this post was submitted on 05 May 2024
1 points (66.7% liked)

No Stupid Questions

35843 readers
1837 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Seen a lot of posts on Lemmy with vegan-adjacent sentiments but the comments are typically very critical of vegan ideas, even when they don't come from vegans themselves. Why is this topic in particular so polarising on the internet? Especially since unlike politics for example, it seems like people don't really get upset by it IRL

all 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BrikoX@lemmy.zip 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

From what I have seen, it more stems from the activism vegans are engaged in more than the actual veganism.

[–] CalciumDeficiency@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I think there's nothing wrong with explaining your ideas and why you believe them to those willing to listen, but I can see why pushy activism for any cause can get annoying quickly. There are often Jehovah's witnesses outside my local supermarket, for example, but they only give you a pamphlet if you specifically approach them

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (3 children)

It's not just pushy, it's judgemental and vitriolic

Oh, you eat meat, murderer? Your shoes are made from the skins of defenseless creatures. The sugar you're so callously adding to your coffee was processed with ground-up bones, you unredeemable monster.

Even the arguments for veganism that aren't built on animal cruelty still take on an air of moral superiority. Don't you care about the planet and future generations? How dare you trade carbon emissions for the temporary comfort of a bacon cheeseburger!

The vegan movement has always been associated with anger and contempt, even if it is justified.

[–] spankinspinach@sh.itjust.works 0 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

In my experience, your first sentence sums it up nicely.

They assume a moral high ground because they've adopted a diet that is generally deemed healthier and better for the environment (I don't always agree with this).

But unless they're also doing all the things we could all do better (e.g. not buying new, not upgrading the the latest and greatest, not taking 40 minute showers, not eating out every second day), they're only somewhat less guilty of environmental damage than the average person, but they're taking a generally undeserved "holier than thou" position and then shoving it down your throat. This isn't everyone, and I don't really care what you eat, but these are the vegans that get under my skin.

[–] BearOfaTime@lemm.ee 0 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

And it's history stems from religious ideology.

Edit: oh you downvoters. Go look it up. A woman had a vision from God that said "don't eat things with faces". Dead serious - that's where it started.

All the sciencey justifications today are post-hoc rationalization.

[–] Feyd@programming.dev 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

In my experience it's usually more like: Them: here have some of this meat thing Me: No thanks Them: why not it's really good try some Me: i don't eat meat Them: but why? Me: to reduce animal cruelty and environmental harm Them: wow how dare you be so judgy

I'm not really sure how I'm supposed to not offend this type of person in this situation and frankly I don't think it's my fault or my problem they're offended. My theory is that that agree with my reasons but rather than change or live with the cognitive dissonance they just lash out at anyone that reminds them they could be living more ethically even if they basically MAKE them say it.

Blaming vegans for that is bullshit, frankly

[–] fishos@lemmy.world -1 points 6 months ago

Some people see "to reduce animal cruelty" as judgy because that's just how nature is. The moral superiority comes from you acting like you're somehow above everyone and everything else. It's entirely in your wording and the implications that if you eat meat, you enjoy animal suffering vs seeing it as a natural outcome of nature.

[–] ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca 1 points 6 months ago (3 children)

I've been a vegetarian for 15 years. People IRL often do get offended if you tell them you don't eat meat. I try my best to avoid saying it because it often leads to being lectured about proteins. Everyone suddenly becomes a nutritionist when you explain why you don't eat meat.

[–] ZagamTheVile@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Yeah. I try not to mention it to people if I can avoid it. I work construction and am surrounded by manly men tring to out man each other. I had one guy offer me bear jerkey and got bent out of shape when I declined. He wouldn't stop. He just kept on me about why I didn't eat meat. After about an hour of him asking again and again why I don't eat meat I said "meat's another word for dick and eating dick is gay". As problematic as it was, it worked.

It never cases to amaze me that a 250pound dude with a 40oz soda in one hand and a mouthfull of gas station pizza thinks he has the responsibility to lecture me about nutrition.

[–] illi@lemm.ee 1 points 6 months ago

"meat's another word for dick and eating dick is gay". As problematic as it was, it worked.

