this post was submitted on 12 Jun 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

58507 readers
5244 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Mozilla, the maker of the popular web browser Firefox, said it received government demands to block add-ons that circumvent censorship.

The Mozilla Foundation, the entity behind the web browser Firefox, is blocking various censorship circumvention add-ons for its browser, including ones specifically to help those in Russia bypass state censorship. The add-ons were blocked at the request of Russia’s federal censorship agency, Roskomnadzor — the Federal Service for Supervision of Communications, Information Technology, and Mass Media — according to a statement by Mozilla to The Intercept.

“Following recent regulatory changes in Russia, we received persistent requests from Roskomnadzor demanding that five add-ons be removed from the Mozilla add-on store,” a Mozilla spokesperson told The Intercept in response to a request for comment. “After careful consideration, we’ve temporarily restricted their availability within Russia. Recognizing the implications of these actions, we are closely evaluating our next steps while keeping in mind our local community.”

“It’s a kind of unpleasant surprise because we thought the values of this corporation were very clear in terms of access to information.”

Stanislav Shakirov, the chief technical officer of Roskomsvoboda, a Russian open internet group, said he hoped it was a rash decision by Mozilla that will be more carefully examined.

“It’s a kind of unpleasant surprise because we thought the values of this corporation were very clear in terms of access to information, and its policy was somewhat different,” Shakirov said. “And due to these values, it should not be so simple to comply with state censors and fulfill the requirements of laws that have little to do with common sense.”

Developers of digital tools designed to get around censorship began noticing recently that their Firefox add-ons were no longer available in Russia.

On June 8, the developer of Censor Tracker, an add-on for bypassing internet censorship restrictions in Russia and other former Soviet countries, made a post on the Mozilla Foundation’s discussion forums saying that their extension was unavailable to users in Russia.

The developer of another add-on, Runet Censorship Bypass, which is specifically designed to bypass Roskomnadzor censorship, posted in the thread that their extension was also blocked. The developer said they did not receive any notification from Mozilla regarding the block.

Two VPN add-ons, Planet VPN and FastProxy — the latter explicitly designed for Russian users to bypass Russian censorship — are also blocked. VPNs, or virtual private networks, are designed to obscure internet users’ locations by routing users’ traffic through servers in other countries.

The Intercept verified that all four add-ons are blocked in Russia. If the webpage for the add-on is accessed from a Russian IP address, the Mozilla add-on page displays a message: “The page you tried to access is not available in your region.” If the add-on is accessed with an IP address outside of Russia, the add-on page loads successfully.

Supervision of Communications

Roskomnadzor is responsible for “control and supervision in telecommunications, information technology, and mass communications,” according to the Russia’s federal censorship agency’s English-language page.

In March, the New York Times reported that Roskomnadzor was increasing its operations to restrict access to censorship circumvention technologies such as VPNs. In 2018, there were multiple user reports that Roskomnadzor had blocked access to the entire Firefox Add-on Store.

According to Mozilla’s Pledge for a Healthy Internet, the Mozilla Foundation is “committed to an internet that includes all the peoples of the earth — where a person’s demographic characteristics do not determine their online access, opportunities, or quality of experience.” Mozilla’s second principle in their manifesto says, “The internet is a global public resource that must remain open and accessible.”

The Mozilla Foundation, which in tandem with its for-profit arm Mozilla Corporation releases Firefox, also operates its own VPN service, Mozilla VPN. However, it is only available in 33 countries, a list that doesn’t include Russia.

The same four censorship circumvention add-ons also appear to be available for other web browsers without being blocked by the browsers’ web stores. Censor Tracker, for instance, remains available for the Google Chrome web browser, and the Chrome Web Store page for the add-on works from Russian IP addresses. The same holds for Runet Censorship Bypass, VPN Planet, and FastProxy.

“In general, it’s hard to recall anyone else who has done something similar lately,” said Shakirov, the Russian open internet advocate. “For the last few months, Roskomnadzor (after the adoption of the law in Russia that prohibits the promotion of tools for bypassing blockings) has been sending such complaints about content to everyone.”

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 1 points 3 months ago (6 children)

“Following recent regulatory changes in Russia, we received persistent requests from Roskomnadzor demanding that five add-ons be removed from the Mozilla add-on store,” a Mozilla spokesperson told The Intercept in response to a request for comment. “After careful consideration, we’ve temporarily restricted their availability within Russia. Recognizing the implications of these actions, we are closely evaluating our next steps while keeping in mind our local community.”

People are getting upset about this, but it only applies within the country where Roskomnadzor has authority, and it's temporary pending further review.

Slow down your condemnations. Mozilla, as a law-abiding organization, must at least acknowledge the requests of a regulatory agency within its own country. Whether you agree with their requests or not, Roskomnadzor has governmental authority in this context within Russia.

Stop jumping to conclusions, actually read the article, and put the fucking pitchforks away.

