this post was submitted on 03 Jul 2024
51 points (100.0% liked)

UK Politics

3089 readers
58 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both !uk_politics@feddit.uk and !unitedkingdom@feddit.uk .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

!ukpolitics@lemm.ee appears to have vanished! We can still see cached content from this link, but goodbye I guess! :'(

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The Sun newspaper has backed Labour at the General Election providing a huge blow to Rishi Sunak’s chances.

The tabloid has said “It’s time for a new manager” hours before Britain is set to go to the polls.

The paper also famously backed Tony Blair’s Labour Party when he won a landslide victory in 1997, switching sides after more than 20 years of unswerving support for the Tory party. It has previously backed Tory candidates for the past 15 years helping David Cameron and Theresa May enter Downing Street.

The Rupert Murdoch-owned paper wrote: It’s time for change. The insurmountable problem faced by the (Conservatives) is that - over the course of 14 often chaotic years - they have become a divided rabble, more interested in fighting themselves than running the country.

“By the time Rishi Sunak moved into No10, Britain had had five Prime Ministers in just 12 years. In 2022 alone, there were four Home Secretaries, four Chancellors, and five Education Secretaries.

“All this upheaval, backstabbing and mayhem came at a price.”

It added: "There are still plenty of concerns about Labour ... But, by dragging his party back to the centre ground of British politics for the first time since Tony Blair was in No. 10, Sir Keir has won the right to take charge."

top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] GreatAlbatross@feddit.uk 33 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I was wondering "when are the conservative supporting media going to start flipping so they're on the winning team?".

Looks like "the day before" is the answer!

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Seems like a daft idea to change sides right at the 11th hour. Their readers tend to have a certain amount of momentum to their thinking, you need to slowly work up to a tonal shift.

[–] GeneralInterest@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago

I don't think The Sun is trying to convince people to vote Labour, I think they just don't want to be on the losing side, so that's why they're not backing Rishi.

They even say in their piece that they support many of Rishi's policies. Then they reluctantly say "it is time for Labour", which sounds to me like a bitter acceptance that Labour will likely win, rather than them encouraging people to vote for Labour.

[–] MrNesser@lemmy.world 28 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Murdoch has given the blessing it is written let it be done.

The Sun has decided to shove its proverbial nose up the arse of the clear winner yet again.

[–] Salvo@aussie.zone 8 points 4 months ago (1 children)

This is purely so Rupe can turn around to Labour and say “I made you, so do as I say!”.

[–] MrNesser@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)

He's missed the boat on this one haha

[–] 9point6@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I bet you any money they still run the fart-sniffing "it's the sun wot won it" headline tomorrow

[–] MrNesser@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

Sure as the star had tits on page 3

[–] Emperor@feddit.uk 21 points 4 months ago (4 children)

So late in the day and given the impressive poll lead, it just feels opportunistic. I bet they'll try and claim "it was The Sun wot won it!"

The interesting thing is that Starmer hasn't been courting Murdoch, as Blair did. His plan seems to have been keep your head down and don't give the right wing press an attack surface.

[–] Womble@lemmy.world 12 points 4 months ago

Starmer tried to court Murdoch hard, but apparently Murdoch holds a grudge that it was Starmer as DPP who prosecuted the phone hacking crimes and got Andy Coulson convicted and has refused to have anything to do with him.

[–] NickwithaC@lemmy.world 8 points 4 months ago

The Sun and opportunism go hand in hand.

[–] plinky@hexbear.net 4 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)
[–] Emperor@feddit.uk 6 points 4 months ago

I may have to take that back.

[–] DrCake@lemmy.world 11 points 4 months ago

So this means the sun won’t immediately blame everything on labour after the election, right? Right?

[–] fubarx@lemmy.ml 9 points 4 months ago

Solid, principled journalism. /s