this post was submitted on 21 Jun 2024
5 points (100.0% liked)

RetroGaming

19045 readers
250 users here now

Vintage gaming community.

Rules:

  1. Be kind.
  2. No spam or soliciting for money.
  3. No racism or other bigotry allowed.
  4. Obviously nothing illegal.

If you see these please report them.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Pocket 386 supports external accessories and will just barely run Windows 95.

all 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

This is cool but not for $200. That's way overpriced for something this underpowered.

[–] themoonisacheese@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Right? Surely you could translate it to run on a $1 esp32?

[–] Eldritch@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

This is actual hardware. Yes simple arm cores can pretty faithfully emulate much of this. But that's emulation. These are bespoke devices, built from actual old chips. Offering a level of comparability and predictability emulation can't always achieve. It isn't for everyone.

Adrian Black ended up with a non functioning unit sent to him by a viewer that bought one. The seller rather than pay for postage for the broken one to be sent back to China just told them to keep it and sent them a replacement instead. Adrian ends up troubleshooting and fixing it but you can get a pretty good look at everything going on inside and some of the old chips involved.

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Running anything on a 386 was NOT fun. I don't think I'd pay $200 for the privilege of hating it all over again.

[–] aseriesoftubes@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

At the same time, it forced me to learn. Nowadays, every game and app you’d want is a few clicks away, and most likely it’ll just work without having to think about IRQ settings or COM ports or whether there’s enough space on your 50 MB hard disk.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, but they should have gone with a 486DX, or SX at least. HUGE difference. The 386 was just too damned frustrating, but it was the first work PC I ever laid hands on. For a personal computer, I upgraded from a 286 to a Pentium 200.

[–] Hawke@lemmy.world -1 points 2 months ago

Yeah, 486 DX4/100 was the peak of DOS gaming.

[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The first two ads I see under the article are for hearing aids, which probably describes the target market for this thing.

[–] DannyMac@lemm.ee 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Found Stone Cold Steve Austin.

[–] Gullible@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Out of curiosity, what’s the utility in this? Is it meant to be a toy of sorts?

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I've got a 486SX industrial PC that I refurbed. Much fun!

But you can hardly expand this thing at all. And there's a hella dividing line between a 386 and any given 486. I got mine loaded with 128MB, USB floppy emulator (a MUST have) and an SSD (through adapters). You just can't do that with this animal, can't even add a math coprocessor.

I'd give $20 to have one to play with, that's it.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world -2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

What is their intended market? I see no real use for such a box. Heck, even Linux will probably come to a crawl on that box. And you can probably build something ARM based for the same price with eight gigabytes of RAM and running circles around the 386.

[–] bloup@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 2 months ago

Retrocomputing hobbyists and collectors.