[–] MrSqueezles@lemm.ee 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Remember when China told Google to censor web search results and Google said, "No. How about we show those search results with notes that they were censored and why since the sites will be blocked anyway?", and China was like, "You can't show them at all.", and Google said, "Fuck you. We'd rather lose access to the Chinese market than violate our principles.", and instantly shut down any service in China that would require censorship or disclosing private data and closed all Chinese offices working on any of those technologies?

What a time we're living in.

[–] GreatDong3000@lemm.ee 1 points 3 months ago

It is a good stand from google but...

In the end it was all censored, since google wasn't even there anymore, and China was left with a huge market opportunity for their own internal companies to serve their internal market instead of a foreign company. The Chinese people ended up worse off, Google ended up worse off, Chinese censorship won, Chinese tech companies won.

So still sucks either way. With firefox not being banned Russians can still load up the extensions, just have to get them from other sources.

[–] verity_kindle@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 months ago

Thanks for the reminder.

[–] willow@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 3 months ago

LOL. It's quite easy to sideload Firefox add-ons and I'm pretty sure these add-ons are already available elsewhere, through IPFS, Tor, or even a Telegram bot.

[–] veniasilente@lemm.ee 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

People are getting upset about this, but it only applies within the country where Roskomnadzor has authority, and it’s temporary pending further review.

Which means that now, for example, Republicans can file to have any extension that "provides or facilitates woke content". To put forth one (1) such case.

Idiot laws are idiot and must be fought at every point, in particular if you have more power than one (1) mere citizen. What Mozilla is doing is just announcing to the world they're open to spreading their legs before the MAGAs.

Mozilla, as a law-abiding organization, must at least acknowledge the requests of a regulatory agency within its own country.

Insert Nick Fury "I recognize the council has made an ass-stupid decision".

Whether you agree with their requests or not, Roskomnadzor has governmental authority in this context within Russia.

[–] Weslee@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Also the fact they didn't tell anyone until people started asking questions... This isn't a "good faith, temporary" action. It's a "let's hope no one notices us doing bad shit" action.

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 1 points 3 months ago

🙋‍♂️ I have a question.

My pitchfork is meant for Roskomnadzor, not Mozilla. Do I still have to put it away?

[–] Hawke@lemmy.world -1 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Mozilla, as a law-abiding organization, must at least acknowledge the requests of a regulatory agency within its own country.

TIL that Mozilla is a Russian company.

But seriously why the hell would Mozilla be obliged to acknowledge this request? Do they have offices in Russia?

[–] Isoprenoid@programming.dev 0 points 3 months ago (5 children)

Do they have offices in Russia?

Are you implying that if my office isn't in a certain country, that means my software doesn't have to obey that country's regulatory agencies?

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

But seriously why the hell would Mozilla be obliged to acknowledge this request? Do they have offices in Russia?

Roskomnadzor has regulatory authority in Russia. Roskomnadzor has the legal authority to regulate communications technology within Russia. They are completely within their rights to enforce this within Russia, regardless of what people living in other countries think about it, and organizations operating within Russia are legally bound to abide by the Russian government's regulations within Russia, just as they are in every other country.

[–] Hawke@lemmy.world -1 points 3 months ago

Sure, and they can regulate it by blocking access to Mozilla. That’d be within their authority.

That doesn’t mean Mozilla has to answer to them. Mozilla would be within their rights to ignore Roskomnador.

Whether they should is another matter but they don’t have to respond.

[–] Cincinnatus@lemmy.today 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Mozilla is making a mistake in my opinion, should've never started obeying terrorist Russia. I have a feeling that's going to hurt them more than just getting their browser blocked in Russia. They should've stood up for their values instead of caving...just sayin

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.zip 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

This is not equating one to another, but the US invasion of Iraq is how much less terrorist? And how much less terrorist is what some US allies do, like Turkey and Israel? And how much less terrorist is surveillance in western countries?

(Please don't comment with "whataboutism", there's a reason this word is used only in politics, cause everywhere else it's assumed rules should apply equally.)

Also escaping Russian censorship is becoming less valuable the way the global Web has become, TBH. Why escape a propaganda and stupidity ridden space for a vaster propaganda and stupidity ridden space?

That said, it sucks, I've just gotten used to such addons as in the title a few months ago instead of having a separate profile with Tor.

[–] uis@lemm.ee 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Where the fuck Iraq came from?

Why escape a propaganda and stupidity ridden space for a vaster propaganda and stupidity ridden space?

Same thought Yandex progrrammers. Now Yandex is biggest source of propaganda on the Internet.

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.zip 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Where the fuck Iraq came from?

From unprovoked invasions.

Same thought Yandex progrrammers. Now Yandex is biggest source of propaganda on the Internet.

Yandex just aggregates Russian media, which obviously conform. I don't know what this was about, though, it's incomprehensible.

