this post was submitted on 24 Jun 2024
146 points (94.5% liked)

World News

31453 readers
1629 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
all 49 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] nekandro@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 week ago (8 children)

This strike is extremely confusing. It's a space radar thats only other use case is as an early-warning radar for ICBMs (that is, in the event of nuclear war).

Why is Ukraine going after Russia's nuclear triad? What the fuck is going on?

[–] ThePyroPython@lemmy.world 36 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I would guess this is likely to get Russia to dedicate more forces to protecting their nuclear capabilities because without that Putin knows he's fucked.

The more anti-missile and anti-air are dedicated to protecting nuclear triad infrastructure, the less is protecting other assets like HQs, supply depos, aircraft and other conventional combat systems.

[–] filoria@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

dedicate more forces to protecting their nuclear capabilities

Are you hearing yourself? The nuclear capability is the protection. There's a reason that during the Cold War nobody was stupid enough to attack someone else's nuclear early warning radar. The entire principle of mutually assured destruction relies on both parties knowing what the other is NOT doing so they know that they don't need to respond.

[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

A preemptive strike is still suicide even if it's done because early detection capabilities are reduced or lost. And a first strike against someone without early detection capabilities still isn't a guaranteed win when the subs are still hidden and the doomsday device is still armed.

[–] Taco2112@lemmy.world 22 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Where are you reading that is a radar for ICBMs? The article just says a Krasukha radar jammer is reported to be there. Reading the Wikipedia article for these systems indicate that they can jam the radar for UAVs and drones. Since Ukraine has been using drones heavily, I can see why they would attack. I’m not saying that it doesn’t work against ballistic missiles but it’s seems like they have a lot of other applications to Russia’s war effort.

[–] Liz@midwest.social 18 points 1 week ago

Open source researchers on social media suggested a Krasukha electronic warfare radar jammer had been positioned on the complex.

That's why. The jammer is messing with Ukrainian operations and Russia put it there so they could scream "nuclear site!" if Ukraine ever went after it.

[–] Chainweasel@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Well it's Russian infrastructure on Ukrainian land, who cares what it's for?

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

So a simple eviction -slash- fireworks show then.

Wheeeee!

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Also, according to the genius logic there Ukraine is using cluster munitions to bomb their own civilians since these clowns claim that Crimea is Ukrainian.

[–] Olifant@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Which by all rights it is... annexation not withstanding.

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 week ago

Given that Ukraine has no qualms murdering them, it's no surprise that people actually living in Crimea overwhelmingly voted to join Russia. Funny how westerners only care about self determination when it suits them.

[–] LarkinDePark@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 1 week ago

It's literally Russian land. The people voted to leave the fascist puppet state.

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 week ago

literally everyone who is not an imbecile

[–] Nakoichi@hexbear.net 10 points 1 week ago

Well that's not at all concerning...

I used to think nobody was stupid enough to kick off an apocalyptic nuclear war but in the last two years I feel like that belief may have been a bit naive.

[–] Collatz_problem@hexbear.net 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I guess they are trying to achieve the possibility of a decisive first strike for USA.

[–] MrVilliam@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Because any country fighting a war on defense against aggressors/invaders knows that the path to winning is to hold strong, wait out the clock, and drain resources from the enemy. Something as essential as that will cause urgency to redirect resources and personnel to replace/repair and then better defend it so that it doesn't just immediately happen again. This makes defense easier because there's less of an offense while that's happening. This also can cause internal loss of support since Russian citizens can see the costs of this going up. They will know people who were sent to die on the front lines. They will see taxes go up and availability of goods go down. Once Russian citizens start to question and criticize the campaign, there could be a snowball effect that ends with Putin and his cronies having to make a choice between stopping the invasion or losing power. I don't think Putin will ever stop, so the real choice will be desperate attacks (which could include nukes, triggering article 5 and effectively ending Russia) or a coup. Putin has checkmated himself whether he is aware of it yet or not. His best case scenario at this point is dying of natural causes in office and leaving that hard decision to his successor who will probably back down and be a pariah for it, saving Russia in the process.

[–] LarkinDePark@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 1 week ago

Didn't work. Only the western aggressor is drained, militarily and morally. The war is lost, Russia won.