It's both sad and hillarious that this worked. I wonder if you created a new vegetarian as well

[–] dojan@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

As a life-long vegetarian, this has been my experience as well.

[–] warm@kbin.earth 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Why do they believe you only find protein in meat?

[–] sik0fewl@lemmy.ca 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Some essential amino acids are difficult to find in adequate quantities on a vegan diet. If you don't vary your protein sources or make sure you are getting the right amino acids, then you may develop a deficiency, which can lead to poor health or even be fatal.

[–] hroderic@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

Do-gooder derogation Basically, some people perceive others' moral choices as criticism or as some kind of bragging.

[–] Drusas@kbin.run 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

So many vegans in this thread tring to answer the question and getting it completely wrong.

[–] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

There are some very militant vegans out here on Lemmy, equating eating meat with rape and murder and generally being annoying without actually contributing to the discussions.

They are actively harming their cause. So much so, I suspect them of actually being trolls trying to make vegans look bad.

Or they are just dumb as a brick and don't understand common discourse. That's possible too.

[–] iiGxC@slrpnk.net 0 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Well if you support the rape and murder of animals (both common in animal agriculture) don't be surprised when people get upset

[–] NoIWontPickAName@kbin.earth 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Thank you for proving everyone’s point. This is the .01% I was talking about @CalciumDeficiency@lemmy.world

[–] iiGxC@slrpnk.net 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Eh, sometimes it makes sense to just call things as they are instead of trying to tiptoe around peoples feelings.

If you don't think artificial insemination is a form of rape/sexual violation, then idk what kind of meaningful discussion we can have. If you don't think unnecessary killing is murder, then again idk what kind of meaningful discussion we can have. (Note that there's not really any good reason for the term "murder" to only apply to humans. If someone kills your dog would you be opposed to the use of the word "murder" then?)

[–] mortemtyrannis@lemmy.ml 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Do you refer to animals predating other animals as murder too?

[–] jacktherippah@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I don't hate veganism. It's a dietary choice and that's fine. What I hate is vegans. They're always pushy and judgmental and hateful and sometimes even destructive in their activism. They're an annoying group of people and I just don't want to have to deal with them.

[–] Tywele@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Veganism is not a dietary choice it's a lifestyle choice. Diet is just a big part of it but not the whole thing.

[–] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Then what would we call someone who makes the dietary choice but none of the other lifestyle choices? How would they identify in a restaurant setting? The answer is "vegan". In the same way that I'm vegetarian but don't care if I wear leather shoes.

I'm not saying you're wrong, I'm saying that English lacks the words that would let you be precise. We need a word for people who are vegan in diet, and don't care to bother the rest of the world about it. That's why OPs question keeps coming up.

[–] Garbanzo@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

No one likes being criticized and labeled a monster by an ignorant prick. They way too frequently act like every egg comes from a half zombie chicken that's kept in a little box and tortured just for fun, or that a cow couldn't possibly end up in a cheeseburger after living its best life. Factory farming is bad for lots of reasons, but it's not characteristic of the entire industry.

[–] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

It's the fandom mostly. I like using Linux but I don't think you are immoral for using windows. Rick and Morty is funny but I don't think Rick is someone to take any advice from. CrossFit seems to work for most people who stick with it but it is one of many options. I won't apologize for being an atheist but I don't think you are stupid for not being one.

The problem with Veganism is the problem with monotheism. There is one proper way to live and all the others are wrong and awful.

That and the lying. I won't deny that there are farmers who abuse their animals, that is a problem that can be dealt with through the legal system, but you can't sell me a sack of lies claiming that I abused the cows I milked growing up. Because I know I didn't.

[–] Objection@lemmy.ml 0 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

But what about disagreements that aren't just about preferences, but about right and wrong? Vegans don't view it as the type of question that's like, "Do you like Kirk or do you like Picard?" but rather as the type of question that's like, "Is it ok to beat your children?" The proper way to live is to not beat children and all other ways are wrong and awful. Framing the question as merely about individual preferences and not about morality is assuming the conclusion.