[–] uis@lemm.ee 1 points 3 months ago

Yandex just aggregates Russian media

Google just aggregates American media. Do you see mistake here? Even when talking about only Yandex News, first they blocked "unwanted organizations" that did have media license(like Novaya Gazeta), then they increased weight of TASS, and it ended in entire news is "Putin caught pencil".

And this ignores main Yandex' product - Yandex(the search engine). It bans all pages that contain both Pu and words "краб"(crab), "пиздабол"(liar), "плешивий"(bald), "бункерный дед"(bunker old man), "главный вор"(head thief) and "хуйло"(huilo, I don't need to explain, georgians and ukrainians can do it better than me).

[–] cheddar@programming.dev 1 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I see a lot of gentle replies. I wonder if they would have looked the same if the browser in question was Google Chrome. The issue is that you can't win this game. They ask you one thing, then another, then another, until you either fully comply or stop cooperating, and they block you anyway. That's a reputational hit for the company and its product, whose only competitive advantage was its reputation.

[–] Konstant@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

I mean, I'm not ditching Firefox over this.

[–] nadram@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Well said and a good reminder to keep our loyalties / fanboyisms in check

[–] fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 months ago

Mozilla fanboy here, this feels like an absolute diversion from the mission. They should have at least notified the community and devs some how, delayed the best they could, and then ban them to prevent being censored too. They better fight it or at empower someone that can (both technical circumvention attempts and legal rectification).

[–] Vitaly@feddit.uk 1 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Since russia is a terrorist state I dont really understand why even communicate with them in the first place

[–] maxenmajs@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

This is an unpleasant dilemma. What is the other option? Stick to their principles and let Russia ban Firefox? It's not ideal but people in Russia can still install add-ons from file.

[–] nadram@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

With the same logic, nothing is stopping people to download firefox from alternative sources 🤷‍♂️ There would be losses in market share (in Russia) had they refused to play along, but now Mozilla spread it's buttcheeks for governments to impose themselves. Once again, it's mostly about the money.

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It's not that we want to communicate with the state of Russia, it is so citizens of Russia can see real and true information from the inside and out.

[–] suction@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Doesn’t seem to help though

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Couldn't hurt. It's about the principle of freedom.

[–] suction@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (2 children)

History doesn’t really suggest that Russian people think much of that principle. They seem to enjoy living under strong men authoritarian rule.

[–] uis@lemm.ee 1 points 3 months ago

History doesn’t really suggest that Russian people think much of that principle.

1917

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It's not about what they enjoy, it's about what they deserve. People deserve the truth, whether they like it or not. That's what I believe.

[–] suction@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

You would be right at home in Russia then

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

🤨 I think we're not getting through to each other...

[–] suction@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I mean you sound like you watched too many Superhero movies lately with your pathetic screed about what "you believe" LMAO

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Believing in the basic human right to freedom and truth is pathetic now?

Let me guess, "believing in something" is "gay" too, am I right?

Quit now before you embarrass yourself further. This is too much cringe.

[–] suction@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

How old are you? Around the Marvel fan age 12-35?

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I'm 37. I've always hated superhero movies. More into horror and space/sci-fi.

Are we done here with you trying to berate me? You're not showing your best colors here, you know. These ad hominems are giving me second-hand embarrassment.

[–] suction@lemmy.world -1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Sorry man, it’s just funny to me when someone tries to sound like a character in a trope-y Hollywood movie. Never mind, move along.

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Well, I'm not trying to sound like anything. I'm just telling you a fact, that I believe in such and such. I think you've been watching too many movies if you think that someone merely telling you they "believe in something" is a goddamn movie trope... Like, come on.

Maybe when reading the text you're projecting your own version of what I'm saying with a bunch of intonation and body language and stuff that only exists in your head. But rest assured, I'm not acting all emotional and holding out my fist in the air when I say that I "believe in freedom and a right to truthful information". I'm merely telling you, with a deadpan look.

All good? 👌

[–] suction@lemmy.world -1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Maybe it's me, maybe it's you, it's all just child's urine off an old man's face.

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Jesus, man.

It's definitely you.

[–] cm0002@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Wow, wtf Firefox? Not even Chrome is blocking some of the add-ons...

Guess enshittification is starting to creep into Firefox now too

[–] kakes@sh.itjust.works 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

God I'm getting sick of that word.

[–] DarkGamer@fedia.io 1 points 3 months ago

I'm sick of the concept it represents.

[–] 0Xero0@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Dammit, Firefox! You was the chosen one! It was said that you would destroy the anti-privacy, not join them! You were to bring security to the internet, not leave it in neo-naZi's propaganda.

[–] FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today -1 points 3 months ago

They were never really the chosen ones, just the most well known GECKO browser.

[–] FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today -1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Yeh they enshitified starting quite some time ago, and with only sub-3% market share lmao.

If you like GECKO based browsers like firefox then try out Waterfox or others.

load more comments
view more: next ›