this post was submitted on 24 Jun 2024
69 points (94.8% liked)

Asklemmy

43792 readers
928 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy πŸ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

By greatest invention I mean something that had big and positive influence.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] thepreciousboar@lemm.ee 67 points 4 months ago (4 children)

We are in a time where a single invention can rarelt be great. For technological development you need thousands of small inventions, each that use previous technological breakthrough through decades of research. And even great things we have, are just refinement and miniaturization of things we already had.

But if a single thing had to be said, I would say mRNA vaccines. Covid vaccines saved milions of lives, were developed in record times, and their technology could be used for HIV or even antitumoral vaccines.

[–] frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.ml 11 points 4 months ago

Came here to say it.

The heroic inventor story is archaic.

[–] sasquash@sopuli.xyz 7 points 4 months ago (2 children)

but the research began already back in the 60s.

[–] thepreciousboar@lemm.ee 11 points 4 months ago

That's why I'm saying that a single invention that changed the world is not something you can easily find anymore.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] tmpod 6 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Was going to say that too. Regardless of the motives and driving forces behind the incredible speed at which the vaccines were developed (i.e. certainly a similar urgency could be applied to other diseases killing thousands and millions in poorer countries, but there ain't as much interest in that), the mRNA technology proved quite powerful and an avenue to continue exploring in future research.

[–] fartsparkles@sh.itjust.works 6 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

People forget that the research behind those vaccines had been going on for 30+ years. What was accelerated was the trials and the gathering and analysis of efficacy and safety data. The actual vaccine technology had been in existence for around a decade at the time.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] efstajas@lemmy.world 37 points 4 months ago (2 children)

I gotta say mRNA vaccines. It's not technically a 21st century invention, but much of the work to make them viable started in the early 2000s. The speed at which the COVID vaccine got developed and widely deployed was honestly incredible and a massive W for humanity. I remember thinking a vaccine would be years away.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Yerbouti@lemmy.ml 24 points 4 months ago (11 children)
[–] BonesOfTheMoon@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago

Warmed my heart.

[–] arefx@lemmy.ml 5 points 4 months ago
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] emergencyfood@sh.itjust.works 24 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Wikipedia (Jan 2001, so barely squeaked in)

[–] todd_bonzalez@lemm.ee 3 points 4 months ago

Hell yeah on correctly recognizing what year was the first year of the 21st century! Thinking the new millennium started in 2000 is a pet peeve of mine.

[–] 5714@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 4 months ago (3 children)

CRISPR

Corona vaccines

Online Streaming

Online Maps

Wikipedia

Drone Warfare

LHC

Paris climate treaty

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Wahots@pawb.social 19 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Hard to quantify, but stuff like PrEP (a drug used to prevent HIV infection) has probably saved a staggering number of lives across the globe, same with the yearly influenza vaccines.

For a more personal one?

I'd say the innovations to bikes, which have been staggering since 2000. Downhill mountain bikes have had staggering changes that make them lighter, faster, stronger, and way more stable, and they look dramatically different to their 90s counterparts. Stuff like dropper posts, modern full suspension, tubeless tires, disc brakes, and massive cassettes make them incredible. You can roll over a cantaloupe-sized rock at 20mph and the bike will just take it without you being ejected over the bars.

Ebikes have totally changed the calculus in hilly cities, even in flat ones to some extent. Being able to effortlessly bike 45 miles and not be totally thrashed the next day is such a gamechanger, it's actually beyond belief. My car has been largely collecting dust because most trips day to day are under 45 miles. And it takes pennies to recharge vs $90 or so to refill the tank.

Bikes already help take tons of cars off the road worldwide, but ebikes could really help extend people's ranges, particularly if they would normally drive otherwise.

[–] JudahBenHur@lemm.ee 3 points 4 months ago (2 children)

getting from my house to my office on my old road bike used to take 45 mins and I'd be sweaty when I got there, and the idea of 45 mins uphill after work used to make me wanna off myself. Since I got an e-assist its 25 mins and I'm like lah de dah meep meep

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] DrBob@lemmy.ca 13 points 4 months ago (4 children)

I'm genuinely not sure that anything has been invented in the 21st century.

[–] kotauskas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Many things that were conceptually conceived in the 20th century didn't become viable until the 21st, such as OLED, VR and AR, raytracing, telesurgery, a whole slew of types of artificial organs, a gigantic amount of miscellaneous advancements in integrated circuit fabrication, alternative vehicle fuel such as methane, hydrogen and rechargeable batteries; maglev trains, innumerable safety improvements in aviation, mRNA vaccines and so on and so forth. I don't think it's fair to credit all that stuff to the 20th century, unless someone somewhere saying "be real cool if we could do that" counts as inventing something.

[–] DrBob@lemmy.ca 9 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (4 children)

OLEDs were built in 1987 I saw my first VR demonstration in the 90s (and it wasn't cutting edge then). I saw my first AR demonstration then as well as part of an undergraduate engineering fair. And so on. I just looked up maglev trains - in commercial use since 1984.

I don't disagree that there hasn't been refinements, improvements, or commercialization of technology, but there hasn't been a technological leap or invention that I can think of in the 21st century.

