this post was submitted on 29 Jun 2024
17 points (79.3% liked)

politics

18998 readers
3280 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

A group of undecided Latino voters said they would vote for President Joe Biden after watching his Thursday night debate with former President Donald Trump.

...

A clip posted on X shows the group being interviewed by a journalist. One man said he would vote for Biden because "Trump sounded like a crazy liar," according to Matt A. Barreto, professor of Political Science and Chicana/o & Central American Studies at UCLA.

The man being interviewed said Trump "said the same thing time after time" and was not answering questions or "saying how he would fix things," according to a Newsweek translation.

He went on to admit that "Biden was indeed a bit slow in talking," saying the president "has a stutter" but believes Biden explained "what he has done and what he is still doing while president.

"After being undecided for a little while, I think today, I switched to Biden," he added.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BobGnarley@lemm.ee 9 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Are the undecided voters in the room with us right now?

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago (2 children)

You laugh, but I still have no idea what I'm going to do in November.

I'm in Texas, so it doesn't really matter. But its not something I enjoy thinking about.

[–] Wilzax@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago (6 children)

Texas is more purple than you think. PLEASE vote and PLEASE spread the word that every vote matters, because Trump supporters are far less defeatist than Biden supporters. Don't give them the illusion that your state is any more Republican than it already is by not voting.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Specal@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I mean I'm from the UK but votes in Texas absolutely do matter, arguably more than most states. Get your shit together man, it's not just a presidential issue, it's the entire government and the supreme court appointment at stake.

[–] knightly@pawb.social 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Being from the UK, you might be unaware that Texas is not a battleground state. As a solid Red state, votes for national offices cast there have no effect.

Sure, they can have Democrats as mayors of the urban centers, but the jerrymandered senate and congressional seats will go to Republicans.

[–] Specal@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Yes I am aware that Texas is full of morons that vote to hurt themselves. However, 5,890,347 votes were cast republican, and 5,259,126 were cast democrat. It's not as deep red sea as you believe it to be.

[–] knightly@pawb.social 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Current projections show the state not turning purple 'til the end of the decade at the earliest thanks to the influx of Republicans from California and an exodus of Democrats to blue states like Colorado.

[–] Specal@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

So... That means don't vote? I don't understand what you're trying to say to be honest

[–] knightly@pawb.social 1 points 3 months ago

My point is that working within a system that's designed to disenfranchise us is an exercise in futility, and telling people in red states to go vote is more likely to frustrate than inspire them. If voting is the beginning and end of your political participation, then you can be controlled simply by controlling who gets to be on the ballot.

When the government becomes intolerable, we must become ungovernable.

We need to build alternative structures of power that can organize around the intransigence of the State. This means forming affinity groups that serve community needs despite government opposition, like how the Black Panthers had school breakfast and literacy programs.

[–] IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago (10 children)

It’s hard to vote for Joe Biden but it’s really fucking easy to vote against Donald Trump.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago (5 children)

What, really?

I mean, holy shit, I'm not going to question divine providence from fucking Jupiter or whoever the fuck it is watching over elections, so, hey, you know, what convinces you convinces you.

[–] turbowafflz@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago (3 children)

I feel like even though biden didn't perform well, trump just said way too many obvious lies. Like saying the nazi rally in charlottesville was just a lie made up by biden?? Despite there being photos of it???

[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago (4 children)

It's basically just depends if you stayed tuned. I mean I have perfect sympathy for someone who watched the first 15 or 20 minutes and then turn it off because you know damn. However the longer it went the worst Trump got and Biden kind of leveled out though never got impressive by any means.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] GladiusB@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

It's also early. We still have 5 months and way more debates.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Dkarma@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

If you were listening for actual policy Biden crushed trump.

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago (3 children)

At least Biden attempted to directly answer questions. Trump repeatedly evaded them to talk about whatever he wanted during his allotted time.

Biden struggled to recall accurate information.

Trump effortlessly ranted and lied.

Both were embarrassing. One was worse.

[–] Auli@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Trump has never proven if he can recall accurate information either though.

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

He doesn’t need to do that for his own camp. He just needs to sound like he’s winning an argument.

The undecided voters may have been waiting for clear substantiation of goals and accomplishments. Biden did a terrible job explaining his own, but Trump was clearly evasive with the majority of his responses.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 2 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Who is "undecided" after 8 years of dealing with this clown? Have these people been in a coma?

Or is it the usual I'm embarrassed to tell you I'll be voting for fascism "undecided"?

[–] Rekorse@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Some people are actually torn between the two, their close family and community lives are so intermingled with both that they actually are both seen as reasonable choices and are waiting to hear more about them to make a decision.

I don't see anything wrong with people waiting to see the candidates speak unassisted for nearly 2 hours in a rapid fire debate setting where they had to:

  1. Lay out their vision for the future
  2. Defend past decisions since both were/are president
  3. Handle the juvenile bickering that is bound to happen

Its one of the most honest and open displays of exactly who these candidates are, and even though I was already likely to vote Biden, I do feel better after hearing his IDEAS and THOUGHTS despite how he said them.

[–] Doom@ttrpg.network 1 points 3 months ago

Switch undecided with unmotivated.

They might not care to remember to vote in November

load more comments
view more: next ›