out one tire and you're toast. Doesn't matter which tire. Old one or new one. Doesn't matter.

[–] baldingpudenda@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

Everyone is one heavy plop on to their chairs from blowing their kneecap

[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 18 points 3 months ago

The governor is just trying to protect Republicans from each other

[–] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 15 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

What’s the matter Evers, are they dangerous or something

The schoolchildren seem to be dealing with them without any kind of problems, I feel like full grown adults should—

Oh wait

Hey hang on I think I do see what you’re getting at

And hear me out, I might have a CRAZY idea

(Honestly man I feel like it should be some kind of constitutional amendment general rule or something, like the “It was fine when it was someone else’s loved ones on the line so go fuck yourself” act or something)

[–] Kalkaline@leminal.space 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

They're only tools, super efficient killing tools. Guns don't kill people, bullets kill people.

[–] billiam0202@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

Just this morning, a guy in my neighborhood was arrested because the bullets in his gun went on a killing spree while he was asleep. It was pretty wild hearing about inanimate objects doing murdery things with no human interaction whatsoever.

[–] jpreston2005@lemmy.world 13 points 3 months ago

A short-lived effort at City Hall to ban guns within the security footprint failed because local governments like Milwaukee are precluded under state law from enacting gun regulations more stringent than the state's. Wisconsin allows both concealed carry and open carry.

Aw, are your own bullshit, moronic laws having consequences for you? What's the matter? Don't feel safe surrounded by guns in a public setting? Does that make you a huge fucking hypocrite? ABSO-FUCKING-LUTELY IT DOES.

[–] Zak@lemmy.world 10 points 3 months ago

I don't like that they can create a perimeter and inspect peoples' possessions outside the event area at all. People shouldn't have to give up their right to be free from unreasonable searches in public places.

It is, of course hilarious that Republicans created an exception for guns and suddenly don't like it.

[–] Bluefalcon@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Makes sense if you don't think about it.

[–] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Honestly man it makes perfect sense. We gave the Republicans guns and got them all amped up on violent lunacy and now it’s turned up all the way to 11; they shouldn’t be allowed to have guns anywhere NEAR the convention center, in a sensible world. However we do not live in a sensible world and whose fault is literally 100% of all of that

I SAID WHOSE FAULT IS IT EVERS

YOU FUCKIN HYPOCRITE

[–] riskable@programming.dev 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Legally, he can't take away people's guns and besides, Republicans hate that entire concept. Instead he should focus on keeping out and removing people with mental health problems.

Then it'd be a quiet and quaint little get together "under the tent" as it were with just a handful of Republicans present. Then maybe we'd see a sane nominee!

[–] anon6789@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Legally they do take people's guns, and they only hate when people try to take away their guns.

The NRA Supported Gun Control When the Black Panthers Had the Weapons History.com

Throughout the late 1960s, the militant Black nationalist group used their understanding of the finer details of California’s gun laws to underscore their political statements about the subjugation of African-Americans. In 1967, 30 members of the Black Panthers protested on the steps of the California statehouse armed with .357 Magnums, 12-gauge shotguns and .45-caliber pistols and announced, “The time has come for Black people to arm themselves.”

The display so frightened politicians—including California governor Ronald Reagan—that it helped to pass the Mulford Act, a state bill prohibiting the open carry of loaded firearms, along with an addendum prohibiting loaded firearms in the state Capitol. The 1967 bill took California down the path to having some of the strictest gun laws in America and helped jumpstart a surge of national gun control restrictions.

“The law was part of a wave of laws that were passed in the late 1960s regulating guns, especially to target African-Americans,” says Adam Winkler, author of Gunfight: The Battle Over the Right to Bear Arms. “Including the Gun Control Act of 1968, which adopted new laws prohibiting certain people from owning guns, providing for beefed up licensing and inspections of gun dealers and restricting the importation of cheap Saturday night specials [pocket pistols] that were popular in some urban communities.”

The Black Panthers were “innovators” in the way they viewed the Second Amendment at the time, says Winkler. Rather than focus on the idea of self-defense in the home, the Black Panthers brazenly took their weapons to the streets, where they felt the public—particularly African-Americans—needed protection from a corrupt government.

“These ideas eventually infiltrated into the NRA to shape the modern gun debate,” explains Winker. As gun control laws swept the nation, the organization adopted a similar stance to that of the activist group they once fought to regulate, with support for open-carry laws and concealed weapon laws high on their agenda.

Ironically, it was the gun control laws that were put into effect against African-Americans and the Black Panthers that led “rural white conservatives” across the country to fear any restriction of their own guns, Winkler says. In less than a decade, the NRA would go from backing gun control regulations to inhibit groups they felt threatened by to refusing to support any gun control legislation at all.

Nice article, and worth it to read the whole thing. Double standards aren't a new part of the game plan.

[–] meleecrits@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

Surely, just like their rhetoric to arm every teacher in schools, giving every person at the RNC a gun when they enter will make it the safest place in the world.