[–] Hexorg@beehaw.org 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)

To be fair, there’s only been 24 year’s of 21 century. Most things you gave listed happened at the end of the 20th century. But also the question is somewhat self negating - we won’t know what’s the greatest invention until we see it working great, but it takes much more than 24 years to take an invention from concept to consumption. For example computational biology is kicking off. Computer aided dna generation started in the past 24 years. But it’s so new few people think about it. Just like no one thought of internet as the greatest invention in the 70s… it was just too new

[–] DrBob@lemmy.ca 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

You're not wrong. But there are counter examples. I was going to use the example of the jet engine in my last answer as a true paradigm shifting development that had immediate impact. And in the mid-century period too! Or the first powered flight occurred in the first decade of the 20th century and had an immediate impact. The transistor and solid state electronics would be another example.

So let me flip it around and say we've had a quarter century without a major technological breakthrough. There's been progress, but it feels incremental. I spent a night with a physicist a few years ago who was arguing that progress is slowing because we are still relying on the exploitation of Newtonian physics. There are a few technologies that have made the leap to nuclear physics. But we've had the basics of quantum physics for a century now and haven't been able to exploit it in a useful fashion.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] ace_garp@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

Only birds.

[–] starman@programming.dev 3 points 4 months ago

Yeah, I was thinking about it and then asked here. It seems like most of nice stuff was invented in the 19st century, and in the past 24 years we just improve it.

[–] atimehoodie@lemmy.ml 12 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Guys you're all wrong.

It's PornHub.

[–] Socsa@sh.itjust.works 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)
[–] ExperimentalGuy@programming.dev 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)
[–] Socsa@sh.itjust.works 7 points 4 months ago (1 children)
[–] LordGimp@lemm.ee 6 points 4 months ago
[–] shinigamiookamiryuu@lemm.ee 12 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Those little straws with the filters inside that allow people to drink contaminated water right from the source.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 9 points 4 months ago (1 children)

One of those saved my ass on a solo, overnight kayaking trip. I mostly brought beer, ice and food in my tow-behind cooler because I had a Life Straw.

The trip was hell, most difficult thing I've ever done, wasn't sure I'd make it out. Was good on water until the next day when I finally broke out onto the main creek.

Cut the top off a can and sucked down 7 refills of creek water. Tasted exactly like warm, flat, tap water.

[–] rbos@lemmy.ca 5 points 4 months ago

Look into Sawyer water filters. Much easier to use than lifestraws, last longer. Pressure instead of suction.

[–] souperk@reddthat.com 11 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The 21st century has been mostly focused on finding new applications of existing technology. A lot of things are changing in pretty much every aspect of life, but nothing is entirely new.

The internet has really changed the shape of our world, but, even though it really kicked off after the year 2000, it was invented during the 20th century.

Something to keep in mind is that humanity is redifining what counts as an invention, a lot of ideas are created all the time, so the bar has been raised significantly.

Also, we need to keep in mind how big corps have been killing innovation in the name of profit. New products are being created all the time, but they are bought by bigger companies and burried. This is happenig because these innovations carry a certain risk that an established company with a good revenue flow is not willing to accept.

Personally, I am excited about the field of Social Computing, it is still at its infancy and has a lot of potential. The main idea is to create alogirthms based on human interactions that solve real world problems. A few questions one may ask include: How misinformation is being spread, and what is the optimal way to fight it? How do we fight corruption and authoriative power? These questions have been approached by a lot of fields, but creating algorithms and proving their effectiveness requires a deep understanding of computer science.

[–] frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.ml 6 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Personally, I am excited about the field of Social Computing, it is still at its infancy and has a lot of potential. The main idea is to create alogirthms based on human interactions that solve real world problems. A few questions one may ask include: How misinformation is being spread, and what is the optimal way to fight it? How do we fight corruption and authoriative power? These questions have been approached by a lot of fields, but creating algorithms and proving their effectiveness requires a deep understanding of computer science.

I'm not a pessimistic person (I'm neutral), but the sinister implications are obvious.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] BlowMe@lemmy.world 8 points 4 months ago (4 children)

Like it or not. The iPhone. It changed the phone and how we use it. I literally use my android phone for everything now, as a credit card, ticket, pc, social, gaming... some people get laid and marry thanks to them...

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 8 points 4 months ago

Sodium-ion batteries are likely to be the obvious answer in another decade. Dirt cheap, abundant materials, competitive density.

[–] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 6 points 4 months ago (2 children)

I mean we only have had fourth and things happen over time. So I want to say blue led but they existed before the century but just got the process such they can manufacture them. Native white ones are invented now but most white is using the combination method currently with the blue ones. Anyway if it counts I can't imagine how much energy this has saved even over halogens for lighting and then for dispalys to. I would hate to think how much fossile fuel we would be using if we were still on incadescents and crts.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] hanrahan@slrpnk.net 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Can't tbink if anythung really, all we've done is refined some stuff butmaybe mRNA vaccines ?

Mostly we've just enshitified everything and/or made it disposable..From headphones to entire operating systems etc.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] RobotToaster@mander.xyz 4 points 4 months ago

The reprap basically started the entire home 3d printer thing.

[–] VinesNFluff@pawb.social 3 points 4 months ago

The Internet Archive. Technically founded in '96, but didn't come into its own until the mid aughts. It is an awe-inspiring thing that corporate greed has been trying to take from us.

[–] Mechaguana@programming.dev 3 points 4 months ago

I cast: sudo shred *

[–] Philote@lemmy.ml 2 points 4 months ago

Although not very impactful yet, it think aerographene has the potential to be massive.

load more comments
view more: next β€Ί