this post was submitted on 23 Jun 2024
28 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19170 readers
5938 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago

Sorry CO-4, she's your problem now.

-Resident of CO-3

[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago

I note that her opponent is doing commercials sitting in the same notorious theatre seats. Pretty slick.

She will lose badly in November

[–] Sho@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

My bet is she loses and ends up on either YouTube, twitch, or onlyfans. Heck she may even double up.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

{ insert donnie's "dance" where he looks like he's jerking off two dudes }

[–] Sho@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

TWO DICK DANCE!

[–] Saljid@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Kick her out already. Although being a standout in this party full of ignorant Imbeciles is quite the feat

[–] nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Cawthorn managed it and got the boot. But there are still so many more that deserve the same treatment.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

I'm assuming that was just payback for talking too much about other cons.

[–] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

Well then, guess she'd better start handing out reasons for the voters to choose her.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

Phrasing! That headline sounds like something Tobias would say, for example:

"I’m afraid I prematurely shot my wad on what was supposed to be a dry run, if you will, so I’m afraid I have something of a mess on my hands."

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 1 points 4 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


She remains hounded by the scandals which have dominated headlines for months: a messy separation with a husband that led to an embarrassingly public incident, as well as her unglamorous removal from a theater performance of Beetlejuice after she and her date were caught vaping and engaging in lewd acts.

Though one poll of the sparsely-surveyed district from Kaplan Strategies in early June showed her as the frontrunner, an equal share of voters were undecided — meaning the race could be anyone’s game.

Reporting of the race has generally indicated that two of Boebert’s six challengers, Jerry Sonnenberg and Richard Holtorf, are her best-positioned opponents in terms of statewide political support, fundraising and grassroots interest.

He said that he planned to be on the ground meeting voters — shepherded around the state in one of his several big-rig trucks, hauling a cattle carrier emblazoned with Trump signs — until the day of the primary.

Holtorf contended that Boebert would go the same way as another scandal-plagued, camera-obsessed former member of the House: Madison Cawthorn, who flamed out in 2022 after angering GOP colleagues in Washington DC and ending up the subject of a leaked nude video.

Experts within the state have echoed the speculation that the inability of Boebert’s challengers to narrow down the field could end up being what sends the congresswoman back to the House.


The original article contains 1,017 words, the summary contains 227 words. Saved 78%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!