I won’t deny that there are farmers who abuse their animals, that is a problem that can be dealt with through the legal system, but you can’t sell me a sack of lies claiming that I abused the cows I milked growing up.

The legal system has no interest in addressing the vast majority of animal abuse, and there's a lot of money in it which means enough political influence to ensure that never changes. The vast majority of produced goods relies on abusive conditions. It is possible to produce animal products without abuse, but removing abuse from the system means less will be produced, which means a reduction in consumption is still necessary.

[–] dream_weasel@sh.itjust.works 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

What if I told you the quiet part loud? I don't think every life is fundamentally created equal.

I'm a farm boy turned liberal and if you're going to argue about climate change and the benefits of a vegetarian diet in that respect, you've got the right of it and I'll eat less meat (I'm trying). If you're going to say "cow abuse is child abuse!" I will personally come murder a cow for you and eat it with you (or against you, I guess?).

You are barking up the wrong tree and have missed the point whenever you come to this argument. Plants and animals grown for food ARE. FOR. FOOD. and you will not turn me to your way of thinking by crying foul about their treatment. I would love to minimize animal suffering / I am not into animal torture, but you're just not going to get there unless you're literally demonstrating widespread suffering for sport of livestock animals. If there was a raccoon outside right now screwing with my dog or my kid or my house or whatever I would absolutely end it and not lose a second of sleep, without considering it's children or parentage or treatment.

I am who you are dealing with and who you are trying to convert. The "proper way to live" has nothing to do with it. I grow food, I eliminate pests, I eat the food I intended to raise. Cow, corn, pig, dog, cat, unicorn, etc: it gets to grow and flourish as much as I can provide, then it gets harvested to eat, unless it is invasive then it gets summarily removed.

It's not about callousness or disregard for the beauty of life, my situation has just been fundamentally different than yours unless you also spent childhood raising your own food.

[–] Objection@lemmy.ml -1 points 6 months ago

Do I know you?

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 0 points 6 months ago (2 children)

If you accept that there are moral/ethical problems with eating meat (contribution to climate change, health concerns, animals being killed and eaten, whatever), and choose to eat meat anyway, and encounter a vegan, what has to happen?

You can accept that they are making a better choice, but then you have to accept that you're making a worse choice. Most people are cowards and protect the ego at any cost. Rather than shrugging and saying "yeah, i should eat less meat. Good for you taking the high road", which requires accepting that you're not being the best, you can instead grab onto any reasons why no it's really them that sucks. That's easier, more comfortable, and doesn't require any painful introspection or changes.

It's the same mechanism when people get mad at cyclists, pedestrians, people who go to the gym, people who don't shop at Walmart, whatever. They're doing something that makes you feel bad in comparison. Most people are terrible at that and will lash out instead of doing anything productive.

Alternatively, or maybe additionally, people are really tribal, and once they adopt the idea that vegans (or cyclists, or people driving small cars, or people wearing sandals, whatever) are in the outgroup, then they enjoy being hostile to them.

People are ego driven emotional morons. All of us. Me, too. It's terrible.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

There’s a ton of vegans who exist without trying to force their way of life on everyone, but the ones who do dominate the conversation and can be off putting.

[–] metallic_substance@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Just like with everything else that people make into a lifestyle or part of their identity. Most are cool, but there's always a vocal minority of dillweeds that take it way too seriously or use it to judge others that aren't part of their pack.

[–] Vendetta9076@sh.itjust.works 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Because y'all are fuckin annoying. Good for you on not using animal products. I'm glad you have something you care a lot about. I dont need to hear about it every second of the day though. Vegans IRL generally dont preach about it but online people get on their sop boxes more consistently.

[–] cyrus@sopuli.xyz 1 points 6 months ago

I think what you're experiencing online is a mix of loud minorities^1^ and online disinhibition^2^, not an accurate representation of vegans.

1: When there exists a minority in XYZ Group that is "louder" than the majority, causing people to associate XYZ group with the minority. 2: The phenomena of people acting out more violently, frequently, or pushy online when compared to being in-person, primarily due to anonymity